Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
'Little Thinkers' at New Horizons Portsmouth
Summary
Nicole Atkinson (lead), Natasha Jarvis
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Little Thinkers Pre-School & Nursery
- Group reference verified
RP525109
- Inspection date verified
11 Mar 2025
- Inspectors AI-checked
Natasha Jarvis, Nicole Atkinson
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
PO2 7HX
- Name on report verified
'Little Thinkers' at New Horizons Portsmouth
- URN verified
EY295936
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2020.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This means that there are times when ratios are not met, and staff deployment is not consistently effective. p.2
- The lack of oversight by the provider and leaders has led to weaknesses in the safety of the provision. p.2
- improve oversight and governance of the provision, especially in regard to risk assessments, to ensure leaders identify and address potential hazards to minimise the risk of harm to children 25/03/2025 p.4
- Weaknesses in leadership and management affect children's safety and well-being. p.2
- Although risk assessments are completed, they are not effective. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
SEND & inclusion7
“The provision for children with SEND is not effective.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,208
- about usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of 'Little Thinkers' at New Horizons Portsmouth Isambard Brunel Junior School, Wymering Road, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO2 7HX
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Weaknesses in leadership and management affect children's safety and well-being. Leaders do not have effective oversight of the nursery. For example, they do not do enough to ensure that the environment remains safe at all times. Although risk assessments are completed, they are not effective. For instance, when there are issues, such as children being unsupervised in areas that are not safe and out of staff's sight and/or hearing, swift action is not taken. Furthermore, leaders are not always clear on how many children are in each area. This means that there are times when ratios are not met, and staff deployment is not consistently effective. This does not safeguard children.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Staff plan activities that have clear links to the curriculum intentions, such as supporting children's physical development, developing their social skills and encouraging them to be confident communicators. Children show excitement and positive attitudes to learning, such as when choosing songs and rhymes to sing. However, children who speak English as an additional language and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), do not always benefit from meaningful and effectively planned activities that support them in their development, which impacts their behaviour and attitudes to learning. There are significant inconsistencies in the quality of education that children receive. While most children benefit from a generally effective curriculum that supports their learning, the quality of education for children with SEND is not good enough.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Overall, children arrive happy and enjoy their time at nursery. They benefit from the warm and welcoming environment that the staff team provide. Generally, staff tailor settling-in procedures to meet each child's individual needs. For example, staff follow babies' routines from home to support their transition into nursery. Staff teach children how to share, take turns and play cooperatively together. For instance, children patiently wait their turn to hide as they play hide and seek. This helps children to develop secure attachments, behave well and feel settled at nursery.
p.2
need to do better?
n The lack of oversight by the provider and leaders has led to weaknesses in the safety of the provision. Although leaders complete daily risk assessments they are not effective, as they do not identify all risks in the environment. For example, children are able to have unsupervised access to a kitchen area. Although this had been brought to the attention of leaders, they did nothing to secure the area. Furthermore, in a toilet used by children, there are cleaning products left within their reach. This demonstrates significant weaknesses in assessing and managing risks and compromises children's safety.
p.2
need to do better?
11 March 2025 n Leaders do not ensure that ratios are consistently met. For instance, on arrival there were not sufficient staff to meet ratio requirements for babies or older children. Furthermore, leaders do not ensure children are adequately supervised at all times to keep them safe. For example, children access the bathroom unsupervised through a heavy door, which some children struggle to open by themselves. In addition, they go through the communal area and down a corridor to the bathroom, which means they are out of sight and/or hearing of staff. This does not ensure children's safety and welfare. n The provision for children with SEND is not effective. Some staff recognise where children have delays in their development. However, leaders do not ensure that timely assessments are completed and do not prioritise making referrals. Individual plans to support children are not followed consistently. For example,
p.2
need to do better?
children with SEND spend a considerable amount of time wandering around aimlessly. They have limited staff interaction and are not supported to engage in the activities on offer. This is mainly due to staff deployment impacting their availability to meet the needs of the children. As a result, children with SEND receive inconsistent support in their development. n Leaders have developed a well-sequenced curriculum that staff have a clear understanding of and implement well. Staff plan purposeful learning opportunities, that support children who do not have SEND. However, the leader's ineffective deployment of staff impacts the quality of interactions, teaching and engagement with children. For instance, at times staff are too busy completing tasks and trying to manage the room, to be able to support the children to engage in purposeful play and learning. This impacts children's behaviour and attitudes towards learning and does not consistently support their
p.3
need to do better?
development. n Staff ensure children have daily opportunities to hear stories and sing songs, to support their developing language skills. For example, children concentrate well, happily join in with words and use puppets, when listening to familiar stories. They engage in conversations with each other and staff. In addition, staff respond to babies' babbles and use single words to name objects for babies to hear and mimic. However, support for children who speak English as an additional language is less effective. For instance, children have limited opportunities to use or hear their home languages in their play and learning. In addition, staff do not always know the relevant information about children who speak English as an additional language. This does not consistently support children's learning and development. n Although there are concerns about the safety of the environment, leaders and staff demonstrate a secure safeguarding knowledge. They know how to make a
p.3
need to do better?
referral about a child, or an adult, and they are aware of the signs and symptoms of abuse. For example, they understand what action they need to take if they have a concern about children's welfare and know how to pass information on to the relevant local safeguarding partners. Leaders and staff have completed safeguarding training and complete regular updates to keep their knowledge current. n Leaders have introduced a new, effective system to provide staff with regular supervisions. They support staff's continued professional development well, such
p.3
need to do better?
11 March 2025 as providing regular team training and training to meet individual needs. Staff comment that they feel supported and have opportunities to discuss their well- being. n Staff are sensitive when following children's care routines. For instance, they talk to babies while changing their nappies and comfort them while settling them off to sleep. This supports babies' well-being. n Staff form professional relationships with parents. Some staff know their key children well and can discuss their interests, progress and next steps. They regularly share information with parents, for example, through electronic systems and at parent meetings. This helps parents to find out about their children's learning and helps them to know how to support their children at home.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.4
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.4
Due date
improve oversight and governance of the provision, especially in regard to risk assessments, to ensure leaders identify and address potential hazards to minimise the risk of harm to children 25/03/2025
p.4
Due date
ensure staff-to-child ratios are met and staff are deployed effectively, so that children remain within sight and/or hearing at all times and within sight and hearing when eating 25/03/2025
p.4
Due date
ensure effective arrangements are in place to support children with SEND, that include making timely assessments and referrals, to ensure their individual needs are met in line with the SEND code of practice. 25/03/2025
p.4
should:
n strengthen support for children who speak English as an additional language to support their development.
p.5
Setting details
Unique reference number EY295936 Local authority Portsmouth Inspection number 10378634 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises Registers Early Years Register Day care type Full day care
p.6
inspection
Total number of places 60 Number of children on roll 145 Name of registered person Little Thinkers Pre-School & Nursery
p.6
reference number
Telephone number 03333602261 Date of previous inspection 22 January 2020
p.6
Information about this early years setting
'Little Thinkers' at New Horizons Portsmouth, previously called Izzies Nursery, registered in 2004. The nursery is located on the same site at New Horizons Primary School, previously Isambard Brunel Junior School, Portsmouth. The nursery is open from 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, all year round. It employs 24 members of staff, 14 of whom have level 3 or above early years qualifications. The nursery receives early years funding for children aged two, three and four years old.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors Nicole Atkinson Natasha Jarvis
p.6
Inspection activities
n The inspectors viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n The deputy manager, manager and inspectors completed a learning walk together of all areas of the nursery and discussed the early years curriculum. n Children spoke with the inspectors during the inspection. n The inspectors talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspectors spoke with the nominated individual, manager and deputy manager about the leadership and management of the nursery. n Staff spoke to the inspectors about how they support children with SEND. n The inspectors observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspector and the manager carried out a joint observation of an activity. n Parents shared their views of the setting with the inspector.
p.7
Inspection activities
n The inspector looked at relevant documentation and reviewed evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery.
p.7
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.7
Inspection activities
11 March 2025 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.8
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion