Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Mortimer Community College

Inspected 15 Jan 2025 · published 3 Apr 2025 · URN 108727

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Linkins (lead), Dan McKeating, Geoff Lumsdon, Karen Gammack, Kieran McGrane

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Jan 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Dan McKeating, Geoff Lumsdon, John Linkins, Karen Gammack, Kieran McGrane

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    NE33 4UG

  • Name on report verified

    Mortimer Community College

  • URN verified

    108727

Page 5 of 7
Page 5 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−21Mixedmore positive than 7% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveeffectivehigh qualitystrongenjoywell supportedproudeffectively
Criticismgapslacknot consistentlypersistent absencepoorpoorlynot well preparedinconsistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1179w−24
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,154
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 37%

Full report text

Inspection of Mortimer Community College Reading Road, South Shields, Tyne and Wear NE33 4UG

p.1

Inspection dates: 14 and 15 January 2025

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 14 and 15 January 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils speak highly of this welcoming and inclusive school. The school does a considerable amount of work to support the local community and charities. This work encourages pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Pastoral care is of a high quality. Staff ensure that pupils get support when they need it. Pupils behave well at the school. They share positive relationships with staff. A culture of mutual respect permeates the school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ positive pastoral experience is not matched by their academic outcomes. The school has high ambitions for all pupils to succeed. However, in several subjects, this ambition is not realised. Pupils, including the most disadvantaged, achieve less well than their peers nationally. They are not as well prepared for their next stage of education, employment or training as they might be.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school provides numerous opportunities for pupils to enjoy new experiences. These include educational visits to foreign countries, work experience weeks and undertaking the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award. Pupils value opportunities to discuss and debate new ideas in lessons. The form time programme helps pupils to engage in topical issues, learn more about managing money and looking after the environment.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has acted on some important school improvement priorities. For example, the structure of lessons and the questions that staff ask pupils are now more effective. However, the school’s plans to improve the quality of education pupils receive lack precision. As a result, pupils have not achieved as well as they might over time.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

What pupils will study in each subject has been carefully considered. Changes have been made to the key stage 4 curriculum in several subjects. Topics build clearly upon one another. Staff regularly recap on previous learning. This helps some pupils to remember more of what they have been taught.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The way that staff check what pupils know and can do is inconsistent. Gaps in pupils’ knowledge and skills remain unaddressed. Lessons are not adapted to fill these gaps. As a result, pupils do not gain a deep understanding of important topics. Additionally, activity choices in some lessons do not meet the needs of pupils well. This negatively impacts pupils’ learning.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has developed strategies to improve pupils’ literacy. However, these are not consistently used by all staff. Important vocabulary is not emphasised or understood in some lessons. Support for pupils at an early stage of learning to read is underdeveloped. Pupils’ low literacy levels are negatively impacting their learning, in some cases.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Staff value the opportunities they receive for professional development. The school has provided training to support improvement priorities. This training has included supporting pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Staff receive appropriate 14 and 15 January 2025

p.2

3

information on the needs of pupils with SEND. Pupils with SEND feel well supported by the school. However, some staff do not adapt lessons as well as they might. This impacts how well pupils with SEND learn the curriculum.

p.3

3

Some pupils do not attend school regularly enough. Persistent absence has not improved significantly over time. The school’s approach to addressing issues caused by poor attendance is not as carefully considered as it should be. When pupils miss learning because of absence, there is no consistent approach to remedying gaps that may arise. As a result, pupils who attend poorly, achieve less well than their peers.

p.3

3

The school’s careers programme informs and inspires pupils to consider a wide range of jobs. Pupils benefit from independent careers advice and guidance. Visiting speakers from local and national companies support pupil’s ambitions for their futures. Pupils understand how to stay healthy and safe. They have an adult they would speak to if something worried them. Pupils know the importance of being resilient and positive mental health.

p.3

3

Early career teachers are supported by the school on a programme that has been well tailored to their needs. Staff are proud to work at the school. The governing body passionately believes in what the school does. It supports the work of the school and provides funding to help vulnerable pupils gain new experiences. However, the governing body is not well informed about the quality of education on offer at the school. They have not effectively supported and challenged the school to improve this over time.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Staff do not consistently check what pupils know and can do before moving on to new learning. As a result, suitable adjustments to lessons are not made for all pupils, including those with SEND. Gaps in pupil’s knowledge and understanding persist. The school should ensure that staff respond effectively to what pupils do and, do not, know and plan future learning to address these gaps.  The school’s plans to improve the quality of education pupils receive lack precision. Some important priorities remain unaddressed. As a result, pupils are not well prepared for their next steps in education, employment or training. The school should evaluate the strategies that are having the most impact on tackling under-achievement and implement these at pace across the school.  The school’s work to improve the literacy of pupils, especially those at an early stage of learning to read, is underdeveloped. Some strategies are recent or are not

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

implemented consistently. As a result, pupil’s understanding of important vocabulary is not as secure as it might be. The school should ensure an effective programme to 14 and 15 January 2025

p.3

4

improve pupil’s literacy is in place, including for those at an early stage of learning to read or who are new to speaking English.  Some pupils do not attend school as often as they should. Persistent absence has not reduced significantly over time. This is leading to gaps in pupil’s knowledge and understanding, which the school has not successfully addressed. The school should ensure strategies to improve attendance are regularly evaluated and that there is a strong, shared understanding of the importance of good attendance across the school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 14 and 15 January 2025

p.4

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1117

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Chair of governing body Stephen Coldwell

p.5

School details

Website www.mortimercommunitycollege.co.uk

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 17 and 18 September 2019

p.5

Information about this school

 The school uses three providers of alternative education. Two are registered with the Department for Education. One is not registered with the Department for Education.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. 14 and 15 January 2025

p.5

6

 Inspectors met with the headteacher and other senior leaders. The lead inspector also spoke with members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in the following subjects: mathematics, science, modern foreign languages, geography and history. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with some pupils and teachers and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors met with leaders responsible for careers education at the school.  Inspectors spoke with pupils about their experience in lessons, enrichment opportunities and what it is like to attend the school.  Inspectors met with early career teachers and those who mentor them.  One inspector met with the leaders responsible for literacy across the school. One inspector observed a range of reading interventions taking place.

p.6

6

 Inspectors examined the school’s behaviour records and spoke with providers of alternative education.  Inspectors met with the special educational needs coordinator. They looked at a range of documentation, including education, health and care plans and individual learning plans. Inspectors also checked how pupils with SEND are supported in lessons.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in a range of situations, including in corridors, at breaktimes, at lunchtimes and in lessons. They also spoke to pupils about behaviour and bullying.  Inspectors considered the responses from parents and carers to the online parent

p.6

6

survey, Ofsted Parent View. This included the comments submitted via the free-text facility. Inspectors also considered responses to Ofsted’s online pupil and staff surveys.

p.6

Inspection team

John Linkins, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Dan McKeating His Majesty’s Inspector 14 and 15 January 2025

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion