Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's home run by Surrey County Council
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Surrey County Council
- Inspection date verified
26 Feb 2025
- Inspectors verified
Daniel Rankin
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
2784664
- URN verified
2784664
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person should ensure that the use of electronic door alarms is regularly reviewed, involving parents, children (if possible) and social workers, to consider if it continues to be necessary for safeguarding purposes in accordance with regulation 24. p.5
- The registered person should ensure that the use of locks is regularly reviewed, involving parents, children (if possible) and social workers, to consider if it continues to be necessary for safeguarding purposes in accordance with regulation 24. p.5
- The registered person should ensure that any consequences imposed to address poor behaviour are restorative in nature. p.5
- The registered person should ensure that staff understand the system for consequences and for rewarding and celebrating positive behaviour and recognising where children have managed situations well. p.5
- In particular, any rewards or consequences given should be consistent and part of the behaviour support plans. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance5
“Leaders have effective oversight and encourage learning from incidents.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,234
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2784664 1 Registered provider: Surrey County Council Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This local authority home provides care for up to two children who experience social and emotional difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
At the time of the inspection, one child was living at the home.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home and the manager registered with Ofsted in April 2024.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: not previously inspected
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: not applicable
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: not applicable Inspection report for children’s home: 2784664 2
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child was visiting their family at the time of the inspection and did not wish to speak to the inspector. However, feedback from the child’s extended family network is positive. They feel that the child is safe and describe the support the child receives as ‘second to none’. No other children have moved into or out of the home. The home’s ethos is characterised by building strong relationships and striving for the best for children.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child has experienced stability and made progress. They have developed good relationships with the staff and been helped to find ways to manage their feelings and behaviours safely and appropriately.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff promote the child’s leisure time and interests. Staff have supported and helped the child to pursue personal interests, such as go-karting, computing and other social interests. This has helped promote the child’s well-being and identity and has been an important factor in helping the child feel valued and cared for. The child has re-entered education after being absent for an extended period. The child has also been helped to spend more time with his family and to build friendships.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child’s wishes and feelings are listened to and captured effectively. Staff and managers regularly speak to the child about their wishes and feelings and take them into account. The manager ensures that feedback and views are routinely recorded. The child has not made any complaints, but the home has a complaints procedure in place, and the child knows that they can raise a complaint or a concern if they wish.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff support children with their education. The manager has worked with the local authority and the virtual school to secure a college placement for the child. When issues arise, such as with attendance, staff and managers work with the provider and virtual schools to try to help the child overcome them. When out of education, staff support the child with learning in the home.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff and managers promote family relationships and friendships. This has included supporting the child to visit a parent internationally more than once. Family members are also welcomed into the home and visit regularly. Promoting social connections supports the child’s identity and helps them feel valued.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The home environment is of a very good standard throughout. The home is well furnished and decorated, and maintenance or repair work takes place in good time. All shared areas of the home are clean and tidy. Children’s bedrooms are large and can be personalised. However, the use of alarms on all bedroom doors has not been routinely reviewed. Electronic locks are also used on doors to shared spaces without a clear or current rationale. Inspection report for children’s home: 2784664 3
p.2
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff know the safeguarding procedures, and managers encourage them to raise any potential concerns. When incidents occur, staff take them seriously. Leaders have effective oversight and encourage learning from incidents.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff have positive relationships with the child. They know them well and have a thorough understanding of their strengths and vulnerabilities. Staff are aided by risk assessments and behaviour support plans, which are detailed and individualised. Plans and assessments identify behavioural triggers, preventative measures, and de-escalation responses. Staff and managers update plans and assessments regularly.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff do not use physical intervention, and instead focus on using de-escalation techniques. Staff have been trained to use physical interventions and can explain how they would use them if needed.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
When children leave the home without permission, staff follow procedures and respond appropriately. This includes carrying out searches or making other enquiries to help find children. Staff and managers work with other agencies, including the police, to help children return safely and to prevent repeated incidents. Missing-from-home records are detailed and accurate.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff and managers encourage positive behaviour. Staff help increase the child’s understanding of risky or acceptable behaviour. However, boundaries and expectations are not always clear for the child, and rewards or consequences are not consistently given or clearly recorded.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The registered manager is suitably qualified, competent, and committed to supporting staff and children. The manager is dual registered with another home located adjacently.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Changes in senior staff members, including the deputy manager and the responsible individual, have meant that leadership has sometimes been under strain. However, the manager is now assisted by a competent and committed deputy and a competent responsible individual. There is a good working relationship among all senior staff.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager, deputy manager and responsible individual have high expectations and aspirations for the home. Staff speak positively about working in the home and with each other. There is generally a positive and child-focused ethos in the home among the whole staff team. Staff support and trust each other.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff receive regular supervision and speak positively about this being effective. The manager and deputy have an ‘open door’ culture with staff that encourages ad-hoc discussions when needed. Team meetings take place regularly to ensure that all staff are informed about events and have a space to express their views. Inspection report for children’s home: 2784664 4 Leaders and managers ensure that there is a good induction process for new staff when they start. Staff speak positively about having received a range of training, which they feel has given them all the necessary tools to be able to support children in the home competently.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
External feedback is positive in relation to children’s care and the staff and managers working in the home. This includes feedback from local authority social workers and education and youth offending professionals.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Children’s files are generally of a good standard, case recordings are professional and detailed, and the language used is child focused. The home meets its aims as identified in its statement of purpose. Inspection report for children’s home: 2784664 5
p.4
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that the use of electronic door alarms is regularly reviewed, involving parents, children (if possible) and social workers, to consider if it continues to be necessary for safeguarding purposes in accordance with regulation 24. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 15, paragraph 3.10) The registered person should ensure that the use of locks is regularly reviewed, involving parents, children (if possible) and social workers, to consider if it continues to be necessary for safeguarding purposes in accordance with regulation 24. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 16, paragraph 3.16) The registered person should ensure that any consequences imposed to address poor behaviour are restorative in nature. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 46, paragraph 9.38)
p.5
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that staff understand the system for consequences and for rewarding and celebrating positive behaviour and recognising where children have managed situations well. In particular, any rewards or consequences given should be consistent and part of the behaviour support plans. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 46, paragraph 9.39)
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2784664 6
p.5
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Surrey County Council
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Quadrant Court, 35 Guildford Road, Woking GU22 7QQ
p.6
Inspector
Daniel Rankin, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2784664 7 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion