Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Bankside Primary School
Summary
Matthew Harrington (lead), Alison Black, David Taylor, James Canniford
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Feb 2025
- Inspectors verified
Alison Black, David Taylor, James Canniford, Matthew Harrington
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
LS8 5AW
- Name on report verified
Bankside Primary School
- URN verified
107901
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In less developed subjects, the school has not precisely identified the important knowledge that pupils must learn. p.2
- The school has not clearly defined the specific knowledge that pupils must learn across the curriculum as they progress through the school. p.3
- It has broken down the skills that pupils must learn. p.2
- This makes it difficult for teachers to prioritise what pupils must be taught. p.2
- They recognise the need to establish systems to check that the actions taken by the school are having the intended impact. p.3
- The school should ensure that 4 and 5 February 2025 p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics7
“This supports pupils well to develop a love of reading.” p.3Teaching & assessment4
“Within lessons, teachers do not consistently explain new concepts clearly.” p.2Progress & outcomes4
“Pupils’ achievement in national tests in recent years has been too low.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,176
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Bankside Primary School Shepherds Lane, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS8 5AW
p.1
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 4 and 5 February 2025
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
This school is a welcoming and friendly place for pupils. They feel, and are, safe. Strong relationships between staff and pupils are evident across the school. The school has established clear processes to work with parents and carers prior to pupils joining the school. The ‘Birth to Bankside’ programme enables parents and children to become familiar with the school from an early stage. Consequently, children settle quickly into the early years. A significant number of pupils arrive at the school at different times of the year. They are welcomed by their peers and soon make friends.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has worked to improve pupils’ behaviour. The school has ensured that expectations are clear for pupils and staff to understand. Consequently, incidents of poor behaviour have significantly reduced. Pupils move around school calmly. They play well with each other at playtimes. Pupils behave well in class. They sometimes become less engaged when work in lessons is too easy or too difficult.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school is going through a significant period of change and improvement. Newly established leaders are resolute in their ambition to provide a high-quality education for pupils. Pupils’ achievement in national tests in recent years has been too low. Pupils are benefitting from an improved curriculum and greater ambition but there is still some variation in the quality of education that they receive.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school’s curriculum is broad and ambitious. Some subjects are established. Others are less well developed. The school has ensured that the curriculum is appropriately sequenced. It has broken down the skills that pupils must learn. In less developed subjects, the school has not precisely identified the important knowledge that pupils must learn. This makes it difficult for teachers to prioritise what pupils must be taught. Within lessons, teachers do not consistently explain new concepts clearly. On occasion, they provide pupils with too much information. This prevents pupils from understanding clearly and using and applying what they have learned fully.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school supports pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) in a variety of ways. Pupils who access the Rainbow Room are taught a bespoke curriculum. The school has a clear understanding of the needs of these pupils. It provides bespoke learning opportunities that support their individual learning and development needs well. Within classes, pupils with SEND actively participate in lessons. The school has established ways to identify pupils’ individual needs. However, it does not consistently ensure that steps to support pupils’ learning are precise enough. This makes it difficult for the school to to evaluate the progress that pupils with SEND make in their learning.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has implemented a consistent approach to the teaching of phonics. Staff provide regular opportunities for children in the early years to develop their communication, language and vocabulary. Children in the early years enjoy listening to, and participating in, stories, rhymes and songs. Children learn the sounds that letters 4 and 5 February 2025
p.2
3
make from the beginning of their time in Reception. Pupils learn to use their knowledge of phonics to help them to read and write an increasing range of sentences. Pupils read books that are matched to their phonics knowledge. This helps them learn to read with fluency and accuracy. The school has recently updated and replenished the selection of books available to pupils. This now includes books from a variety of cultures and genres. This supports pupils well to develop a love of reading.
p.3
3
Children in the early years engage positively in a range of age-appropriate activities. Staff have established strong relationships with children. This helps children to become confident and independent learners. Sometimes, staff do not extend children’s learning consistently well. This hampers children’s progression through the curriculum.
p.3
3
Visitors to school, including community police officers, teach pupils about how to keep safe, including online. Pupils value these opportunities. Older pupils speak confidently about what they have learned recently about knife crime, smoking and vaping. Some pupils do not demonstrate the same depth of knowledge about growing up in modern Britain. They have a limited understanding of fundamental British values and protected characteristics.
p.3
3
Over time, pupils’ rates of absence have been significantly above national figures. The school has implemented rigorous processes to check that pupils attend school regularly. These are beginning to positively impact on pupils’ rates of attendance and punctuality. However, the school recognises that there is still work to do.
p.3
3
The governing board has also been through a period of change. It has focused its actions on ensuring that the school site is a safe place for pupils and staff to be. Governors have overseen the development of the school’s curriculum. They recognise the need to establish systems to check that the actions taken by the school are having the intended impact. Most staff consider the changes in school to be positive. However, some are concerned about the impact on their workload. The school does not have a clear process for leaders, including those with responsibility for governance, to check that its actions are improving staff workload and well-being.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school has not clearly defined the specific knowledge that pupils must learn across the curriculum as they progress through the school. It is difficult for teachers to accurately identify and address pupils’ gaps in learning. The school should ensure that 4 and 5 February 2025
p.3
4
its curriculum clearly identifies the knowledge that pupils must learn alongside the skills. The school does not carefully check that the changes it makes are having the intended impact. Weaknesses are not consistently or precisely identified. As a consequence, the school is not clear about whether actions taken to improve the school are working, or what the consequences are on staff workload and well-being. The school should further refine its strategies to check the impact of its actions on pupils’ learning and staff workload. The school’s strategies to improve attendance are not successfully reaching some pupils well enough. Some pupils do not attend school regularly enough. They miss out on important learning opportunities. The school should continue its work with families to improve pupils’ rates of attendance.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 4 and 5 February 2025
p.4
School details
Dates of previous inspection 28 and 29 January 2020, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The headteacher started in September 2023. The school runs a breakfast club. The school’s nursery includes provision for two-year-olds. The school does not currently use any alternative provision. A children’s centre operates on the same site as the school. The headteacher is responsible for this provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 4 and 5 February 2025
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors spoke to the headteacher, deputy headteacher and assistant headteachers. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, science and art and design. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the
p.6
6
extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors spoke to parents at the beginning and end of the school day. They also reviewed responses to Ofsted’s parent survey, Ofsted Parent View. Inspectors met with staff and reviewed responses to Ofsted’s staff survey. The lead inspector held separate meetings with representatives from the school’s governing board and the local authority improvement partner.
p.6
Inspection team
Matthew Harrington, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
David Taylor Ofsted Inspector 4 and 5 February 2025
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion