Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

High Tunstall College of Science

Inspected 29 Jan 2025 · published 26 Mar 2025 · URN 111748

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dan McKeating (lead), Bernard Clark, Jill Bowe, Nicola Reed, Philip Wheatley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Jan 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Bernard Clark, Dan McKeating, Jill Bowe, Nicola Reed, Philip Wheatley

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    TS26 0LQ

  • Name on report verified

    High Tunstall College of Science

  • URN verified

    111748

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+27Mostly positivemore positive than 21% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisevery effectivehigh expectationsconsistentlyeffectivestrongambitioushappypositive
Criticisminconsistenciesnot consistentlynot securevariablegapslimitedvariation

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1067w+24
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,043
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Inspection of High Tunstall College of Science Elwick Road, West Park, Hartlepool TS26 0LQ

p.1

Inspection dates: 28 and 29 January 2025

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 28 and 29 January 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

High Tunstall College is a very inclusive school, where pupils are happy and safe. It is a diverse community, where pupils are known as individuals. Pastoral care is strong. The school often goes to great lengths to support pupils and their families. As a result of this care, relationships between pupils and staff are positive.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has high expectations. However, there are inconsistencies in the quality of education that pupils receive. As a result, the depth of pupils’ knowledge and what they can remember is varied. This is also reflected in published examination results that show pupils, particularly those who are disadvantaged, do not achieve as well as they should.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Lessons are focused, purposeful and typically free from distractions. Pupils are polite and conduct themselves maturely, including at social times. They make an active contribution to school life in the various leadership roles they are offered as part of the school’s ‘leadership academy’. Pupils who are in the ‘make a difference’ team help their peers when they need support. Those who are the school’s ‘pupil poet laureates’ write poetry for significant school occasions.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school’s programme to support pupils’ personal development is very effective. Pupils are offered an extensive range of opportunities to develop their interests and talents. Pupils appreciate this offer and often take the lead in running extra-curricular clubs.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school’s curriculum is broad and ambitious. However, across the curriculum, the impact of teaching is variable. Pupils do not secure or develop deep knowledge and understanding sufficiently. The school has identified the important knowledge and skills that pupils should learn. However, in some subjects, this needs refining so it is more precise and embedded where recent changes have been made.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Teachers are subject specialists. They explain concepts clearly. However, they do not consistently check pupils’ understanding closely enough, correct pupils’ misconceptions or address gaps in pupils’ learning in a timely way. This limits the progress through the curriculum that some pupils make.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are supported closely. Pupils who access the additionally resourced provisions benefit from specialist support. The school identifies pupils’ needs quickly. Teachers receive detailed information about the ways to meet pupils’ needs. These strategies are used consistently and pupils access the curriculum appropriately. However, pupils with SEND are limited by the same inconsistencies in the curriculum as their peers and do not achieve as well as they should.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school recognises the importance of reading. It has recently begun work to improve this part of the curriculum. This work is in its infancy. The school has not identified the weakest readers across the school consistently. This means that some pupils are not 28 and 29 January 2025

p.2

3

receiving the support they need to become confident readers and access the curriculum securely.

p.3

3

Leaders’ work to ensure that pupils attend school regularly is effective. The school works successfully to support pupils when it is needed. Pupils’ attendance, including for those who are vulnerable, is high.

p.3

3

The school’s personal, social, health education (PSHE) programme is planned carefully. Pupils learn about important issues, such as healthy relationships and online safety. The school adapts this programme according to emerging needs. The programme teaches pupils about British values, such as democracy and the rule of law.

p.3

3

The careers programme helps pupils to make informed decisions about their next steps. Pupils learn about the world of work through visitors to school and by undertaking work experience.

p.3

3

Leaders are respected by staff and the wider community. They are committed to inclusion and ensuring that pupils remain engaged with their education, particularly when they face barriers. There is some variation in how consistent the school’s expectations relating to the teaching of the curriculum are reviewed.

p.3

3

Governors are skilled and committed to their duties. Staff appreciate leaders’ focus on their well-being and feel supported with their workload.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The implementation of the curriculum does not consistently enable pupils to learn, remember and apply key concepts in sufficient depth. Many pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, are not achieving as well as they could. The school must improve the implementation of the curriculum, so that pupils secure their understanding of important knowledge and achieve more across the subjects that they study.  The school’s programme to support pupils with their reading is in its infancy. In some cases, the pupils who could benefit from have not been identified and support programmes have not been fully rolled out. This means that some pupils are not given the support they need to overcome barriers to reading and the wider learning this underpins. The school needs to intensify its actions to identify swiftly those pupils who need extra help with their reading and implement the support that they need rapidly.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 There is some variation in how well the school’s policies for teaching the curriculum and checking pupils’ subject-specific learning are implemented across subjects. In some cases, variations in the depth of pupils’ understanding in subjects are not 28 and 29 January 2025

p.3

4

sufficiently identified or acted upon. The school should work with staff to further apply the school’s policies for the teaching and assessment of important concepts in the subjects that they study, so that pupils’ learning can be deepened.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 28 and 29 January 2025

p.4

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1387

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 1 and 2 July 2021

p.5

Information about this school

 The school has specially resourced provision for pupils with SEND. This provision is for pupils with autism and medical and physical disabilities. The school has a second specially resourced provision for pupils with moderate learning difficulties.  The school currently uses one unregistered alternative provision.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 28 and 29 January 2025

p.5

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with members of the governing body. Inspectors reviewed documentation relating to governance, including minutes from governor meetings.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, geography, modern languages and design and technology. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also visited lessons from a range of other subjects.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the

p.6

6

extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors met with groups of pupils formally during the inspection and spoke with them at social times and in lessons.  Inspectors met with groups of staff formally during the inspection and spoke with them throughout the inspection. Inspectors also considered the opinions expressed through Ofsted’s staff survey.  Inspectors took account of responses to the Ofsted Parent View survey, including the free-text responses.

p.6

Inspection team

Dan McKeating, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Jill Bowe Ofsted Inspector 28 and 29 January 2025

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion