Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Ungraded school inspection

St Patrick's Roman Catholic Primary School, Walton-le-Dale

Inspected 5 Feb 2025 · published 26 Mar 2025 · URN 119640

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Trish Merritt

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Feb 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Trish Merritt

  • Postcode verified

    PR5 4HD

  • Name on report verified

    St Patrick’s Roman Catholic Primary School, Walton-le-Dale

  • URN verified

    119640

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 19% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesuccessfullyeffectiveenjoypositivesupportivestrongambitioushappy
Criticismnot stronggapsstruggleseriousfalling behindconcernsvariationbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1372w+40
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,371
about usual (typical 1282)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 51
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 3
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 73%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Inspection of a school judged good for overall effectiveness before September 2024: St Patrick’s Roman Catholic Primary School, Walton-le-Dale Higher Walton Road, Walton-le-Dale, Preston, Lancashire PR5 4HD

p.1

Outcome

St Patrick’s Roman Catholic Primary School, Walton-le-Dale has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at the previous inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel happy and safe in the school’s welcoming environment. They work alongside staff to welcome any newcomers to the school. Pupils know and understand the school’s values of ‘learn, grow and shine’. They live these values out through their confident, positive behaviour. Pupils talk to trusted adults about any worries that they have.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school serves and cares for families well. It forms strong, productive relationships which put pupils’ interests first. Many parents and carers appreciate how supportive and approachable staff are. Pupils say staff help them with their work and they try their best in return. They rise to leaders’ expectations and many pupils achieve well.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are proud of the school’s diverse community. They speak readily about equality and enjoy learning about different cultures. Pupils take part in various activities which extend their talents and interests. These include residential visits, retreats and trips to a local wildlife sanctuary. They take on a range of responsible roles, such as school councillors, librarians, head boy or head girl. Pupils learn about nature and sustainability, such as through extra-curricular clubs in gardening and environmental protection. They enjoy learning about the ducks, deer and hedgehogs who visit the school grounds.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has developed an ambitious curriculum. It has identified the knowledge that pupils need to learn from early years through to Year 6. The school has recently reviewed the curriculum. This has ensured that pupils can build their knowledge in manageable steps. Pupils typically achieve well and are well prepared for secondary school. 4 and 5 February 2025

p.1

2

Pupils’ attainment in mathematics in the 2024 national assessment at the end of Year 6 was not as strong as it has been previously. The school has acted quickly to make positive changes to how the mathematics curriculum is taught. Pupils make helpful connections to their previous learning. For example, pupils gain fluency with times tables work and use this knowledge successfully to gain an understanding of fractions later in the year.

p.2

2

Occasionally, the curriculum is not delivered as well as the school intends. Sometimes, teachers do not select activities that match pupils’ needs or the subject content that is being taught. At times, this means that some pupils do not learn new knowledge as securely as they could. Since the previous inspection, the school has made progress in making sure that there are clear systems in place to check pupils’ learning across different subjects. However, at times, staff do not spot pupils’ misconceptions quickly. This leads to gaps in pupils’ learning.

p.2

2

Typically, staff support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) well. The school enlists the help of specialist agencies when necessary. However, there is some variation in how well the school identifies the specific needs of some pupils with SEND. This is especially true for pupils with social, emotional and mental health difficulties. As a result, staff have not had sufficient support to meet these pupils’ needs. This means that a small number of pupils with SEND struggle to learn.

p.2

2

Children settle well into school in the early years. They develop skills such as coordination and teamwork through regular physical activity. The early years curriculum has a firm focus on communication and language. This prepares children well for learning in Year 1.

p.2

2

The number of pupils meeting the phonics standard last year at the end of Year 1 fell below the national average. Since then, the school has sharpened its approach to teaching early reading. Ongoing training has ensured that lessons are delivered well, so that pupils are doing much better currently. Teachers quickly identify those who are falling behind and give additional support. As a result, an increasing number read fluently. A love of reading is promoted well across school. Pupils enjoy listening to staff reading to them each day. This helps pupils read with expression and learn new words.

p.2

2

Pupils’ behaviour across school is respectful. Staff have worked successfully to ensure a consistent approach. Pupils listen well and learn in a calm environment. The school has supportive systems in place to make sure pupils attend regularly and on time. Pupils’ attendance rates are high.

p.2

2

Leaders work successfully to promote pupils’ personal development. Pupils learn about bicycle and road safety. This helps prepare them for managing the risk of heavy traffic outside the school.

p.2

2

Governors know the school well. Governors are aware of the school’s areas of strength and development. Staff value the support that they receive. They feel the school cares for their well-being and workload when introducing new ways of working. 4 and 5 February 2025

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 From time to time, the curriculum is not delivered as well as the school intends. Sometimes, teachers do not select activities that match pupils’ needs or help them learn the curriculum content. This means that some pupils do not learn as well as they could. The school should ensure that the curriculum is delivered consistently well so that all pupils can learn successfully.  Sometimes, teachers do not check pupils’ understanding carefully and do not spot misconceptions. As a result, learning moves on too quickly while pupils develop gaps in their knowledge. The school should ensure that staff have the necessary expertise to check pupils’ learning and address misconceptions so that pupils learn the curriculum with greater success.  The identification of the specific SEND needs of some pupils is not as precise as it could be, especially for pupils with emotional and mental health needs. This means that on

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

some occasions, pupils struggle to get the support they need. The school should ensure that staff gain the expertise that they need to identify and support pupils with SEND more effectively.

p.3

Background

Until September 2024, on a graded (section 5) inspection we gave schools an overall effectiveness grade, in addition to the key and provision judgements. Overall effectiveness grades given before September 2024 will continue to be visible on school inspection reports and on Ofsted’s website. From September 2024, graded inspections will not include an overall effectiveness grade. This school was, before September 2024, judged to be good for its overall effectiveness.

p.3

Background

We have now inspected the school to determine whether it has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at that previous inspection. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school’s work has improved significantly or that it may not be as strong as it was at the last inspection, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection. A graded inspection is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good for overall effectiveness in January 2020. 4 and 5 February 2025

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 4 and 5 February 2025

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 8 and 9 January 2020, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 Since the previous inspection, a new headteacher has been appointed.  The school is a voluntary-aided Catholic school. The last section 48 inspection was in June 2019. The next section 48 is due in 2027.  The school does not currently make use of any alternative provision.  The school runs a before-school club for pupils.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in her evaluation of the school. 4 and 5 February 2025

p.5

6

 The inspector met with the headteacher and other leaders. She also spoke with a representative of the diocese and the local authority. The inspector met members of the governing body.  The inspector considered the responses from parents, both in person and through Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text responses. She also reviewed the responses to Ofsted’s online staff and pupil surveys.  The inspector reviewed a range of documents, including records of behaviour, case studies and attendance records. The inspector also examined the school’s self- evaluation and school improvement plan documents.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspector visited a sample of lessons, spoke to pupils and staff, reviewed pupils’

p.6

6

work and listened to pupils read to a familiar adult.

p.6

Inspection team

Trish Merritt, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector 4 and 5 February 2025

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion