Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Kingsleigh Primary School
Summary
Angela Folland (lead), Jyotsna Paranjape, Steve Smith, Tom Brewer
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Feb 2025
- Inspectors verified
Angela Folland, Jyotsna Paranjape, Steve Smith, Tom Brewer
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
BH10 5HT
- Name on report verified
Kingsleigh Primary School
- URN verified
142428
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school must develop staff’s understanding and use of effective pedagogy so that pupils learn well across subjects and age groups, including in the early years. 11 and 12 February 2025 p.3
- They ensure that pupils gain the knowledge they need to read fluently and confidently. p.3
- ‘The Cove’ and ‘Rockpool’ provisions are effective in supporting pupils with more complex needs to learn well from their individual starting points. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
SEND & inclusion3
“Pupils with SEND learn well.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,029
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Kingsleigh Primary School Hadow Road, Kinson, Bournemouth, Dorset BH10 5HT
p.1
Inspection dates: 11 and 12 February 2025
p.1
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good
p.1
The headteacher of this school is Suzy Hayward. This school is part of a single-academy trust, Kingsleigh Primary School, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Rachel Cornish. 11 and 12 February 2025
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school’s values of respect, belonging and aspiration are part of daily life. Pupils learn how to show these values in their learning and play. From the Nursery onwards, children learn self-discipline and motivation. Pupils appreciate the rewards and recognition they receive for displaying these values. They particularly enjoy being awarded the purple jumper. Consequently, most pupils in the school behave well.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
After a period of instability, new leadership has helped to stabilise the school. The school is ambitious for pupils. Staff have high expectations. Pupils meet those expectations. They listen attentively, follow instructions and set to tasks quickly.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ enjoyment of learning extends to the many extra-curricular opportunities the school provides. Pupils, including those from disadvantaged backgrounds and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), benefit from these experiences. Pupils appreciate the leadership opportunities which include membership of the school’s ‘KPS Crew’. Pupils, elected by their peers, make a positive contribution to life at the school by choosing different aspects of school life to improve.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Since the last inspection, the school has focused on designing an ambitious and coherent curriculum. This work has picked up pace during this academic year. Changes to curriculum organisation and accountability have been effective. As a result, pupils’ learning has improved significantly. While this is evident in the quality of education pupils currently receive, it is not reflected in the outcomes of national tests. Across the curriculum, pupils know more and remember more. The curriculum is well matched and interesting for pupils. As a result they enjoy their learning and work hard.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
In the wider curriculum, the school has identified the core knowledge it wants pupils to learn. This specific knowledge is designed to build progressively, from the Nursery to Year 6. Staff have worked with the local high school to ensure knowledge for Year 5 and 6 pupils prepares them well for the content of the key stage 3 curriculum. Pupils learn subject-specific vocabulary. Teaching ensures that pupils recall and explain their learning well, using appropriate technical terms.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Teachers check pupils’ understanding regularly in a variety of ways. For example, questions are used well to identify misconceptions and deepen thinking. Staff identify and support individuals and groups to help pupils to keep up. They ensure pupils have additional teaching on knowledge or concepts that have not been secured and are required for future learning. The school is developing the way in which it wants the curriculum delivered. In curriculum areas such mathematics and early reading, the school has agreed teaching strategies that deliver the curriculum effectively. However, teaching of the wider curriculum does not follow the same effective approaches consistently. At times it is too variable in quality and impact. Pupils sometimes do not learn as well as they could in these subjects. 11 and 12 February 2025
p.2
3
The strategic oversight of all aspects of the school’s work has not been consistently strong. However, work to improve governors’ oversight is underway. Governors have received training that is helping them to begin to monitor the work of the school with greater rigour.
p.3
3
Pupils learn to read well. In the Nursery, children enjoy a range of rhymes, songs and stories. Children in Reception quickly start to learn phonics. Adults teach with confidence and accuracy because their subject knowledge is secure. They ensure that pupils gain the knowledge they need to read fluently and confidently. Older pupils enjoy the ‘12 recommended reads’ the school has identified for each year group to enjoy. The school has strengthened the curriculum links between reading and writing. Consequently, pupils’ writing is more sophisticated and technically accurate.
p.3
3
Pupils with SEND learn well. This is because the school identifies pupils’ needs accurately. Staff adapt learning well to take account of pupils’ needs. ‘The Cove’ and ‘Rockpool’ provisions are effective in supporting pupils with more complex needs to learn well from their individual starting points.
p.3
3
The school monitors and analyses behaviour closely. Some pupils have individual behaviour response plans that help the school to provide appropriate support so that pupils can manage their behaviour. Consistent and fair use of the revised behaviour policy has reduced suspensions.
p.3
3
Pupils benefit from strong pastoral support. The focus on mental health and well-being supports those pupils who struggle with self-esteem or find it difficult to manage their emotions. Skilled staff welcome vulnerable pupils in the morning and help to prepare them for learning. This sets them up to be successful.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In the wider curriculum, teaching strategies are not as well-developed as they are in the core subjects. This means that teaching in some subjects has a variable impact and pupils do not learn as well as they could. The school must develop staff’s understanding and use of effective pedagogy so that pupils learn well across subjects and age groups, including in the early years. 11 and 12 February 2025
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 11 and 12 February 2025
p.4
School details
Local authority Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 14 and 15 November 2023, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is a much larger than average sized primary school. The proportion of pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds is above average and there is well above the average proportion of pupils with SEND. The headteacher was appointed in September 2024.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 11 and 12 February 2025
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school's education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, history, science and religious education. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, deputy headteacher, assistant headteachers, special educational needs coordinator, curriculum leaders, teaching and support staff. The lead inspector met with representatives from the board of directors, including the chair. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single
p.6
6
central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The lead inspector listened to some pupils read to an adult. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school site. In addition, they met with pupils informally and formally to hear their views. Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, including free-text responses. Inspectors also took into consideration responses to the staff and pupil surveys. Inspectors examined a range of documentation provided by the school, including the school’s improvement plan.
p.6
Inspection team
Angela Folland, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Jyotsna Paranjape Ofsted Inspector 11 and 12 February 2025
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion