Schools & FE · Ungraded school inspection
Wold Academy
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Feb 2025
- Inspectors verified
Rebecca Clayton
- Postcode verified
HU5 5QG
- Name on report verified
Wold Academy
- URN verified
139968
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This means they frequently miss out on learning and are at risk of falling behind their peers. p.2
- This means that they frequently miss out on learning and are at risk of falling behind their peers. p.3
- If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately. 11 and 12 February 2025 p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics5
“Staff teach phonics effectively.” p.2Personal development4
“Pupils achieve well in their learning and personal development.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,386
- about usual (typical 1282)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a school judged good for overall effectiveness before September 2024: Wold Academy Wold Road, Hull HU5 5QG
p.1
Inspection dates: 11 and 12 February 2025
p.1
Outcome
Wold Academy has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at the previous inspection.
p.1
Outcome
The principal of this school is Julia Eley. This school is part of David Ross Education Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Stuart Burns, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by David Ross.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Wold Academy is an extremely warm and caring school. The school sets high expectations for pupils’ learning and behaviour. In lessons, pupils help each other if they get stuck. They listen attentively when their classmates are explaining an answer. Pupils enjoy working in groups. Pupils understand there are different types of bullying. It is not an issue, but pupils are sure that adults would step in to help if it ever happened.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school provides a broad and ambitious curriculum. Pupils enjoy learning. They say that teachers make lessons interesting and fun. Pupils achieve well in their learning and personal development. They acquire the skills and knowledge they need to become successful, happy and well-rounded citizens of the future.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school provides pupils with many well-considered experiences that broaden their understanding of the world. Pupils take part in after-school clubs, such as crafts, judo, Lego and chess. They benefit from going on a wide variety of trips and residential visits. Pupils are proud of the way that they represent the school in different sports events, both locally and within the trust. Pupils have opportunities to take on different roles in school. For example, the school council is working on how to improve outdoor play. 11 and 12 February 2025
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has a relatively new leadership team in place. They have been supported by the trust well. Since the last inspection, leaders at all levels made many positive changes to strengthen the curriculum. The curriculum is broad and ambitious and provides staff with guidance to help them to deliver it well. Staff are knowledgeable and present new information clearly to pupils. This is helping pupils with their learning. This is particularly the case for writing in early years and key stage 1. The introduction of ‘widgets’ means that all pupils, and particularly those pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), make strong progression through the writing curriculum.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school makes sure everyone receives the support they need. The school has an accurate understanding of the needs of pupils with SEND. Those who may need additional support are identified promptly. Staff use their expertise to provide pupils with SEND with in-class support and resources. This helps these pupils to learn the curriculum alongside their peers.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Staff teach phonics effectively. They show pupils how to read fluently, for instance by encouraging pupils to sound words out in their heads. Any pupil who falls behind in learning to read gets extra support to help them catch up. Consequently, many pupils soon become competent readers. Pupils have positive attitudes to reading. They are fond of the stories they read together as a class. Their love of reading is fostered from the moment they start at the school. Children are immersed in a world of books as part of the school’s language-rich early years provision. Reception Year staff are experts in developing children’s communication and language skills.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Within lessons, teachers check pupils’ understanding effectively to find out how well they are learning. This is done through questions and assessment checks. In mathematics and English, these checks are used well to highlight gaps in key knowledge or misconceptions. These gaps are then closed straight away through further teaching or small intervention groups. In some wider curriculum lessons, however, teachers do not use these assessment checks as effectively as they could. This means that some pupils move on to new learning before they are ready.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The new school leadership team has made attendance a priority. Over the past three years, attendance has been low. The school has made some changes to how they check on pupils’ absence and as a result, there are some small improvements. The school has a clear overview of the causes of absence and is working hard with families where attendance is low. However, some pupils with SEND do not attend as regularly as they could. This means they frequently miss out on learning and are at risk of falling behind their peers.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The provision for personal, social and health education teaches pupils how to keep themselves healthy and safe. Pupils learn how to maintain positive relationships and how to look after their physical and mental health. Pupils benefit further from a wide range of enrichment opportunities. These include a variety of clubs that develop pupils’ sporting 11 and 12 February 2025
p.2
3
and artistic talents, as well as memorable trips and visits. The school makes sure that all pupils can benefit from these opportunities.
p.3
3
Staff value the support and guidance that they receive from the trust. This ensures that they are confident in delivering the various subject curriculums. Staff also value the school’s commitment to reducing their workload. This helps staff to fulfil their roles effectively and supports their well-being.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Sometimes in the wider curriculum, staff move pupils onto new learning before identifying and addressing any knowledge gaps and misconceptions. This hinders pupils from being able to build up their knowledge as well as they could. The school should ensure that pupils have secure foundational knowledge and understanding on which they can build and deepen their learning successfully. The school’s approaches to reducing the absence of pupils with SEND are not as effective as they could be. This means that they frequently miss out on learning and are at risk of falling behind their peers. The school should review and enhance their approaches to tackle low attendance so these pupils attend as regularly as their peers.
p.3
Background
Until September 2024, on a graded (section 5) inspection we gave schools an overall effectiveness grade, in addition to the key and provision judgements. Overall effectiveness grades given before September 2024 will continue to be visible on school inspection reports and on Ofsted’s website. From September 2024 graded inspections will not include an overall effectiveness grade. This school was, before September 2024, judged good for its overall effectiveness.
p.3
Background
We have now inspected the school to determine whether it has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at that previous inspection. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school’s work has improved significantly or that it may not be as strong as it was at the last inspection, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection. A graded inspection is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately. 11 and 12 February 2025
p.3
4
This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good for overall effectiveness in May 2021.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 11 and 12 February 2025
p.4
School details
Local authority Kingston Upon Hull City Council
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 12 and 13 May 2021, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of the David Ross Education Trust. The school has provision for two-year-olds. The school uses one registered alternative provider. The new principal took up their post in January 2025. The school has an interim deputy principal and an interim assistant principal. The school runs a before- and after-school club.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. The inspector discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 11 and 12 February 2025
p.5
6
The inspector spoke to the principal, interim deputy principal and interim assistant principal. The inspector met with members of the trust leadership team, the chair of the trust education committee and the chair of the academy scrutiny panel. The inspector visited a sample of lessons, spoke to pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspector considered the responses to the Ofsted Parent View questionnaire and the free-text comments that were submitted. She also took account of the responses to the confidential Ofsted staff survey. She gathered the views of staff and pupils
p.6
Inspection team
Rebecca Clayton, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector 11 and 12 February 2025
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion