Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Kinlet CofE Primary School

Inspected 15 Jan 2025 · URN 123480

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sam Cosgrove (lead), Azizan Kabil

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Jan 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Azizan Kabil, Sam Cosgrove

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    DY12 3BG

  • Name on report verified

    Kinlet CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    123480

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+22Mostly positivemore positive than 18% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelovehappyenjoyambitiousimprovingfeel safeconsistent
Criticismnot alwaysgapsweaknessesnot sufficientlydisruptionnot strongnot well sequenceddo not know

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1031w+20
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,000
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
16%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Inspection of Kinlet CofE Primary School School Lane, Bewdley, Kinlet, Worcestershire DY12 3BG

p.1

Inspection dates: 14 and 15 January 2025

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 14 and 15 January 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Kinlet is a calm, happy school, where pupils feel safe and value the friendships that they make. The values of respect, tolerance, thankfulness, resilience and courage are important for this school. Staff use these to build a culture where pupils ‘love to learn, learn to love’.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils study a broad range of subjects. They enjoy the trips and experiences that the school has started to introduce. However, the school is still working to establish a sufficiently ambitious curriculum. Currently, the quality of education that some pupils receive requires further improvement. As a result, pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), do not know and remember what they should. Consequently, they are not sufficiently well prepared for the next stage of their education.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ behaviour is improving. Most pupils follow the school’s rules and routines well. However, there is still some low-level disruption in lessons. Staff do not routinely tackle these quickly enough. This can distract pupils and hinders their learning.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has introduced some clubs, including football and gymnastics . Pupils have opportunities to take on leadership roles, including being selected as ‘young leaders’ or as school librarians. However, these roles are not fully established across the school.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school prioritises the effective teaching of early reading. Its approach to teaching phonics is consistent. All staff are well trained. They check pupils’ phonics knowledge effectively. This means that staff know exactly what pupils need to learn next. Pupils speak enthusiastically about their love of reading. They enjoy adults reading the class book to them. However, the reading curriculum beyond phonics does not define the key skills and knowledge that pupils need to know. Consequently, previous learning is not built upon.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

In several subjects, the curriculum is not fully developed or implemented well. This means that pupils are not supported well enough to build up their subject knowledge. Pupils lose focus and motivation to learn because the curriculum is not structured or taught well enough. The needs of pupils with SEND are identified securely. However, the support in place for them is not always matched well to their needs or reviewed in a timely manner. This means that pupils with SEND are not building their knowledge and skills as well as they should.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

In some subjects, including mathematics, the curriculum sets out the key knowledge pupils must learn and the order in which to learn it. However, suitable checks are not made on how well pupils understand the curriculum. This means that some pupils move on to new learning with gaps in their knowledge still present. 14 and 15 January 2025

p.2

3

In the early years, children settle well into routines and know and follow the rules. They work well alongside their peers and are happy and confident. Staff know the children well and form positive relationships. However, the early years curriculum is not fully developed.

p.3

3

The school has prioritised addressing weaknesses in the management of pupils’ behaviour. Consequently, behaviour is improving and the environment is calm and orderly. Pupils play well together on the playground. However, some pupils are reluctant to actively participate in lessons. This is not always addressed effectively by staff. Systems to check attendance are effective. The school takes actions that strongly support pupils in attending regularly.

p.3

3

The school has worked hard to improve its personal development offer. Enrichment and wider curriculum opportunities have been enhanced. However, some parts of the personal development programme are less well implemented than others. Pupils know how to stay healthy. However, their knowledge of other faiths, cultures and diversity is less strong. There are plans to address this.

p.3

3

The school works with parents and carers to support pupils’ education. It offers many chances to come to school for workshops and coffee mornings. Staff are supportive of the school’s leadership. They are proud to be part of the school.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

n The curriculum in the early years and some foundation subjects does not clearly lay out the precise knowledge and essentials skills that pupils need to learn. As a result, learning is not well sequenced, and staff are not always clear about what they should teach and when. The school should design and implement a curriculum that ensures children in the early years, and pupils across the rest of the school, are well prepared for the next steps in education.  The school does not have a systematic approach to the use of assessment. This means that gaps in pupils’ learning and misconceptions are not routinely identified and addressed. The school should develop an effective approach to using assessment to inform teaching and support pupils’ progress. n The school does not check the impact of their work consistently and rigorously well enough. This means that the school is not evaluating their actions and areas for

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

improvement well enough. The school should develop a consistent and rigorous approach to identifying key priorities accurately and checking how well agreed actions are improving the school. 14 and 15 January 2025

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 14 and 15 January 2025

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Chair of governing body Nigel Savage-Bailey

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 4 May 2023, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of the Federation of St. Giles and St. John.  A new headteacher was appointed in January 2023.  The school does not use any alternative provision.  The school has mixed-aged classes in key stage 1 and key stage 2.  This is a Church of England school. The school received its most recent section 48 inspection in December 2019. The next inspection is expected to take place by December 2027.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 14 and 15 January 2025

p.5

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the members of the governing body, school leaders, staff, pupils, parents and a representative of the local authority and of the diocese.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, history and science. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors listened to pupils read to a familiar adult.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour and interactions at breaktimes and lunchtimes and in lessons. They spoke to many children during the inspection.

p.6

6

 Further inspection activities included discussions about SEND.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupil’s interests first.

p.6

Inspection team

Sam Cosgrove, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Azizan Kabil Ofsted Inspector 14 and 15 January 2025

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion