King Edward VI High School

Inspection of King Edward VI High School Westway, Stafford, Staffordshire ST17 9YJ

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Good

p.1

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.1

The headteacher of this school is Jason Christey. This school is part of Walton Multi- Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Neil Finlay, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Ben Rowell. 4 and 5 February 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Many pupils are happy at this school. This is because the school places significant emphasis on support and care. Pupils know that they have someone who they can talk to if they have concerns, and that these will be dealt with. Pupils also appreciate the additional pastoral staff who have recently started. However, some pupils are frustrated by the inconsistencies in the school. These include how well they learn, and the poor behaviour of some pupils, both in lessons and in social times.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

While the school has high expectations for how well pupils achieve, how these expectations are realised is inconsistent. This leads to variability in pupils’ achievement across the school. This is because pupils’ learning in some lessons or some subjects is less secure. Students in the sixth form have a more consistently positive experience.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy the opportunities that the school organises for them, including sports clubs, trips to battlefields and a musical production. The pupils who have positions of responsibility speak positively about their role in improving provision. Pupils appreciate what they learn in the ‘Life Matters’ lessons as this helps them be prepared for when they leave school. Some pupils, however, do not take advantage of the wider opportunities that the school organises for them.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Although examination results improved last year, the school recognises that there is still work to do to make further improvements. The school has reviewed the curriculum to ensure that the key knowledge to be taught is clearly identified. However, pupils’ understanding is not consistently checked, gaps in understanding are not routinely closed and some pupils do not complete the work. These inconsistencies contribute to some pupils with weaknesses in their understanding. The school has tried to address these gaps in Year 11, rather than ensuring that all pupils are secure in their learning as they progress through the school.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

In the sixth form, although examination results have been low, students have a firmer grasp of the key learning they need. This is because students’ understanding is checked more carefully, and gaps or misconceptions are more typically addressed. The tasks that students complete build on what they already know.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school ensures that staff have the information that they need to support the learning of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). However, this information is not used consistently well. This means that, in lessons, tasks are often not adapted suitably to meet the needs of these pupils. This contributes to some pupils with SEND not learning as well as they should. Therefore, provision for pupils with SEND is too variable.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school is in the early days of establishing a programme for pupils who need to develop their reading fluency. The school has identified these pupils but has made limited progress to support them to read fluently, and so access the curriculum. 4 and 5 February 2025

p.2

3

In many lessons, pupils listen and work hard, and the number of suspensions has fallen. However, the school’s approach to the management of behaviour is not consistently applied or understood. For example, the school does not monitor with precision the impact of its behaviour policy or how staff apply it. For example, until very recently the school was unclear on the number of pupils who were removed from lessons due to poor behaviour, or how often this happened. This lack of clear oversight and the inconsistent application of the policy mean that poor behaviour can sometimes disrupt learning, or pupils truant lessons. The school’s approach to attendance is more systematic and has resulted in improvements to attendance over time. This means that pupils attend the school well.

p.3

3

The school has planned a curriculum for pupils’ personal development called ‘Life Matters’. The school has monitored the delivery of this curriculum, but here too there remain inconsistencies in how it is taught and how pupils respond. The school organises a variety of clubs and trips to strengthen pupils’ talents and interests. Although there is some monitoring of which pupils take advantage of these opportunities, this is not systematic. Consequently, some pupils do not benefit from them. The provision for pupils’ future destinations is being developed, but the school does not use the information about pupils’ past destinations to inform their provision in school. Students in the sixth form have an appropriate range of wider opportunities and support to access destinations, including universities.

p.3

3

Leaders across the school are committed to supporting the pupils. However, too often the school does not evaluate the impact of its work strategically. This means that inconsistencies in behaviour and the quality of education have persisted. For example, the development of teaching practice is at an early stage. Staff are positive about the school’s engagement with them about their workload. The trust and governors and trustees are committed to the school and community. They offer challenge and have secured additional staffing for pastoral work. Currently, they do not receive enough precise information from the school to be able to support it to improve provision.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some teachers do not check pupils’ understanding of key knowledge carefully enough. This means that gaps in pupils’ learning are either not identified or not closed. As a result, some pupils do not progress through the curriculum as securely as they should. The school should ensure that teachers check pupils’ understanding effectively and systematically close gaps in knowledge. 4 and 5 February 2025

p.3

4

 The school’s agreed approach to managing behaviour is not consistently applied or understood. This means that there are inconsistent approaches to behaviour management, and poor behaviour can disrupt learning. The school must ensure that all staff implement agreed behaviour strategies effectively, and that there is a consistent approach to the management of behaviour in lessons and across the school.  The school’s evaluation of its work has not been sufficiently focused on measurement of impact. This means that the school is sometimes unclear on the effectiveness of its work, resulting in inconsistencies in pupils’ experiences. The school should ensure that leaders evaluate the impact of their work to plan for the next steps in the development of provision for all.  The school’s work to support pupils who struggle to read is in its early stages. Consequently, some pupils do not read as well as they should. This undermines their

p.4

4

ability to access the full curriculum. The school should ensure that it accurately identifies the precise gaps in pupils’ reading knowledge and provides focused support so that pupils read fluently and with confidence.  Sometimes, the school does not ensure that learning activities for pupils with SEND are consistently adapted to meet their needs. This means that some pupils with SEND do not make the progress that they should in their learning. The school should ensure that staff use the information provided to them for pupils with SEND, and adapt the learning activities accordingly to match the ambition of the school’s curriculum.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked-after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 4 and 5 February 2025

p.4

form

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of Walton Multi-Academy Trust. There are two schools in the trust.  King Edward VI High School converted to become an academy in September 2022. When its predecessor school, King Edward VI High School, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be good for overall effectiveness.  The school uses one unregistered alternative provision.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. 4 and 5 February 2025

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth-form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  As part of this inspection, the inspectors met with the chair of the local governing board, governors, the chair of the trust and trustees. They met with senior leaders, subject leaders, teaching staff, the CEO and other employees in the school. Inspectors also talked informally to pupils to gather general information about school life.

p.6

Information about this inspection

Governing body minutes were reviewed.  The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science, history and design technology. For each deep dive, the inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work in these subjects. Other subject lessons were visited as well as other samples of pupils’ and students’ work.  The inspectors reviewed the school’s extra-curricular activities, enrichment programme and their careers and personal development programmes with leaders and pupils.  The inspectors reviewed the school’s behaviour and attendance records with school leaders.  A range of documentation was scrutinised, including plans to improve the school.  The alternative provision used by the school was contacted by telephone.  The inspectors met with members of staff and spoke to pupils, both formally and

p.6

Information about this inspection

informally, at various points in the inspection. They took account of responses to Ofsted surveys for staff, Ofsted Parent View, and the free-text responses, as well as other communication from parents and carers.

p.6

Inspection team

Andrew Madden, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector 4 and 5 February 2025

p.6

7

Andrew Washbourne His Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

7

Liz Todd Ofsted Inspector 4 and 5 February 2025

p.7

8

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked-after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8