Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's home run by Aspris Care North West Limited

Inspected 6 Feb 2025 · URN 2596541

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Sandcastle Care Ltd

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Feb 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Deborah Turner

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    2596541

  • URN verified

    2596541

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2023.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+70Positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivepositivegood progresssettledhappysafeconsistentclear
Criticismweaknessesmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings711w+69
  • What needs to improve134w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
826
shorter than usual (typical 1319)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 59, typical 51
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 59%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection report for children’s home: 2596541 1 Registered provider: Sandcastle Care Ltd Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

This home is operated by a private provider. It provides care for up to two children who may experience social and emotional difficulties.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The home registered with Ofsted in October 2020 and the manager registered in February 2025.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

At the time of this inspection, one child was living at the home.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The children's home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: good

p.1

good

Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2596541 2

p.1

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

16/05/2023 Full Good 05/07/2022 Full Good 16/06/2021 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: 2596541 3

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The child is settled and happy in their home. The child’s social worker said, ‘The child has settled well and is making good progress. Staff are understanding of their needs, and their risks have reduced. Staff include the child’s family in the decisions for the child.’

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The child’s physical and emotional health needs are prioritised. Staff support the child to attend routine and specialist health appointments. This means that the child is in good health, and their positive well-being is promoted.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The child is in education and is supported to succeed and continue in their chosen and core subjects. However, there is no progression plan in place for the child’s education to progress from part time to full time.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff help the child to spend time with the people who are important to them. The child’s mother feels that staff keep them up to date about their child’s life. This means that the child is supported to maintain their identity and relationships with people who are important to them.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff help the child to personalise their home. The child has helped to decorate the home with their chosen displays of their own artwork. However, there are parts of the home that require maintenance. One bedroom is full of dismantled furniture, the door is blocked by a wardrobe that the child accesses, and most areas of the home need cleaning. There is broken furniture in the garden that needs removing.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Risk assessments are in place and reviewed regularly. De-escalation guidance and risk assessments provide a comprehensive level of support to staff. This means the child has been able to work through their experiences in a safe and appropriate way. This has led to a significant decrease in the child’s exposure to risk situations.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff use positive behaviour approaches, supported by therapeutic training. This avoids the use of negative or punitive measures to manage the child’s behaviour. The child clearly benefits from receiving consistent praise and rewards for positive behaviour through incentives.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The child’s episodes of going missing from home have significantly reduced. The child has a clear and comprehensive missing-from-home plan and profile to ensure that there is a consistent and robust approach from staff should the child go missing.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Recruitment procedures and practices are safe and effective. All staff are checked and vetted before starting to work at the home. These checks ensure that only suitable staff are employed to work at the home. Inspection report for children’s home: 2596541 4

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Professionals, staff and the child talk highly of the manager and the support they receive from him. A member of staff said, ‘I feel supported by the manager and my other team leaders. I think the team now are brilliant and staff are doing really well, everyone knows [name of child] and works together to support them.’

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

A stable staff team provides consistency and stability for the child. Staff benefit from regular supervision and team meetings and regularly reflect on their practice.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff have their practice appraised annually. However, appraisals do not fully consider feedback from professionals working alongside the member of staff or from the child living at the home. This is a missed opportunity for the manager and member of staff to further reflect on their practice.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders and managers have effective monitoring and review systems in place. This helps the manager to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the service and the care that staff provide to the child.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The manager welcomes independent scrutiny of the home, and an independent person visits monthly. The manager actions any recommendations made. This supports the development of the service.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The requirements raised at the last inspection have been met. Inspection report for children’s home: 2596541 5

p.4

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that there is a clear education plan for each child when not in full-time education, and children are supported to complete educational activities in line with this. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 28, paragraph 5.15)  The registered person should ensure that the home maintains a clean and well-kept environment which supports children’s physical, mental and emotional health. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 33 paragraph 7.3)  The registered person should ensure staff appraisals take into account, where reasonable and practical, the views of other professionals who have worked with the staff member over the year and children in the home’s care. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 61, paragraph 13.5)

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2596541 6

p.5

Children’s home details

Registered provider: Sandcastle Care Ltd

p.6

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: 2 Barton Close, Grove Park, Enderby, Leicester LE19 1SJ

p.6

Children’s home details

Responsible individual: Penelope Rafferty

p.6

Inspector

Deborah Turner, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2596541 7 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion