Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Brampton Primary School
Summary
Vic Wilkinson (lead), Phil Abbott, Tim Leah
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
15 Jan 2025
- Inspectors verified
Phil Abbott, Tim Leah, Vic Wilkinson
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
S40 1DD
- Name on report verified
Brampton Primary School
- URN verified
132225
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Although leaders have high ambitions for pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), inconsistencies in the quality of education means that pupils do not achieve as well as they should. p.2
- Staff do not have a consistent understanding of how cases of bullying should be managed. p.4
- This means that the school cannot accurately check if these pupils are achieving as well as they should. p.3
- The school should ensure that all pupils engage with learning activities that are designed to help them to apply what they have learned and to think more deeply about the content studied. p.4
- The school should ensure that it uses the information it has gathered about incidents of pupils’ behaviour, to check on the impact of the changes it has made and make further improvements where needed. p.4
- This means that some cases of bullying are not dealt with as thoroughly as they should be. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,274
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Brampton Primary School School Board Lane, Brampton, Chesterfield, Derbyshire S40 1DD
p.1
Inspection dates: 14 and 15 January 2025
p.1
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 14 and 15 January 2025
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are well cared for at Brampton Primary. They receive strong pastoral support. Relationships are positive. Staff know pupils well and listen to what they have to say. Pupils show positive attitudes to learning. Although leaders have high ambitions for pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), inconsistencies in the quality of education means that pupils do not achieve as well as they should.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Typically, pupils behave well. They know that they are expected to be respectful, resilient and responsible. They do their best to live up to these high expectations. Pupils support each other and celebrate the achievements of others. They are motivated by the rewards on offer including, earning points, gold awards, certificates and ‘always’ awards. However, the school does not review patterns of pupils’ behaviour well enough. This means that the school cannot be sure that behaviour is as positive as it could be.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils make an important contribution to the school. They are proud to take on a wide range of responsibilities, including school councillors, librarians and working with younger pupils as ‘mini readers’ and ‘mini mathematicians’. The schools’ ‘SMILERS’ team help everyone to know how to stay mentally healthy.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The new leadership team have made significant changes to the curriculum, arrangements for safeguarding and the quality of provision in the early years. However, they recognise that there is still much to do. The quality of education is not yet good. Oversight of curriculum subjects is at an early stage. The school, supported by the governing body, has identified the right priorities to bring about further necessary improvements. The school prioritises reading. The phonics programme is well organised. It is taught consistently. Pupils who begin to fall behind are quickly identified and supported to keep up. Beyond phonics, the school has considered how reading is taught. However, what pupils learn at each stage of the reading curriculum has not been identified clearly. Therefore, pupils do not build on their reading knowledge through school well enough.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
In most subjects the new curriculum is well designed. Content is sequenced in a logical order. It is clear what pupils are expected to learn and remember. However, the teaching of this curriculum is still at an early stage. In some lessons, the school does not ensure that pupils, including some pupils with SEND, complete tasks that are designed to help them think more deeply about what they have learned. Pupils are not secure in their knowledge. They do not remember key content over time.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Pupils with SEND, including those who attend the enhanced resource provision, are well cared for. The good level of pastoral support that they receive helps them to grow in confidence. However, for some, the school is not clear about the precise, small steps of improvement that these pupils are expected to make. As a result, the school cannot accurately check on how well these pupils are achieving. 14 and 15 January 2025
p.2
3
Attendance is positive. The school provides the right balance of challenge and support when absence is too high. Pupils typically behave well. Pupils who need help to live up to the schools’ expectations get the support they need. The school’s behaviour policy has been recently updated. The majority of pupils and staff feel it works well. However, the school does not identify patterns of behaviour or bullying well enough to be able to make further improvements. The school’s approach to anti-bullying is not consistently understood by staff and pupils. As a result, not all incidents of bullying are dealt with well.
p.3
3
Children get off to a strong start in the early years. The early years curriculum is meticulously organised. It is clear what children are expected to know and be able to do at each stage through Nursery and the Reception Year. Learning is fun and engaging. Children receive well-tailored support to improve their communication and language skills and to develop independence.
p.3
3
Provision for pupils’ personal development is a strength. Underpinned by a robust programme for personal social and health education (PSHE), pupils learn to be respectful and considerate of others. They have an age appropriate understanding of fundamental British values and of the protected characteristics.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Some parts of the curriculum are at an early stage of implementation. They have not yet resulted in pupils knowing and remembering content over time. As a result, pupils recall of the curriculum is inconsistent. The school should ensure that its’ curriculum is embedded and consistently results in pupils remembering content over time. Strategies to support pupils with SEND are not consistent. The school is not clear about the precise, small steps of improvement that some pupils with SEND are expected to make. This means that the school cannot accurately check if these pupils are achieving as well as they should. The school should ensure that there are consistent systems in place to ensure that it is clear what pupils with SEND should achieve. The school’s reading curriculum is not fully sequenced. This means that the school cannot be sure that content is being taught in the best or most logical order. The
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
school should ensure that its reading curriculum is designed to clearly outline what pupils are expected to know and achieve at each stage, so that pupils can securely build upon their prior learning. In some lessons, pupils, including those with SEND, do not complete learning activities that allow them to apply what they have learned or secure a deeper understanding of 14 and 15 January 2025
p.3
4
the content studied. Pupils who do not receive these opportunities do not learn and remember curriculum knowledge as well as their peers. The school should ensure that all pupils engage with learning activities that are designed to help them to apply what they have learned and to think more deeply about the content studied. The school does not review patterns of pupils’ behaviour well enough. This means that it does not know if any of the adaptations it has made are working or if further changes are required. The school should ensure that it uses the information it has gathered about incidents of pupils’ behaviour, to check on the impact of the changes it has made and make further improvements where needed. The schools’ anti-bullying policy is not implemented consistently well. Staff do not have a consistent understanding of how cases of bullying should be managed. This means that some cases of bullying are not dealt with as thoroughly as they should be. The
p.4
4
school should ensure that its policy for managing cases of bullying and/or alleged bullying is consistently understood and applied by all staff.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 14 and 15 January 2025
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 10 January 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The headteacher and assistant headteachers took up post in September 2023. The school has an enhanced resource provision for up to 14 pupils with autism. Places for this provision are allocated by the local authority. The school does not use any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. 14 and 15 January 2025
p.5
6
This was the first routine inspection that the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation. Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, the assistant headteachers, curriculum leaders, the special educational needs coordinator, the enhanced resource setting manager, the early years leader, the education welfare and attendance officer and groups of staff and pupils. Inspectors carried out deep dives in five subjects: reading, mathematics, science, history and religious education. To do this, they met with curriculum leaders, visited lessons, looked at pupils’ work and met with teachers and pupils. Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects. The lead inspector met with representatives of the governing body, including the chair. He also met with representatives of the local authority.
p.6
6
Inspectors took account of the responses to the Ofsted Parent View and written communication from a parent. They considered the responses to Ofsted’s staff survey. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors reviewed school documents, including those relating to governance, behaviour and attendance. Inspectors scrutinised leaders’ plans for improvement and their assessment of the school’s effectiveness. Inspectors spoke informally to pupils at breaktimes, in the dining hall and on the playground. They visited lessons in the enhanced resource provision.
p.6
Inspection team
Vic Wilkinson, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Tim Leah Ofsted Inspector 14 and 15 January 2025
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion