Schools & FE · Ungraded school inspection
Florendine Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
29 Jan 2025
- Inspectors verified
Jonathan Moore
- Postcode verified
B77 3DD
- Name on report verified
Florendine Primary School
- URN verified
124155
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school must enable pupils to become fluent readers and writers. p.3
- The school should ensure it has systems in place to ensure governors and leaders have an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. p.3
- The writing curriculum does not set clear expectations for teachers of how pupils’ writing should improve. p.2
- When writing, pupils often find it hard to use the grammar, spelling and punctuation they should or write texts with enough complexity. p.2
- The curriculum does not help many pupils learn to read and write as well as it should. p.1
- The school does not ensure that pupils gain a secure grasp of the fundamental reading and writing knowledge they need to access other subjects and succeed. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics6
“The school encourages pupils to enjoy reading.” p.2Progress & outcomes4
“The curriculum does not ensure that all pupils achieve well.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,391
- about usual (typical 1282)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 58, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 17%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a school judged good for overall effectiveness before September 2024: Florendine Primary School Florendine Street, Amington, Tamworth, Staffordshire B77 3DD
p.1
Inspection dates: 28 and 29 January 2025
p.1
Outcome
Evidence gathered during this ungraded (section 8) inspection suggests that aspects of the school’s work may not be as strong as at the time of the previous inspection. The school’s next inspection will be a graded inspection.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
‘It’s like a happy family,’ several parents said. This sums up the school’s cheerful, caring and safe nature. Pupils enjoy attending. Pupils talk with great interest about their lessons. They play well together outside in the interesting play areas. Pupils are keen to take on responsibilities. They like, for example, being play leaders to support younger children at playtimes. The school is welcoming and everyone feels included.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils mostly behave well, particularly when staff provide the right guidance. Pupils say there is little bullying or unkind behaviour. On the rare occasions this happens pupils say that staff are quick to sort things out. Pupils know the difference between right and wrong.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Despite the school’s ambitions for its pupils, some do not achieve well. One sign of this was the drop in the published outcomes at the end of Year 6 in 2024. The curriculum does not help many pupils learn to read and write as well as it should. Some pupils do not form a good understanding of some of the subjects they study. The school is addressing these issues. Improvements are at an early stage.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The curriculum does not ensure that all pupils achieve well. Some pupils at the earliest stage of reading are not taught to read fluently. The implementation of the reading curriculum is mixed. Some staff’s subject knowledge is not secure. In such cases, pupils form misconceptions. Sometimes, staff do not notice which pupils find things hard and so do not provide the support these pupils need. Provision to help those who find reading 28 and 29 January 2025
p.1
2
hard is not effective. It is not ambitious enough, and some do not catch up. The school encourages pupils to enjoy reading. Books are used to launch curriculum topics.
p.2
2
The writing curriculum does not ensure pupils write well. In the early stages, handwriting is not taught well. Many pupils struggle to write letters correctly. Some hold the pencil incorrectly but often staff do not correct this. As a result, these pupils form writing habits which make it hard for them to write well.
p.2
2
The writing curriculum does not set clear expectations for teachers of how pupils’ writing should improve. This means many pupils do not write with increasing skill. When writing, pupils often find it hard to use the grammar, spelling and punctuation they should or write texts with enough complexity.
p.2
2
In some other subjects, the curriculum is inconsistently implemented. It does not emphasise important knowledge. At times, tasks that teachers set do not support pupils’ learning. Sometimes, teachers do not check whether all pupils have understood, and then address misunderstandings. As a result, some pupils find it hard to recall the key information, or they form misconceptions.
p.2
2
Some parts of the curriculum are better. Mathematics is an example. The mathematics curriculum is now helping teachers ensure more pupils have the expected knowledge. Teachers clearly explain knowledge and procedures in lessons. They identify what pupils know and find difficult.
p.2
2
Reception children are happy and safe. Parents like the way staff have worked with them to help their children make a settled start. The same issues are seen with the curriculum in the early years as for the rest of the school.
p.2
2
Teachers adapt their lessons and provide support to help pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) learn the curriculum. The school works with external partners to ensure pupils with SEND receive appropriate support. A close check is kept on the progress of pupils with SEND. However, some of these pupils do not learn to read or write well.
p.2
2
Pupils attend well. The school makes this a priority. It identifies pupils whose attendance is a concern and takes sensitive actions to help such pupils attend more regularly.
p.2
2
Pupils’ knowledge of fundamental British values is patchy. Some recall the values and talk with understanding but many find this hard. Pupils are respectful of people from a range of cultural backgrounds. Pupils do not tolerate racism and know this is wrong. However, some pupils do not know much about the lives of people from different cultural backgrounds. This is because the curriculum is not consistently implemented.
p.2
2
The school is making quick and effective improvements, knowing academic standards have slipped recently. Leaders keep an eye on staff’s workload. Staff are very appreciative of the school’s supportive nature and are proud to work at the school. 28 and 29 January 2025
p.2
3
Governors are committed to the school. They keep a close watch on pupils’ well-being, safeguarding and the school’s finances. However, they do not have a clear oversight of the school’s academic standards or measure the effectiveness of the curriculum.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school does not ensure that pupils gain a secure grasp of the fundamental reading and writing knowledge they need to access other subjects and succeed. Some are not well prepared for their next stage of learning. The school must enable pupils to become fluent readers and writers. The curriculum is not implemented consistently. Some pupils’ understanding of the curriculum is patchy. Many pupils find it hard to recall the key information that is taught in a range of subjects. The school should support teachers to carefully check what pupils know in lessons in order to adapt their teaching accordingly so that pupils form a secure knowledge of the curriculum. Governors do not have sufficient oversight of the academic standards at the school. They have not successfully challenged leaders to maintain and raise academic standards since the last inspection. This impacts negatively on pupils’ academic
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
achievement. The school should ensure it has systems in place to ensure governors and leaders have an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses.
p.3
Background
Until September 2024, on a graded (section 5) inspection we gave schools an overall effectiveness grade, in addition to the key and provision judgements. Overall effectiveness grades given before September 2024 will continue to be visible on school inspection reports and on Ofsted’s website. From September 2024 graded inspections will not include an overall effectiveness grade. This school was, before September 2024, judged to be good for its overall effectiveness.
p.3
Background
We have now inspected the school to determine whether it has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at that previous inspection. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school’s work has improved significantly or that it may not be as strong as it was at the last inspection, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection. A graded inspection is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately. 28 and 29 January 2025
p.3
4
This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good for overall effectiveness in January 2016.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 28 and 29 January 2025
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 15 and 16 October 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
A new headteacher started at the school in September 2024. This school does not use alternative provision. This school runs its own before- and after-school provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspector visited a sample of lessons, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The inspector met with leaders, including those responsible for the curriculum, teaching and learning, behaviour, attendance, SEND, and personal development. 28 and 29 January 2025
p.5
6
To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interest first. The inspector spoke with the local authority school improvement officer. The inspector met with the chair and vice-chair of the governing body and one other governor. The inspector considered the survey responses to Ofsted Parent View and the free-text comments from parents. The inspector also evaluated the responses to the online Ofsted staff survey.
p.6
Inspection team
Jonathan Moore, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector 28 and 29 January 2025
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion