Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St Monica's RC High School, a Voluntary Academy
Summary
Kate Bowker (lead), Michael Wright, Paula Crawley, Paul Slater
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
22 Jan 2025
- Inspectors verified
Kate Bowker, Michael Wright, Paul Slater, Paula Crawley
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
M25 1JH
- Name on report verified
St Monica's RC High School, a Voluntary Academy
- URN verified
148050
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2023.
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school has high expectations for pupils’ behaviour that are consistently taught, reinforced, and embedded in school routines. p.2
- There are high expectations for what pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), can achieve. p.2
- Relationships between staff and pupils are warm and respectful. p.3
- Pupils are confident that staff will challenge any unpleasant behaviour successfully. p.3
- The school prepares pupils very well for life beyond school. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment9
“Teachers have strong subject knowledge.” p.2Leadership & governance4
“Leaders accurately identify the school’s strengths and what could be even better.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,088
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of St Monica's RC High School, a Voluntary Academy Bury Old Road, Prestwich, Manchester, Greater Manchester M25 1JH
p.1
Inspection dates: 21 and 22 January 2025
p.1
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement
p.1
The headteacher of this school is Emma Keenan. This school is part of St Teresa of Calcutta Catholic Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Chris Foley, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Marie Garside. 21 and 22 January 2025
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ experience of school has been transformed since the last inspection. Pupils and staff value highly the positive shift in culture that has been fostered across all areas of school life. This helps pupils to feel happy and safe. Pupils enjoy coming to school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school’s curriculum is highly ambitious for all pupils. There are high expectations for what pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), can achieve. Pupils work hard and show committed attitudes to their learning. They are keen to succeed. Pupils achieve well, including in national examinations.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has high expectations for pupils’ behaviour that are consistently taught, reinforced, and embedded in school routines. Everyone in the school appreciates this consistent approach to behaviour. Pupils understand what is expected of them. They behave well in lessons and at social times. This has helped to create a respectful and cohesive learning community.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils say that this is a school where everyone’s differences are accepted and everyone is equal. They celebrate diversity and learn about different faiths, cultures and perspectives. For example, pupils spoke with relish about ‘culture week’. Such activities contribute well to the respectful values upheld in the school.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Pupils study a broad and rich curriculum. In each subject, the school has designed the curriculum carefully, breaking learning down into manageable steps. These steps help pupils to build new knowledge based on what they already know. This supports pupils to remember important learning from previous years and to make links across topics.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Teachers have strong subject knowledge. They embrace opportunities to learn from each other and from colleagues across the trust. As a result, there is a consistent approach to teaching. Pupils benefit from lessons that are structured according to the school’s research-led methods. Teachers select tasks that help pupils revisit, practise and embed important ideas well.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Teachers use a range of strategies to check pupils' learning. They identify and address pupils’ misconceptions well. Mostly, this ensures that pupils consolidate their knowledge before moving on to new learning. Most pupils build their knowledge and skills securely over time.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school identifies the needs of pupils with SEND accurately and communicates these effectively to teachers. However, some teachers are less certain about how to make appropriate adaptations to activities which enable all pupils, including those who are disadvantaged or have lower rates of attendance, to learn the curriculum successfully.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has an effective system in place for pinpointing the reading ability of all pupils. It has implemented a structured reading programme which ensures that pupils who are 21 and 22 January 2025
p.2
3
not confident or fluent readers receive support swiftly. All teachers focus on developing pupils’ specialist vocabulary. Pupils value how ‘word of the week’ is helping them to use more sophisticated vocabulary across subjects.
p.3
3
The school has a unified approach to supporting positive behaviour. Its behaviour policy is widely understood and implemented well. Relationships between staff and pupils are warm and respectful. Pupils are confident that staff will challenge any unpleasant behaviour successfully. In recent times, the number of suspensions has reduced significantly.
p.3
3
Overall, the school has successfully ensured that pupils’ attendance remains high. As a result, most pupils attend school regularly and on time. However, this is not always the case for some disadvantaged pupils and for some pupils with SEND. This is having a negative effect on the achievement of some of these pupils.
p.3
3
The school prepares pupils very well for life beyond school. Over time, pupils develop an understanding of key topics such as the importance of healthy relationships. Pupils are encouraged to be active citizens in their school and local community. For example, they coordinate charitable events to support local homelessness organisations. The school has a comprehensive careers programme in place which supports pupils to make aspirational and well-informed decisions about their next steps in education or training.
p.3
3
Leaders accurately identify the school’s strengths and what could be even better. Trustees and governors provide valuable support and challenge. This has helped the school to go from strength to strength. Pupils, their parents and carers, and staff appreciate clear communication about what is happening and why. This ensures that the school’s actions have the support and trust of its community. Staff, including teachers new to the profession, believe that leaders are considerate of their workload and ready to listen to their views. Staff are proud to work at the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
At times, the implementation of the curriculum is not adapted well enough to meet the needs of some pupils, including those with SEND or those who are disadvantaged. This makes it more difficult for these pupils to learn the required curriculum content. The school should ensure that staff have the knowledge and skills to select the most effective strategies to support these pupils to learn well. Some groups of pupils, including some who are disadvantaged and some with SEND, do not attend school regularly enough. This further exacerbates the gaps in these 21 and 22 January 2025
p.3
4
pupils’ learning. The school should ensure that these pupils are supported to improve their rates of attendance and punctuality.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 21 and 22 January 2025
p.4
School details
Number of pupils on the school roll 1069
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 2 July 2024, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
This Catholic school is part of the Diocese of Salford. Its most recent section 48 inspection for schools of religious character took place in February 2024. The next section 48 is due to take place before the end of 2029. The school is part of St Teresa of Calcutta Catholic Academy Trust. The school uses one registered and two unregistered alternative providers. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form 21 and 22 January 2025
p.5
6
provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.
p.6
6
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors spoke with the headteacher, other senior leaders, subject leaders and other members of staff. They also spoke with members of the trust and members of the local governing body, including the chair. In addition, an inspector spoke with a representative of the diocese and a representative of the local authority. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, modern foreign languages, history, science and computing. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects, looked at samples of
p.6
6
pupils’ work and visited a sample of lessons. An inspector met with the leaders for SEND and reviewed samples of documentation related to pupils with SEND. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors reviewed a range of documents, including policies and analyses of pupils’ behaviour and attendance. Inspectors spoke to some pupils and staff about the school. They also observed pupils’ behaviour during lunchtimes and breaktimes. Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for staff and pupils. Inspectors also considered the views of parents expressed through Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text responses.
p.6
Inspection team
Kate Bowker, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Paula Crawley Ofsted Inspector 21 and 22 January 2025
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion