Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Ungraded school inspection

Phoenix Infant Academy

Inspected 12 Feb 2025 · published 7 Mar 2025 · URN 138731

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Carl McCarthy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Feb 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Carl McCarthy

  • Postcode verified

    SL1 3BQ

  • Name on report verified

    Phoenix Infant Academy

  • URN verified

    138731

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+77Very positivemore positive than 85% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentpositivelyeffectivehigh qualitystronghighly effectiveexceptionallyimproved
Criticismseriousfall behindconcernsnot strongharmerrors

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings884w+87
  • Safeguarding389w−22

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,273
about usual (typical 1282)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 51
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 3
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Safeguarding 23%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Inspection of a school judged good for overall effectiveness before September 2024: Phoenix Infant Academy Warrington Avenue, Slough, Berkshire SL1 3BQ

p.1

Inspection dates: 11 and 12 February 2025

p.1

Outcome

Evidence gathered during this ungraded (section 8) inspection suggests that the school's work may have improved significantly across all areas since the previous inspection. The school's next inspection will be a graded inspection.

p.1

Outcome

The headteacher of this school is Amanda Jarrett. This school is part of The Thames Learning Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Richard Kearsey, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Jon Reekie.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils know and model the school’s values of stay safe, try your best, be kind and be respectful exceptionally well. They share and celebrate each other’s successes positively. Pupils have an age-appropriate understanding of the fundamental British values of democracy, individual liberty, the rule of law, mutual respect and tolerance. Pupils enjoy roles and responsibilities such as school and ‘eco’ councillors. They are rightly proud of their school, and each other.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Behaviour is excellent. Pupils thrive due to staff’s clear expectations that are set out for them. Alongside this, staff and pupils demonstrate incredibly warm, supportive relationships that are reflected throughout the school. Beginning in Reception Year, staff have high expectations for pupils’ behaviour and apply the behaviour policy fairly and consistently. If any pupils find managing their own behaviour challenging, they receive timely, considerate and effective support.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils attend school regularly. Staff have the highest expectations for what pupils can achieve. Pupils reach these expectations. Staff are dedicated to all children and their families. The school’s determination and commitment to every pupil ensures that pupils, particularly disadvantaged pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), are very well prepared for their next stage of education. 11 and 12 February 2025

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pupils are happy and confident. They feel safe and understand how to stay safe, including when online. For example, pupils learn about the potential emotional effects of online harm appropriately and how to protect themselves and keep their personal information private. Pupils understand how to lead healthy lifestyles well. They learn comprehensively about nutritious food types, food hygiene and how to have healthy friendships.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school identifies the needs of pupils with SEND quickly and ensures that the curriculum is adapted to match their needs closely. Staff think carefully about how to ensure pupils with SEND access and experience opportunities equally throughout their learning. This includes the high quality personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum. Pupils, including those with SEND, respond to the school’s PSHE programme brilliantly.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

There are a wide range of opportunities to develop pupils’ talents and interests. Sports and extra-curricular activities such as gymnastics are popular and help pupils to be active and engaged in wider school life. Disadvantaged pupils consistently access and benefit from the school’s activities. Music, singing and collaborative performances are key features of the school’s provision. Reception Year and the ‘Nest’, the specialist resourced provision for pupils with SEND, are filled with songs, music, rhythm and rhymes. Pupils learn effectively about cultural, social and religious differences, and how to work together positively. This helps pupils build confidence and develop a strong sense of belonging.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The curriculum is highly ambitious for all pupils. Lessons help pupils to build their knowledge well. For example, in mathematics, pupils learn subject specific terminology such as 'regroup, part-part whole and partitioning' which are used, revisited and embedded in their understanding. Across the curriculum, pupils learn to write confidently. Pupils are rightly proud of their work, which is of high quality. Across the curriculum pupils learn to write confidently, with thoughtful description such as describing a mountain as ‘a spiky curve with rough, red rocks'. Staff have strong subject knowledge. They use questioning expertly and systematically to check pupils’ errors and misconceptions. This ensures that pupils build on their prior knowledge and learn the curriculum strongly.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Reading, books and stories are prioritised. The school’s approach to phonics and early reading is robust and highly effective. Children begin to learn phonics from the start of Reception Year. Staff model sounds and check pupils’ knowledge and understanding accurately. If any pupils fall behind, they receive timely interventions and catch up with their peers quickly. Traditional stories are at the heart of the curriculum from the beginning of Reception Year. Pupils quickly gain the knowledge and skills they need to become fluent readers.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school and wider community truly work in partnership together. Leaders are committed to taking decisions in the best interests of pupils. Trustees understand their roles and responsibilities fully. Staff are very positive about how the school engages with them and are supported to manage their workload successfully. The school offers 11 and 12 February 2025

p.2

3

excellent professional development opportunities, often helping other schools see what is possible in early primary education.

p.3

3

Parents and carers are overwhelmingly supportive. They are extremely grateful and appreciative of the staff team’s dedication to their children. Many parents expressed how well they have been supported in knowing how to contribute to their child’s education positively. One parent echoed the thoughts of many others, saying, ‘From the beginning of Reception my child has shown more confidence in everything they do.’

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Background

Until September 2024, on a graded (section 5) inspection we gave schools an overall effectiveness grade, in addition to the key and provision judgements. Overall effectiveness grades given before September 2024 will continue to be visible on school inspection reports and on Ofsted's website. From September 2024 graded inspections will not include an overall effectiveness grade. This school was, before September 2024, judged to be good for its overall effectiveness.

p.3

Background

We have now inspected the school to determine whether it has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at that previous inspection. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school's work has improved significantly or that it may not be as strong as it was at the last inspection, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection. A graded inspection is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good for overall effectiveness in March 2019.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 11 and 12 February 2025

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 11 and 12 February 2025

p.4

School details

Dates of previous inspection 19 and 20 March 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school does not use alternative provision.  Phoenix Infant Academy joined The Thames Learning Trust in September 2015

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in his evaluation of the school.  The inspector met with the headteacher, the chief executive officer, the chair of trustees and members of the governing body, and other senior staff.  The inspector visited a sample of lessons, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work 11 and 12 February 2025

p.5

6

 To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interest first.  The inspector spoke with several groups of pupils and observed their behaviour at break and lunchtime.  The inspector met with groups of staff and considered the opinions expressed through the staff survey.  The inspector took account of the views expressed from parents through Ofsted Parent View

p.6

Inspection team

Carl McCarthy, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector 11 and 12 February 2025

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion