Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Chawson First School

Inspected 27 Nov 2024 · published 4 Mar 2025 · URN 116672

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lorraine Lord (lead), Chris Ogden, Ed Masterson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 Nov 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Chris Ogden, Ed Masterson, Lorraine Lord

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    WR9 8BW

  • Name on report verified

    Chawson First School

  • URN verified

    116672

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+26Mostly positivemore positive than 20% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoypositiveeffectivelyrespectfuleffectivesuccessfulsafewell sequenced
Criticismnot consistentlynot alwaysnot effectivelylackinconsistentinconsistencydo not knowerrors

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1289w+24
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,256
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
18%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Chawson First School Wych Road, Droitwich, Worcestershire WR9 8BW

p.1

Inspection dates: 26 and 27 November 2024

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 26 and 27 November 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are happy and safe at Chawson First School. Each day they try hard to be ‘independent, aspirational and articulate’. The school does all it can to ensure that pupils attend regularly and on time. Most pupils do. There are clear expectations for pupils’ behaviour. Pupils know and meet these expectations. They are polite, courteous and respectful. Pupils are well behaved in lessons and at social times. Any pupil in need of help to manage their behaviour gets effective support.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school provides a range of opportunities for pupils to develop their talents and interests. These include taekwondo, dance, knitting and choir clubs. Pupils learn about road, water, railway and online safety. Pupils value opportunities to deepen their scientific, technological and mathematical knowledge at a local middle school. Visits and visitors to school help pupils to understand the curriculum better. Pupils enjoy taking on ‘ministerial’ responsibilities in school, such as becoming eco-ministers and behaviour ministers. This helps them to develop important leadership skills.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy learning mathematics and achieve well in this subject. However, expectations of pupils’ reading and writing are not high enough. As a result, many pupils do not learn to read or write as well as they should.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school’s curriculum is well sequenced with ambitious endpoints. Recent work to improve mathematics has had a positive impact. Teachers are provided with useful curriculum documentation to help identify what to teach and how in subjects such as history, geography and art. However, in some subjects, including reading and writing, the curriculum is not delivered well. This is because some staff do not know how to teach these subjects effectively. The important knowledge and skills that pupils need in order to write well have not been clearly identified by the school. Staff do not consistently check on how well pupils are learning the curriculum. Spelling, grammar and punctuation errors go unchecked. Expectations of pupils’ written work, including handwriting, are not high enough. All this has an impact on how well pupils achieve across the curriculum.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school’s expectations for pupils’ reading are not high enough. The teaching of reading, including phonics, is variable. This is because some staff do not have the knowledge and skills they need to teach reading well. At times, pupils who find learning to read difficult are not supported effectively to catch up quickly enough, particularly some disadvantaged pupils. The school’s checks on how well pupils learn to read lack oversight and rigour. This means some pupils fall further behind. Pupils do not learn to read with confidence and accuracy as well as they should.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pupils’ needs, including any special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), are clearly identified. However, some pupils struggle to access their work because it is too hard. Staff’s knowledge of how to adjust learning for pupils with SEND is inconsistent. This means that, at times, pupils with SEND do not always get the support they need to be successful in school. 26 and 27 November 2024

p.2

3

Staff work effectively with parents and carers of nursery children to establish what the children know and can do. Children in the nursery are well supported and get off to a strong start. They learn to take turns and share. Children enjoy counting and singing songs and rhymes. Adults skilfully help children to develop an awareness of sounds and learn new words. However, this work slows in the Reception Year because some staff do not have the expertise to teach early reading and writing well. In addition, there are delays in sourcing external support for those children who need it. These children do not get timely support to catch up in their language and communication skills. All this has an impact on the progress children make, particularly in reading and writing, as they move through the school.

p.3

3

Pupils develop an understanding of what it means to be respectful when learning about different faiths, including Christianity, Islam and Judaism. They learn about a range of cultures and festivals, such as Diwali and Christmas, and their importance to different faiths. Pupils learn about healthy and safe relationships. They know the qualities of a good friend. Pupils know how to keep safe when working online. The school’s elections create great excitement. Newly elected ministers take on their roles with pride. Pupils are well prepared for life in modern Britain.

p.3

3

Turbulence in staffing, including leadership, has hampered the school’s progress in recent years. School leaders, including governors, have not been well supported to set the right priorities for the school. As a result, reading and writing have not been sufficiently prioritised. The school’s additional funding has not been used effectively to provide timely high-quality teaching for those pupils who need it.

p.3

3

Most staff are positive about the support from leaders to manage their workload and well- being. The majority of parents are positive about the school.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The teaching of writing, including transcription, grammar, punctuation and spelling, is not consistently effective. This means that some pupils do not write legibly and accurately. The school should ensure that staff know how to teach writing well so that they can support pupils to write with fluency and accuracy and to improve their written work.  There is inconsistency in the delivery of the school’s approach to early reading and phonics. This means that some pupils, particularly pupils with SEND or those who are disadvantaged, do not learn the early reading and phonics skills needed for future success well enough. The school should ensure that staff have the knowledge and skills 26 and 27 November 2024

p.3

4

they need to teach early reading effectively so that pupils learn to read as well as they should.  Some pupils with SEND do not get the support they need quickly enough. This is because staff are not always clear how to adapt the curriculum to meet the needs of these pupils. In addition, some specialist support is not sourced quickly enough to help children to catch up in the early years. The school should ensure that pupils with SEND receive the timely support they need to be successful in school.  Governors do not have the expertise to hold leaders to account for the performance of the school. They have been too accepting of the information they receive and have not ensured that the right priorities have been set for the school. As a result, too many pupils do not learn to read or write with fluency and accuracy, including some pupils with SEND and disadvantaged pupils. The school should ensure that governors can

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 26 and 27 November 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 12 February 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The headteacher is new to role since the last inspection. She was the previous deputy headteacher at the school and took on the headship role in 2019.  The chair of governors is also new to role since the last inspection.  The school uses one unregistered alternative provider.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. 26 and 27 November 2024

p.5

6

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspectors held meetings with the headteacher and other leaders. The lead inspector met with members of the school’s governing body. She also held a telephone conversation with a representative from the local authority and the unregistered alternative provider. The inspectors also talked to pupils, staff and parents to gather information about school life.  The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, history, mathematics and science. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  The inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects.

p.6

6

 To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspectors observed informal times of the day as part of their evaluation of safeguarding and pupils’ behaviour.  The inspectors considered responses to Ofsted Parent View and the free-text comments. The inspectors also considered the responses to Ofsted’s staff survey.

p.6

Inspection team

Lorraine Lord, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Ed Masterson Ofsted Inspector 26 and 27 November 2024

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion