Schools & FE · School monitoring visit
St Paul's Church of England Primary School Brinnington
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Steve Bentham
- Postcode verified
SK5 8AA
- Name on report verified
a school not in a category of concern of St Paul’s Church of England Primary School Brinnington
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- refine the curriculum and the arrangements to assess pupils’ understanding in some subjects so that there is a greater focus on the key knowledge that pupils need for future learning p.1
- strengthen work with the parents and carers of some younger pupils at the school to help reduce the rates of persistent absence. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 810
- shorter than usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 17%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Joanne Harrington Headteacher St Paul’s Church of England Primary School Brinnington Brinnington Rise Stockport Cheshire SK5 8AA
p.1
Church of England Primary School Brinnington
This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 28 January 2025, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school meets the monitoring threshold as set out in the Monitoring Inspection Handbook .
p.1
Church of England Primary School Brinnington
The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s key and (where applicable) provision judgements, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.
p.1
Church of England Primary School Brinnington
During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, governors, the local authority and the diocese the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also visited lessons, looked at examples of pupils’ work, met with pupils and staff and reviewed a range of documents. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.
p.1
Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but some aspects of the
The school should take further action to: refine the curriculum and the arrangements to assess pupils’ understanding in some subjects so that there is a greater focus on the key knowledge that pupils need for future learning strengthen work with the parents and carers of some younger pupils at the school to help reduce the rates of persistent absence.
p.1
Main findings
The school has responded well to the areas for improvement left at the previous inspection. It has put in place a clear curriculum so that all staff know and understand what is being taught in each subject. For example, the curriculum in geography builds on pupils’ prior knowledge well. It is clear about how the small steps in learning build towards a greater understanding of the subject. As a result, pupils are demonstrating a better recall of their prior learning.
p.2
Main findings
The school has taken effective action to put in place a wealth of opportunities to help pupils to remember key aspects of their learning. Teachers use this information to reshape the way in which they teach pupils’ next steps in learning. However, the arrangements to refine and assess the curriculum are not as well developed in some subjects. Although subject leaders have clear actions in place to address this issue, the curriculum in these subjects is not currently clear enough about the essential knowledge that pupils need for their future learning. Although pupils do remember more of the curriculum, this is not consistently the most important content.
p.2
Main findings
The school has taken comprehensive steps to ensure that there is a consistent approach to developing pupils’ reading knowledge throughout the school. In key stage 1, pupils who have fallen behind the intended curriculum are supported well to gain a strong grasp of phonics so that they start to read with greater fluency and expression as they progress from one year to the next. In key stage 2, teachers have been supported well to enhance the way in which they develop pupils’ understanding of vocabulary and their comprehension skills. This is effective in ensuring that pupils’ reading knowledge helps them to enjoy and understand a wide range of texts.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have brought about many positive changes to the quality of pupils’ education to address effectively the areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection. As a result, teachers and pupils demonstrate a better understanding of the curriculum. Staff are positive about the direction that the school is taking. The teachers who shared their views remarked that they felt well supported by leaders.
p.2
Main findings
Governors understand the school and its context well. They are provided with a range of information to keep them well informed about the actions being taken to improve the school.
p.2
Main findings
The school is taking reasonable steps to tackle pupils’ absence and punctuality. The school focuses on promoting attendance well. However, it finds it difficult to engage with some parents of younger pupils. Due to the persistent absence of some of these younger pupils, there has been little improvement in the school’s overall attendance rates since the previous inspection.
p.2
Main findings
The school has embraced the support from the local authority and diocese. This has been essential in empowering leaders in the school to bring about improvements to the curriculum. Staff value professional development opportunities from both the local authority and when working alongside other schools.
p.3
Main findings
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of governors, the director of education for the Diocese of Chester, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Stockport. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion