Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Academy@Worden

Inspected 22 Jan 2025 · published 3 Mar 2025 · URN 139290

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Neil Johnson (lead), Dympna Woods, Tim Long

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Jan 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Dympna Woods, Neil Johnson, Tim Long

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    PR25 1RN

  • Name on report verified

    Academy@Worden

  • URN verified

    139290

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+85Very positivemore positive than 92% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh expectationsambitiouseffectivelyhighly effectiveproudpositivefeel safehappy
Criticismconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1031w+85
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,015
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 37%

Full report text

Inspection of Academy@Worden Redwood Avenue, Leyland, Lancashire PR25 1RN

p.1

Inspection dates: 21 and 22 January 2025

p.1

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Good

p.1

The headteacher of this school is Alan Hammersley. This school is part of Academy@Worden, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Alan Hammersley, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Maureen Woodall. 21 and 22 January 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are proud to attend Academy@Worden. They appreciate the range of wider, cultural opportunities that are on offer to them. Pupils treat each other with kindness. They show respect for diversity.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils told inspectors that the school will listen to their concerns. This helps to ensure that pupils feel safe and happy in school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are polite and respectful. They make visitors to their school feel welcome. In lessons and during social times, there is a calm and orderly atmosphere. Pupils understand the school’s high expectations of their learning. They work hard to meet them. The school acknowledges pupils’ efforts with a range of rewards. This supports them to behave and achieve well.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are encouraged to participate in a range of experiences outside of the classroom. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are fully included in the life of the school. During the inspection, inspectors saw the commitment that pupils had in preparing to showcase their talents in the school show, ‘Shrek’. Pupils regularly contribute to the school community, for example, as volunteer peer readers and through the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award Scheme. This enriches their learning.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has designed a broad and ambitious curriculum. It has thought carefully about the knowledge that pupils should learn. The curriculum is ordered sensibly to ensure that pupils have the prior knowledge to learn successfully.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Teachers deliver the curriculum clearly using their secure subject knowledge. Typically, teachers use activities that ensure pupils know and remember more. Teachers check what pupils have learned effectively through a range of strategies. Consequently, they have an accurate view of what pupils know and can do before moving on to new learning.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The published outcomes for 2024 show an improvement in pupils’ achievement by the end of Year 11. The school has continued to make positive changes to the curriculum. One of these changes is the priority it has given to reading. The school has developed comprehensive support for pupils at all stages of reading, including those pupils at the earliest stages of learning to read. The library is at the centre of the school and is encouraging pupils to develop a love of reading. Pupils read well because of these changes. Developments to the curriculum have also resulted in an increase in the proportion of pupils studying the English Baccalaureate suite of qualifications.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school supports pupils with SEND effectively through a range of strategies inside and outside of the classroom. However, the school does not systematically identify the needs of a small number of pupils until too late in their school journey. Consequently, some pupils do not receive the support that they need quickly enough. 21 and 22 January 2025

p.2

3

Pupils respond well to the high expectations that the school has for their behaviour. This means that learning is uninterrupted. However, the school does not routinely use the information that it gathers about behaviour or some other aspects of its provision effectively enough. Therefore, sometimes, support is not targeted at identified groups of pupils to make the biggest difference. The school has created highly effective systems to ensure that pupils’ attendance is consistently high. These actions have had a positive impact on the attendance of disadvantaged pupils to ensure that they access education regularly.

p.3

3

Pupils benefit from a thoughtfully designed personal, social, health and economic education curriculum. They learn about healthy relationships in an age-appropriate way. They know how to keep themselves safe. Pupils are prepared well for the next stage of their education, employment or training. The school offers a range of extra-curricular activities. However, at times, leaders do not ensure that they support disadvantaged pupils to take full advantage of this rich offer.

p.3

3

Trustees share the school’s ambitious vision for its pupils. They offer support and challenge to the school to achieve its development aims. Staff appreciate the range of professional development opportunities that the school offers. Staff value the school’s consideration of their workload and well-being. They are immensely proud to work at the school.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The additional needs of a small number of pupils with SEND are not routinely identified early enough. Consequently, these pupils do not receive the support that they need in a timely enough manner. The school should ensure that staff are suitably equipped to identify and meet the needs of these pupils.  The school does not systematically use the information that it gathers to improve some aspects of its provision. As a result of this, the school’s actions sometimes do not target the areas that will have the most impact. The school should strengthen its use of the information that it collects to match its actions strategically to the areas where it will make the most difference.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 21 and 22 January 2025

p.3

4

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 21 and 22 January 2025

p.4

School details

Dates of previous inspection 8 and 9 January 2020, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The headteacher was appointed to his role since the last inspection.  The school uses three registered alternative provisions for a small number of pupils.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 21 and 22 January 2025

p.5

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the headteacher, senior leaders and other members of staff.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, computing, history and modern foreign languages. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors scrutinised a range of documents, including governor meeting minutes, the school’s self-evaluation, development plan and records relating to pupils’ behaviour and attendance.

p.6

6

 Inspectors spoke to representatives of the local authority and the trustees, including the chair of trustees.  Inspectors spoke to pupils about their experiences of school and their views on behaviour and bullying. They also observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons and at breaktimes.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors considered the responses shared through Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments. They also considered the responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for staff and pupils.

p.6

Inspection team

Neil Johnson, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Dympna Woods Ofsted Inspector 21 and 22 January 2025

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion