Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Good Shepherd RC School

Inspected 29 Jan 2025 · published 3 Mar 2025 · URN 100722

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Rebecca Iles-Smith (lead), Kieran Bird, Neil Harvey, Rupinder Bansil

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Jan 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Kieran Bird, Neil Harvey, Rebecca Iles-Smith, Rupinder Bansil

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    BR1 5EP

  • Name on report verified

    Good Shepherd RC School

  • URN verified

    100722

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−32Criticalmore positive than 6% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisesuccessfullyeffectivelyhigh expectationsambitioushappysafekindcaring
Criticismweaknessesgapsnot alwaysstrugglenot clearlacklackstoo often

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1164w−35
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,132
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of Good Shepherd RC School Moorside Road, Downham, Bromley, Kent BR1 5EP

p.1

Inspection dates: 28 and 29 January 2025

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 28 and 29 January 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are happy and safe at this school. Staff are kind and caring towards them. Pupils are typically courteous and kind. The school makes it a priority to teach pupils its values, for example during regular assemblies and by collecting donations for a food bank. This helps pupils to understand how they can contribute to their community.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Although pupils largely behave well, behaviour can be unsettled and unfocused in lessons. Pupils typically treat one another with respect. When bullying does occur, the school takes action to deal with it. Staff speak with pupils about their behaviour and encourage them to reflect on how they could do better.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has introduced new curriculum resources in many subjects. New content is ambitious. However, staff do not understand it well. The school has not adapted new content to take into account pupils’ prior knowledge. Teaching and support do not focus well on building pupils’ knowledge over time. Pupils’ achievement is mixed. In some aspects of mathematics, pupils achieve well below national averages.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school provides a good range of experiences for pupils, including visits to museums and places of worship. Pupils regularly make use of a range of sports clubs. Pupils take up responsibility through roles such as faith leaders.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school’s curriculum sets out the content pupils should learn. Most of this is new. In some subjects, such as mathematics, staff have been supported to understand the curriculum. This helps them focus on key knowledge when teaching. However, in other subjects, staff lack strong subject knowledge. They do not break down long-term curriculum goals into smaller components. As a result, pupils complete tasks that do not help them learn important content. Pupils find it hard to remember what they have been taught in these subjects.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Staff are aware of the early learning goals for children by the end of Reception. The school has identified what children should know, for example about numbers and reading. However, in other areas, the school has not identified what children should learn. Without a clear plan for how children will reach long-term aims, too much is left to chance.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Recently, the school has checked pupils’ knowledge of the mathematics and phonics curriculum. This helps staff know where pupils need extra support. Teaching is now addressing some of the weaknesses in pupils’ understanding in these areas. However, the school has not checked how well pupils remember what they have learned in other subjects. They have not reviewed the curriculum to make sure pupils have secured important knowledge. As a result, pupils struggle to learn and remember new content successfully over time.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school identifies the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) effectively. Staff provide support and resources to help pupils access the 28 and 29 January 2025

p.2

3

curriculum. However, when teaching does not focus precisely on what all pupils need to know, the support for pupils with SEND also lacks focus.

p.3

3

Teachers regularly discuss books with pupils, which encourages their interest in reading. Phonics teaching helps pupils use sounds to read unfamiliar words. However, some pupils, including those in the early years, have large gaps in their phonics knowledge. The school knows that some teaching has not been effective enough. Teaching now addresses gaps in pupils’ knowledge, and this is helping some pupils. However, some phonics teaching still does not build well on what pupils already know.

p.3

3

In lessons, pupils mostly follow routines. However, too many pupils do not join in with classroom activities. Staff do not use consistent methods to address this behaviour. Pupils are not clear about what is expected from them in tasks This means they do not finish important activities designed to help them embed important knowledge.

p.3

3

Most pupils attend school regularly. However, a significant number of disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND are absent too often. The school monitors attendance and provides support to help improve it. However, the school has not evaluated how well its approaches work.

p.3

3

The school provides a good personal, social, health and economic education. Pupils learn about different characteristics and beliefs. They visit places of worship to understand different faiths. This helps them to understand fundamental British values. Pupils are taught about healthy relationships and develop a good understanding of how to stay safe, including from online and offline risks.

p.3

3

Leaders, including governors, have developed ways to evaluate the school’s work. However, these methods do not always give a clear understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. They do not always have the information needed to monitor all areas of the school, including behaviour and the curriculum.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Staff do not present information routinely clearly or give appropriate work to pupils to achieve the main aims of the curriculum effectively. As a result, pupils struggle to recall key knowledge. The school must ensure that teaching enables pupils to learn and remember knowledge successfully across the whole curriculum.  The school does not use assessment effectively to check pupils’ understanding and inform teaching, particularly in foundation subjects. As a result, pupils develop gaps in important knowledge. The school must use checks on pupils’ learning to identify 28 and 29 January 2025

p.3

4

misconceptions and address them.  In some areas of the early years curriculum, the school has not identified the precise knowledge it wants children to learn in order to be ready for their next stage of education. As a result, some children develop gaps in crucial early knowledge which persist. The school must ensure children learn essential knowledge securely to prepare them well for Year 1.  Expectations for learning behaviour are not routinely consistent. As a result, some pupils lose focus during learning activities and do not complete important work. Staff must promote consistently high expectations to ensure positive learning behaviour for all.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 28 and 29 January 2025

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Website www.goodshepherd.lewisham.sch.uk

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 26 and 27 February 2020, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this school

 This is a Roman Catholic school in the Archdiocese of Southwark . The school’s most recent section 48 inspection, for schools of a religious character, was carried out in November 2023. The next section 48 inspection should take place by November 2028.  The school makes use of one registered alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic 28 and 29 January 2025

p.5

6

began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher and other senior leaders. Inspectors also met with leaders with responsibility for SEND, behaviour and attendance, pupils’ personal development and the early years.  Inspectors met with representatives from the local governing body, the diocese and the local authority.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, art and geography. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also looked at curriculum information in some other subjects.  Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for staff and pupils.

p.6

6

 The inspectors took account of responses to the Ofsted Parent View survey and the free-text responses.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.

p.6

Inspection team

Rebecca Iles-Smith, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Kieran Bird His Majesty’s Inspector 28 and 29 January 2025

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion