Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Maassen, Iris Josephine Marguerite
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
14 Feb 2025
- URN verified
EY406925
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 293
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage', which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 17 January 2025, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to: Safety and suitability of premises environment and equipment.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 4 February 2025, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found that the childminder was caring for children in the basement of her property with no emergency evacuation route. The childminder took immediate action during the regulatory visit and made alternative arrangements to care for the children on the first floor.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We found that the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have issued actions for the provider to take. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
• provide Ofsted with the necessary information to enable checks to be completed to establish the suitability of anyone aged 16 years and over living or working on the premises
p.1
Summary of outcome
• maintain a daily record of the names of the children being cared for on the premises, their hours of attendance, and the names of each child's key person.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We will monitor the provider's response to ensure the actions are successfully completed. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion