Schools & FE · Ungraded school inspection
St John's Church of England Primary School, Tisbury
Summary
Julie Carrington (lead), Peter Overton
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
21 Jan 2025
- Inspectors verified
Julie Carrington, Peter Overton
- Postcode verified
SP3 6HJ
- Name on report verified
St John’s Church of England Primary School, Tisbury
- URN verified
126388
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- As a result, these pupils access the curriculum successfully, and most achieve very well. p.2
- The school should ensure that the ambitious curriculum that is planned is being implemented consistently well so that pupils gain the depth of knowledge they need to excel across the curriculum. p.3
- In key stage 2, many pupils behave impeccably in lessons because of the high expectations of staff. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics5
“Staff follow a clearly structured phonics programme.” p.2Personal development4
“There are some extra-curricular clubs, such as tag rugby.” p.1Parents & families3
“A minority of parents and carers would like more clubs.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,293
- about usual (typical 1282)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a school judged good for overall effectiveness before September 2024: St John’s Church of England Primary School, Tisbury Weaveland Road, Tisbury, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP3 6HJ
p.1
Outcome
St John’s Church of England Primary School, Tisbury has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at the previous inspection.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff and pupils build positive relationships. Everyone is treated as an individual. Adults are routinely on hand to help and support. In early years, children learn routines and settle quickly. In key stage 2, many pupils behave impeccably in lessons because of the high expectations of staff. Across the school, pupils experience a broad curriculum and achieve well.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils usually get along with one another. They have confidence in their teachers to help them sort out any disagreements. Pupils enjoy the vast school grounds at social times; many are quick to get on their wellies and explore. Team and ball games are also a favourite for many.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school provides opportunities beyond the academic. For example, residential visits are on offer to all pupils in key stage 2. Pupils raise money for charity. They learn about road safety. Working with artists and visiting a local gallery promote a love of the arts.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school teaches pupils about leadership and teamwork. For example, ‘parliament representatives’ and sports ambassadors make a positive contribution to school life. There are some extra-curricular clubs, such as tag rugby. A minority of parents and carers would like more clubs. There are many opportunities to take part in sporting events.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Leaders, including governors, have an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and aspects that require refinement. Committed staff work hard to develop pupils’ 21 January 2025
p.1
2
character and confidence. The school has a consistent approach to teaching pupils to manage their emotions and self-regulate. This ensures that they become responsible for their actions and gain resilience and maturity over time. Pupils are well prepared for secondary school.
p.2
2
The school’s curriculum is suitably ambitious. It now sets out the essential knowledge pupils should know and the order in which they should learn it. In many subjects, pupils recall prior learning well and connect this to new content. For example, in mathematics, pupils in Years 5 and 6 use their quick recall of multiplication tables to identify common factors, common multiples and prime numbers. The school’s focus on learning subject- specific vocabulary is very successful in some subjects. This builds pupils’ knowledge progressively and deepens their understanding over time, for example when learning about invasion in history.
p.2
2
The school is now identifying the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) accurately. However, a minority of parents recognise that, at times, it has taken time for this to happen. Typically, staff ensure that they adapt their teaching approaches to take account of pupils’ SEND. As a result, these pupils access the curriculum successfully, and most achieve very well.
p.2
2
In the early years, children learn how to make friends and the importance of becoming independent right from the start. Children sustain their concentration when learning in a group and when completing what the school calls ‘challenges’ independently. Staff model speaking in sentences, and this supports children’s early language development effectively.
p.2
2
Staff follow a clearly structured phonics programme. In Reception, children are eager to learn new sounds and use these to read and write simple words for the first time. Most pupils in Reception and Year 1 are keeping up with the phonics programme. Pupils who need it receive additional targeted teaching. This is helping these pupils to increase their reading fluency.
p.2
2
In the recent past, a minority of pupils entered Years 3, 4 and 5 with gaps in their spelling knowledge. The school’s current work to ensure that all pupils can use and apply their phonics and spelling rules accurately is paying off. As a result, current pupils are becoming increasingly confident and capable writers.
p.2
2
The school sets clear expectations for staff on how and when to check what pupils know and remember. This ensures that pupils make progress through the curriculum term by term and year on year. However, there are occasions when teaching does not build firmly on what pupils know already or staff do not deal with misconceptions when they arise. At times, in key stage 1, staff do not prioritise teaching the most complex knowledge in the intended curriculum. This prevents these pupils from excelling. 21 January 2025
p.2
3
The school has a well-structured personal development programme. It teaches pupils about online safety, maintaining effective relationships and not to discriminate. Typically, pupils attend well and enjoy school. The school has recently increased the robustness of its checks on pupils’ absence. For example, when pupils have dips in their attendance, the school takes appropriate action.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In key stage 1, there are occasions when staff do not prioritise the teaching of the more complex knowledge in the intended curriculum. A minority of pupils do not get enough practice to secure and deepen their understanding across some sequences of work. The school should ensure that the ambitious curriculum that is planned is being implemented consistently well so that pupils gain the depth of knowledge they need to excel across the curriculum. At times, teaching does not address pupils’ misconceptions when they arise. This means that a minority of pupils do not achieve consistently well. The school should ensure that staff are alert to and adept at addressing pupils’ misconceptions so that they achieve consistently well across the curriculum.
p.3
Background
Until September 2024, on a graded (section 5) inspection we gave schools an overall effectiveness grade, in addition to the key and provision judgements. Overall effectiveness grades given before September 2024 will continue to be visible on school inspection reports and on Ofsted’s website. From September 2024, graded inspections will not include an overall effectiveness grade. This school was, before September 2024, judged to be good for its overall effectiveness.
p.3
Background
We have now inspected the school to determine whether it has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at that previous inspection. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school’s work has improved significantly or that it may not be as strong as it was at the last inspection, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection. A graded inspection is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately. 21 January 2025
p.3
4
This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good for overall effectiveness in June 2019.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 21 January 2025
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 4 and 5 June 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
St John’s Church of England Primary School is a voluntary-controlled school in the Diocese of Salisbury. As such, it is subject to an inspection of denominational education under section 48 of the Education Act 2005. The most recent section 48 inspection took place in May 2024. The school does not currently use any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the headteacher, other staff and five members of the local governing body. An inspector also held telephone conversations with representatives of the local authority and the diocese. 21 January 2025
p.5
6
Inspectors visited a sample of lessons, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. They also met with pupils to talk about their experience of school life and observed breaktimes and lunchtimes. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. An inspector considered the views of parents submitted via Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments. She also reviewed the responses to Ofsted’s survey for school staff.
p.6
Inspection team
Julie Carrington, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Peter Overton Ofsted Inspector 21 January 2025
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion