Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
The Westgate School
Summary
James Stuart (lead), Lucy English (lead), Andrew Morrison, Chris Ellison, Ian Cooksey, John Burridge, Julia Mortimore, Matthew Haynes, Russell Bennett
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
16 Jan 2025
- Inspectors AI-checked
Andrew Morrison, Chris Ellison, Ian Cooksey, James Stuart, John Burridge, Julia Mortimore, Lucy English, Matthew Haynes, Russell Bennett
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
SL1 5AH
- Name on report verified
The Westgate School
- URN verified
138012
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The strong relationships between staff and pupils help to make this a happy school. p.2
- The clear routines support the high expectations. p.2
- Until November 2020, the school was exempt from routine inspection because it was judged as outstanding for overall effectiveness at its previous inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. p.1
- Although some of them think that the rules for behaviour can be too strict at times, they do recognise that the high expectations have made things better for everyone, especially in lessons. p.2
- Recent changes to establish high expectations for behaviour across the school are not fully embedded, particularly during unstructured social times. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In some instances, tasks do not match what pupils need to learn next. p.2
- The school needs to ensure that actions are taken as intended so there is mutual respect throughout the school. p.3
- The school should strengthen the approaches they have set out to ensure that tasks build on pupils’ learning consistently well. 14 to 16 January 2025 p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment3
“The headteacher of this school is Jon Gargan.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,177
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 57, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of The Westgate School Cippenham Lane, Slough, Berkshire SL1 5AH
p.1
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
The headteacher of this school is Jon Gargan. This is the only school in The Westgate School single-academy trust. The trust is overseen by a board of trustees, co-chaired by Inderjit Dhillon and Zarrin Hamid.
p.1
Until November 2020, the school was exempt from routine inspection because it was judged as outstanding for overall effectiveness at its previous inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. The school has not been inspected under section 5 of the Act since March 2014. The school received a monitoring inspection under section 8 of the Act in November 2018. Since September 2024, schools have not been awarded an overall effectiveness grade. 14 to 16 January 2025
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The strong relationships between staff and pupils help to make this a happy school. There is clear ambition for all to achieve their best and, as the school puts it, to be ‘equipped for life’. Academic achievement has strengthened, something pupils recognise and appreciate. Results in published outcomes continue to rise, particularly for pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Pupils now achieve in line with national averages at GCSE and A Level.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Alongside this focus on a broad range of qualifications that help to prepare pupils for their next steps, is a determination for pupils to become young adults who have confidence and resilience for success in their futures. Pupils have an increasing set of opportunities that link thoughtfully into their interests and help them to develop new ones.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils appreciate the recent changes to the school. Although some of them think that the rules for behaviour can be too strict at times, they do recognise that the high expectations have made things better for everyone, especially in lessons. They appreciate the way that staff act to support them if anyone is unkind or falls short of these expectations.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school is determined that all pupils are included in the full life of the school and benefit from all it offers. At the heart of this is the expert knowledge that staff have of pupils, including of any additional needs. Generally, this knowledge is used well by staff who shape learning activities carefully to meet the needs of pupils. This is particularly strong in the sixth form. However, this is not consistent across the school. In some instances, tasks do not match what pupils need to learn next. When this happens, pupils do not learn as well as they could.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Over the past year, a comprehensive staff training programme has made a real difference to staff expertise. Overall, staff have strong subject knowledge which they use well, particularly when adapting work to support pupils with SEND. In discussions, pupils are keen to show their new knowledge. In many subjects, they apply this with confidence to solve problems. Here, they are supported well to remember and recall knowledge. Sixth- form students demonstrate impressive independent working skills.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Reading is prioritised by the school. Activities to encourage a love of reading are threaded through many events. Specific support for pupils at the earliest stages of learning to read is currently being established. As well as focusing on securing their confidence and fluency, this programme aims to develop pupils’ research skills.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
As with achievement, attendance is improving over time. The school has provided well- considered support to pupils and their families. This has helped to overcome barriers to attendance.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school is an orderly environment. The clear routines support the high expectations. Most pupils have positive attitudes and are keen to learn. They understand the need for 14 to 16 January 2025
p.2
3
many of the new school rules, including those associated with mobile phones, but are annoyed when things do not seem fair. This is generally linked to inconsistent application of the school rules. Additionally, there are pockets of pupils who are unkind to each other. Pupils are confident that staff will resolve any issues, including bullying, but pupils do not always report problems. These remaining examples where mutual respect is lacking tend to be during unstructured social times.
p.3
3
The provision for careers is a strength of the school. This is comprehensive and well structured, extending from Year 7 to 13. Pupils with SEND get appropriate additional support. Pupils value this support and the information they receive, including from external providers.
p.3
3
The personal development programme is also carefully planned and matched to pupils’ needs. Pupils value the way that more sensitive topics, including consent, respectful relationships and personal safety, are delivered in an age-appropriate manner. They describe how these lessons help them to understand modern Britain and how they can play their part in society.
p.3
3
Leaders know that there is still work to do and they have a clear plan of what is involved. They understand that the pace of the change can be unsettling and have tried to engage with parents and carers to explain the purpose of decisions. They recognise that there is more work to do here.
p.3
3
Staff feel supported. Teaching staff, including those new to the profession, value the professional development they receive. Support staff are pleased that their development opportunities are now starting. For all, there is a clear focus on decisions being about what is in the best interests of the pupils.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Recent changes to establish high expectations for behaviour across the school are not fully embedded, particularly during unstructured social times. There are some pupils who are unkind to each other. The school needs to ensure that actions are taken as intended so there is mutual respect throughout the school. Some classroom tasks do not link well enough to pupils’ prior learning. This means some pupils do not learn as well as they could. The school should strengthen the approaches they have set out to ensure that tasks build on pupils’ learning consistently well. 14 to 16 January 2025
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 14 to 16 January 2025
p.4
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,288
p.5
form
Chair of trustees Inderjit Dhillon and Zarrin Hamid (Co- Chairs) Headteacher Jon Gargan
p.5
form
Dates of previous inspection 20 and 21 March 2014, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
This is the only school in The Westgate School single-academy trust. There have been considerable staff changes since the previous inspection. The headteacher joined the school in September 2023 and many staff, including senior leaders, have joined since then. The school has a resourced provision that caters for up to 15 pupils with physical disability. These pupils have education, health and care plans and are placed by the local authority. The school uses one registered alternative provision. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. 14 to 16 January 2025
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Through no fault of the school, inspection activities were suspended for a short period on 16 January and a new inspector arrived to lead the inspection. A new team joined her on 17 January. All evidence collected over the three days on site was evaluated to determine the grade for each key judgement. Inspectors met with the headteacher, other senior staff and school improvement partners. They also met with the co-chairs of the local governing body, one of whom is also the chair of the trustees. They held telephone calls with representatives from local authority services. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, science, history, modern
p.6
Information about this inspection
foreign languages, mathematics and performing arts. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors also met with the special educational needs coordinator and explored provision for pupils with SEND, including in the resourced provision. Inspectors considered the views of pupils from the pupil survey and by meeting with groups of pupils formally and informally throughout the inspection. The views of parents were considered through responses to Ofsted Parent View.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors also met and held telephone calls with parents. Staff views were considered through the staff survey and in discussions during the inspection. School information was also taken into account, including the school’s own surveys of pupils, parents and staff. Other documentation, including that relating to attendance, behaviour and the work of governors was also evaluated. 14 to 16 January 2025
p.6
Inspection team
Lucy English, lead inspector (15 and 16 January) His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
James Stuart, lead inspector (14 and 15 January) His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Andrew Morrison (14 and 15 January) Ofsted Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Ian Cooksey (14 and 15 January) Ofsted Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Julia Mortimore (14 and 15 January) Ofsted Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
John Burridge (14 January) Ofsted Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Chris Ellison (16 January) His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Russell Bennett (16 January) His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Matthew Haynes (16 January) His Majesty’s Inspector 14 to 16 January 2025
p.7
8
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion