Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Ungraded school inspection

Stogumber CofE Primary School

Inspected 8 Jan 2025 · published 11 Feb 2025 · URN 123774

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Wendy D’Arcy (lead), Gavin Summerfield

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 Jan 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Gavin Summerfield, Wendy D’Arcy

  • Postcode verified

    TA4 3TQ

  • Name on report verified

    Stogumber CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    123774

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−5Mixedmore positive than 6% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveenjoyproudambitiousstrong relationshipsimprovingaccuratelypositive
Criticismgapsdisruptionconcernsnot strongnot yetseriousdisruptnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1359w−8
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,360
about usual (typical 1282)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 51
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 3
Hedged sentences
18%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of a school judged good for overall effectiveness before September 2024: Stogumber CofE Primary School Station Road, Stogumber, Taunton, Somerset TA4 3TQ

p.1

Outcome

Evidence gathered during this ungraded (section 8) inspection suggests that aspects of the school’s work may not be as strong as at the time of the previous inspection. The school’s next inspection will be a graded inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy attending this friendly school, which sits at the heart of the community it serves. The school is proud of the work they do to bring the school and local community together. Christmas cards from the pupils to local residents were warmly received and appreciated.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school is ambitious for what pupils can achieve. It has made great strides in improving the quality of education for pupils. Despite this, improvements are still in the early stages and are not having an impact on the quality of education pupils receive.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils know that trusted adults are there for them when they need to share any worries or concerns. Some pupils behave well. Older pupils focus on their work and are keen to contribute to class discussions. However, occasionally, some pupils do not follow the school’s ‘golden rules’, and they disrupt learning for others.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils benefit from the extensive range of personal development opportunities provided by the school. The school’s determination to ‘bring the world to the pupils’ includes a trip to London, visits to the seaside and museums. This widens pupils’ views of the world and broadens their horizons.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school is determined that pupils will succeed and do well. However, the recent improvements to the curriculum design are in the early stages and have not yet had time to have an impact on pupils’ learning as intended. The school has set out what they want pupils to learn and in what order. This supports pupils to build knowledge sequentially in 8 January 2025

p.1

2

some subjects. For example, pupils use their recall of multiplication knowledge in order to add fractions with different denominators. In some wider curriculum subjects, the school has not yet identified the most important knowledge they want pupils to learn and remember. As a result, pupils have gaps in their knowledge.

p.2

2

In some lessons, teachers do not address pupils’ misconceptions or systematically check that pupils have learned the intended curriculum. They do not effectively ensure that pupils have fully understood new concepts before moving on to new learning. As a result, some pupils continue to make errors in their work and mistakes persist. The school accurately identifies the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). There are clear processes in place to ensure that pupils have achievable and realistic targets based on detailed assessment information. Like their peers, pupils with SEND do not always benefit as much as they could from their learning.

p.2

2

The school uses an effective phonics programme to teach pupils how to read. This begins in Reception Year, where children learn to recognise letters and sounds. Pupils continue to learn phonics through key stage 1 where they learn to decode and read words accurately. Pupils in the early stages of reading read books that match the sounds they know. However, at times, low-level disruption has a negative impact on pupils’ learning. As a result, pupils who struggle to read are not catching up quickly. Pupils enjoy listening to stories their teachers read to them. Older pupils read a wide range of literature. They develop their comprehension knowledge through regular reading activities.

p.2

2

The school has implemented a new behaviour policy. Older pupils talk with confidence about the school’s expectations as well as the consequences when the golden rules are not followed. Most pupils have positive attitudes to learning and are polite and welcoming. Nevertheless, staff expectations of pupils’ behaviour are sometimes not aligned with the school’s policy. At times, low-level disruption persists, and learning is interrupted.

p.2

2

Attendance is a high priority for the school. The school uses effective systems to track patterns of attendance. Strong relationships with pupils and families supports this. As a result, attendance is improving overall.

p.2

2

Pupils’ wider development is a strength of the school. Pupils speak with pride about the opportunities they get to represent their school in local sporting competitions. Pupils understand that everyone is different but know that tolerance and respect are important in the world they live in. Pupils develop their leadership skills in many ways, including in the school council, and being sports leaders and worship leaders. They understand they can make a difference to others, within and outside of their school community.

p.2

2

Since the appointment of the headteacher, the school, supported by the governors, has taken steps to halt the decline and make the necessary improvements. However, they recognise that there is still more work to do. Staff appreciate the care and consideration the school provides to manage their workload. They feel well supported and are proud to work at the school. 8 January 2025

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Expectations for how some pupils should behave are not high enough. At times, low- level disruption is allowed to persist. As a result, pupils’ learning, including in phonics, is hampered. The school must ensure that staff develop the expertise they need to apply the agreed policy for managing behaviour consistently so that all pupils can learn the curriculum well without disruption.  In some subjects, the school has not identified the most important knowledge they want pupils to learn. As a result, there are gaps in what pupils know and remember. The school needs to ensure that the most important knowledge is clearly defined so that pupils build their knowledge sequentially.  In some subjects, teachers do not routinely check for and correct pupils’ misconceptions or gaps in their understanding. This leads to pupils’ mistakes or misunderstandings not being addressed well enough. The school should ensure that

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

teachers routinely identify gaps in knowledge and address misconceptions swiftly.

p.3

Background

Until September 2024, on a graded (section 5) inspection we gave schools an overall effectiveness grade, in addition to the key and provision judgements. Overall effectiveness grades given before September 2024 will continue to be visible on school inspection reports and on Ofsted’s website. From September 2024, graded inspections will not include an overall effectiveness grade. This school was, before September 2024, judged to be good for its overall effectiveness.

p.3

Background

We have now inspected the school to determine whether it has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at that previous inspection. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school’s work has improved significantly or that it may not be as strong as it was at the last inspection, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection. A graded inspection is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good for overall effectiveness in March 2019. 8 January 2025

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 8 January 2025

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Website www.crowcombeandstogumberprimaryschools .co.uk Dates of previous inspection 6 and 7 March 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is much smaller than the average-sized school. It is federated with Crowcombe Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School. There is one headteacher and one governing body. Subject leadership is shared across both schools.  Reception and key stage 1 pupils from both schools are taught in two mixed-age classes at Stogumber Primary School. Key stage 2 pupils from both schools are taught in two mixed-age classes at Crowcombe Primary School. Four inspectors carried out inspections of each school simultaneously.  There have been changes to leadership since the previous inspection. The headteacher took up post in September 2022.  The school is designated as having a religious character. The school is part of the Diocese of Bath and Wells. The most recent section 48 inspection of the school was carried out in September 2023. The school should receive its next section 48 inspection within five school years.

p.5

6

 A breakfast club and an after-school club are held at Crowcombe Primary School and attended by pupils from both schools in the federation. A minibus is used to transport pupils to and from each school.  The school does not use any alternative provision.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors spoke with school leaders, governors and representatives from the local authority and diocese. Meetings were jointly held between the inspectors of both schools in the federation and leaders of the school.  Inspectors visited a sample of lessons, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around

p.6

Information about this inspection

safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school site. Additionally, inspectors spoke to pupils to discuss their views about the school.  Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted’s online survey for parents, Ofsted Parent View, including free-text responses. They also looked at responses to Ofsted’s online staff and pupil surveys.

p.6

Inspection team

Wendy D’Arcy, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Gavin Summerfield His Majesty’s Inspector 8 January 2025

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion