Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Sandal Castle VA Community Primary School

Inspected 8 Jan 2025 · published 10 Feb 2025 · URN 108270

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tracy Duffy (lead), Deborah Sanderson, Donna Waddington, Frances Turner

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 Jan 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Deborah Sanderson, Donna Waddington, Frances Turner, Tracy Duffy

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    WF2 6AS

  • Name on report verified

    Sandal Castle VA Community Primary School

  • URN verified

    108270

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+35Mostly positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveeffectiveeffectivelyenjoyhigh expectationsvery wellwell-plannedclearly
Criticismnot alwaysgapsnot consistentlylacktoo manybelownot yetnot successfully

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1234w+33
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,202
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of Sandal Castle VA Community Primary School Barnsley Road, Sandal, Wakefield, West Yorkshire WF2 6AS

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Good Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 7 and 8 January 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy attending this welcoming, friendly school. They are happy and safe. They know that adults have their best interests at heart.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils understand the school rules and meet the high expectations set in class. In most cases, they play nicely together during breaktimes and lunchtimes. However, some pupils report that they can experience unkind words and behaviours in the playground, and this is not always dealt with by adults in a timely manner.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils benefit from a wide range of experiences beyond the classroom, such as extra- curricular clubs and well-planned trips that help to bring the curriculum alive. Recently introduced pupil leadership roles give some pupils opportunities to contribute to the life of the school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school aspires for all pupils to achieve well. Effective improvements to the curriculum are having a positive impact. However, not all pupils achieve as well as they should in all subject areas yet. This is because the changes to the school’s curriculum are very recent.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

This school has experienced a significant period of turbulence since the last inspection. As this has stabilised, pupils are now benefiting from the many, well-considered improvements that new leaders have brought about. However, the quality of education that pupils receive still needs further improvement.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has recently reviewed the curriculum for all subjects. This is improving experiences for pupils in lessons. Pupils are now remembering what they have been taught. In some subjects, pupils talk confidently about recent learning. The revised curriculum is now clearly sequenced. This supports pupils to build on prior learning.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Staff check on pupils’ learning in lessons. However, the school does not consistently use this information to make sure that gaps and misconceptions are addressed. They cannot be sure that all pupils are making the best possible progress through the curriculum.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

In recent years, too many pupils did not achieve well in the Year 1 phonics check. The school has made changes to address this. The quality of phonics learning has improved. Expectations are higher and regular support is given to pupils who need this extra help. More pupils in Year 1 are now achieving well in reading. Reading outcomes at key stage 2 are below national expectations, especially for disadvantaged pupils. Leaders have identified that the reading curriculum beyond Year 1 does not build well on pupils’ more recent strong start. Pupils do not have sufficient opportunity to develop their fluency and comprehension skills.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The newly implemented writing curriculum focuses on inspiring pupils to write, using high-quality texts. However, pupils’ understanding of the basic skills in writing, such as 7 and 8 January 2025

p.2

3

letter formation, are less secure. This is because the school has not ensured that these are taught systematically from the early years.

p.3

3

The school swiftly identifies the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities. They access an ambitious curriculum that enables them to learn successfully alongside their peers. Plans to support these pupils contain clear targets. This provides staff with the information they need to provide effective support.

p.3

3

Children in the early years enjoy their learning. Staff and children share positive relationships. The learning environment, particularly outdoors, is not yet planned with sufficient purpose. This means that learning is not always well matched to children’s varying needs and the curriculum. Some children do not fully make the progress of which they are capable. Leaders are aware of this and have sought external advice to develop this further.

p.3

3

Pupils know what is expected of their behaviour and conduct. The behaviour policy outlines expectations clearly and children behave very well in lessons. A lack of clarity and consistency at unstructured times has led to some pupils behaving less well than they do in class. However, pupils’ behaviour often improves in direct response to rewards and consequences. The school’s previous work to promote pupils’ personal and character development has resulted in gaps in pupils’ learning. Leaders have begun to make improvements to the opportunities they offer. For example, they have introduced a new personal, social and health education curriculum. This underpins the school values and teaches pupils the importance of respect for others and the importance of good behaviour for everyone’s safety and well-being.

p.3

3

The new leadership team has driven rapid and sustained change in all areas, with skill and determination. As a result, the education provided is having more of a positive impact on pupils’ learning. Most parents and carers have recognised these improvements. Staff are extremely positive about the support they receive from leaders. Governors are aware of their statutory responsibilities. They use their skill and experience to provide appropriate challenge and support.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some subjects, the school’s systems to check what pupils know and have remembered over time do not provide staff with sufficient information to be able to identify and address gaps in pupils’ knowledge effectively. This makes it difficult for staff to check and help pupils learn the intended curriculum securely. The school should ensure its systems enable staff to evaluate the impact of the curriculum on pupils’ learning and address any gaps effectively. 7 and 8 January 2025

p.3

4

 The school’s revised reading curriculum beyond early reading and phonics is in the very early stages of being implemented. Pupils do not build successfully on their phonics knowledge to develop fluency and comprehension. The school should ensure that the revised reading curriculum supports pupils across the school to read fluently and with understanding effectively.  The English curriculum does not set out well enough the basic skills for writing, beginning in the early years. As a result, pupils are not able to write with accuracy. The school should ensure that the curriculum identifies these basic skills from the early years clearly and progressively so that pupils build fluency in the basic skills and are able to write independently with confidence and fluency over time.  Behaviour during unstructured times does not always meet the same high standard as inside the classroom. Staff members’ expectations of behaviour at these times are

p.4

4

inconsistent. As a result, some pupils demonstrate behaviour that falls below that expected by leaders. The school should ensure that all staff have the skills and expertise to demonstrate consistent expectations of behaviour throughout the school day.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 7 and 8 January 2025

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 16 and 17 October 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The headteacher was appointed in September 2023.  The school is a voluntary-aided Church of England primary school and is part of the Diocese of Leeds. Its last inspection under section 48 of the Education Act 2005 was in October 2023. The school’s next section 48 inspection will be within eight school years.  The school does not currently use any alternative provision for any of its pupils.  The school runs a breakfast club and an after-school club.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 7 and 8 January 2025

p.5

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors spoke to the headteacher and other school leaders.  Inspectors spoke to members of the local governing board.  Inspectors spoke to a representative from the local authority and spoke with a representative from the Diocese of Leeds.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, history, and design and technology. For each deep dive, inspectors held a discussion about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at some samples of pupils’ work.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors; reviewed the single

p.6

6

central record, took account of the views of leaders, staff, and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children’s interests first.  An inspector visited the school’s breakfast club.  Inspectors spoke to parents and carers at the beginning of the school day.  Inspectors reviewed responses to Ofsted’s parent survey, Ofsted Parent View. They also considered responses to Ofsted’s staff and pupil surveys.

p.6

Inspection team

Tracy Duffy, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Donna Waddington Ofsted Inspector 7 and 8 January 2025

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion