Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

100% Effective Limited

Inspected 15 Jan 2025 · published 6 Feb 2025 · URN 2804855

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ian Frear

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Jan 2025

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ian Frear

  • Postcode verified

    BD18 3DZ

  • Name on report verified

    100% Effective Limited

  • URN verified

    2804855

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+21Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivesecureindependentclearpositivesafe
Criticismlimitedat riskconcernsbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,125
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

100% Effective Limited Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Ian Frear, His Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Inspection dates: 14 and 15 January 2025

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address: 1 Parkview Court St Pauls Road Shipley West Yorkshire BD18 3DZ Monitoring visit: 100% Effective Limited, 14 and 15 January 2025

p.1

Context and focus of visit

Ofsted undertakes to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision funded by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

100% Effective Limited is an independent learning provider that started to deliver apprenticeships in May 2023. At the time of this monitoring visit, there were six apprentices enrolled on either the level 4 improvement practitioner standard or the level 5 improvement specialist standard. All apprentices were in the West Midlands or the Greater London area. Apprentices were all aged 19 years and over.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders provide level 4 and 5 business improvement apprenticeships to meet the training needs of companies. The apprenticeship provision is a small proportion of their wider commercial training offer. Leaders introduced apprenticeships in response to their clients’ requests, including from manufacturers, banks, and retail companies.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders have a clear rationale for their virtual delivery model. As apprentices are located across England, the virtual model is the only practical one. Leaders provide apprentices with a well-structured programme that includes five-day block training, monthly coaching sessions and additional online learning resources. Leaders have based the apprenticeship on their commercially funded green belt and black belt lean Six Sigma accredited courses.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders have a few appropriate arrangements for evaluating the quality of provision. They collect and review feedback from apprentices following training, which is generally positive. The managing director meets frequently with staff to identify improvements that they need to make. However, these meetings do not capture the progress that apprentices are making. Leaders rightly recognise that, if their plans to expand the provision come to fruition, they will need to significantly enhance their quality assurance arrangements. Monitoring visit: 100% Effective Limited, 14 and 15 January 2025 Leaders do not provide apprentices with any training on personal development topics such as careers advice and guidance. They do not raise apprentices’ awareness of how to keep themselves safe from risks relating to radicalisation and extremism.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Although current apprentices already have a very secure grasp of English and mathematics, leaders do not have arrangements for identifying, or further developing, apprentices’ English and mathematical skills should they have any apprentices who need to achieve these qualifications.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders liaise with national bodies in their sector and the Council for Six Sigma approves their training as being of good quality which provides some useful assurance of the provision. However, beyond those interactions there are no other accountability measures, such as via a governing body.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders plan and sequence the apprenticeship curriculum logically. Staff use their experience of business improvement and their qualified status as ‘master black belts’ in lean Six Sigma techniques to first teach apprentices the fundamental principles of continuous improvement. They start by teaching topics such as project management and data and impact analysis, before guiding apprentices to apply these newly learned techniques to their workplace projects.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Staff take sufficient account of apprentices’ starting points. They ensure that apprentices have the necessary seniority within their businesses to meet the requirements of the apprenticeship. Staff adapt the curriculum for every apprentice. For instance, apprentices who work in a commercial or pharmaceutical business receive contextualised training that is different to those in a manufacturing or engineering setting.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices apply what they learn at work to become much more effective and often contribute to cost savings or more efficient working processes in their business. For example, apprentices developing a nationwide strategy related to the increased need for testing for Legionella in water supplies have streamlined several processes. These changes maximise the available space in the laboratories to conduct such testing.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Most employers, apprentices and tutors meet frequently to discuss the progress that apprentices make. Apprentices receive clear guidance about the areas that they need to improve, as well as where their projects are having demonstrable impact. However, there are instances where all parties do not meet often enough and this has resulted in a few apprentices making slower-than-expected progress. Monitoring visit: 100% Effective Limited, 14 and 15 January 2025 Tutors prepare apprentices sufficiently well for end-point assessment. Apprentices understand what they need to complete before they can enter the gateway, including submission of a final project and portfolio of work. However, apprentices are unaware of the grade they are currently working at, or the marks they need to secure a higher grade.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not have appropriate safeguarding arrangements in place. There are no formal arrangements for identifying or reporting safeguarding concerns. The designated safeguarding officer has not completed any training in relation to this role. Other staff involved in the apprenticeship have had no safeguarding training.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Leaders have a ‘Prevent’ duty policy in place but do not have a ‘Prevent’ duty risk assessment or action plan.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not have a process for identifying if an adult is vulnerable and recognise that they need to put this in place. They currently consider that if an apprentice was vulnerable, or at risk, they would identify this during their frequent one-to-one coaching sessions. Monitoring visit: 100% Effective Limited, 14 and 15 January 2025 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Insufficient progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Insufficient progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Insufficient progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Insufficient progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion