Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Dec 2024
- Inspectors verified
Mark Anderton
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
CO4 5PA
- Name on report verified
Langham Oaks
- URN verified
1213822
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2023.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- School leaders should formalise, review and monitor the incentive and rewards policy for children in residence. p.5
- School leaders should ensure that training in mental health awareness is sourced and attended by staff. p.5
- They should also ensure that training identified as a priority to meet children’s individual needs is completed by staff promptly. p.5
- School leaders should ensure that internal investigations following allegations against staff are organised in a manner that assists effective monitoring. p.5
- School leaders should ensure that part-time staff receive termly supervision and that all staff’s annual appraisals identify annual objectives that support staff’s continuing professional development. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment4
“School leaders have improved the approach to making risk assessments.” p.3Wellbeing & mental health3
“Additionally, further training in mental health awareness has not yet taken place.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,174
- shorter than usual (typical 1609)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 43
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 1 Langham Oaks School Road, Langham, Colchester, Essex CO4 5PA Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this residential special school
Langham Oaks is a residential special school with academy status, located in a rural village near Colchester.
p.1
Information about this residential special school
There are 74 students at the school, of whom 25 board. The school can accommodate 28 students in the residential provision for between one and four nights per week. The school caters for students with social, emotional and mental health needs.
p.1
Information about this residential special school
The residential manager has been in post since January 2022. He has the necessary experience and qualification for the role.
p.1
Information about this residential special school
The inspectors only inspected the social care provision at this school.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of previous inspection: 14 November 2023
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: requires improvement to be good Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 2
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
At the time of the inspection, seven children were staying in residence. All these children contributed to the inspection. Children say they enjoy their stays, make friends and build strong and trusting relationships with staff.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children value a wide range of activities that enrich their school day. Children regularly participate in bike maintenance sessions, bike riding, countryside walks, kayaking and paddle boarding. There is a good range of sporting activities that are enjoyed by children. These opportunities improve children’s well-being and cater for their interests. For many children, this provides them with experiences they have not had previously.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
School leaders have improved the systems for planning, monitoring and reviewing the support provided to children. Children’s placement plans are now detailed and reflect children’s individual needs, preferences and daily routines. Staff follow these plans. Staff identify and work with children towards residential goals that are matched to children’s education, health and care plans. As a result, children are now receiving more focused support and make measured progress with their social skills and ability to manage their emotions.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children who stay in residence have improved attendance at school and increased ability to achieve their educational targets when compared to day students.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
School leaders have considered children’s views in relation to their time in residence well. Children participate in regular meetings to reflect on their experiences. Children complete termly surveys, and their views contribute to the school’s improvement plan. When children have had concerns, they have been supported to make complaints and feel satisfied with school leaders’ responses and actions.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
School leaders have introduced a new life skills programme for children. This provides improved scope for supporting and monitoring children’s progress in their independence skills. This work is in its infancy, but children are motivated and are beginning to make good progress in this area.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Families generally report good communication with the staff and recognise the progress children make at the school.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are invested in a new incentive and reward scheme that reinforces positive behaviour. This has had an encouraging effect. However, there is no policy in residence to guide staff on the implementation of the scheme or to monitor its effectiveness. This could lead to inconsistences from staff that give children mixed messages. Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 3
p.2
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Children’s safety and welfare are given a high priority. Child protection concerns are shared appropriately with external agencies and parents. The designated safeguarding lead and deputies have strong oversight of safeguarding practice. They link with residential staff and school leaders to regularly discuss, monitor and action any emerging concerns.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff have a thorough understanding of risks to children and their individual needs. Staff are clear about the process of raising safeguarding concerns and know when to do so. Staff work with children to help them understand different risks and support them to understand how to stay safe.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Children feel secure and relaxed in residence. The dynamics between children are largely positive. On occasion, when there are disagreements or low-level conflicts between children, these are managed well by staff.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
School leaders have improved the approach to making risk assessments. Children’s risk assessments are now regularly reviewed and individualised. Staff follow clear guidance in relation to reducing areas of risk for children, including substance misuse, online safety, self-harm and exploitation.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Children’s behaviour is good in residence. Staff successfully use de-escalation strategies to respond to children’s emotions. Consequences are used infrequently and proportionately. No physical interventions have been necessary. The residential manager has overseen improvements in the depth of staff’s recording of incidents. This has increased the quality of the residential manager’s subsequent analysis of incidents to inform future behavioural support strategies for children.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The headteacher responds appropriately to any allegations against staff. Referrals are made to the local area designated officer promptly. Appropriate protective measures are put in place, and investigations are completed. However, records relating to investigations are poorly organised and do not fully capture the process or conclusions that led to the actions identified. Although this has not had an impact on children’s safety, it does not assist effective monitoring of concerns over time.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The residential manager is qualified and experienced. He is calm, child-centred and considered in his approach. The residential manager is supported well by the headteacher and trust leaders.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The shortfalls identified at the previous inspection have all been successfully addressed. There are no unmet standards. School leaders have a clear action plan to support further development in the wider school and in residence. An independent visitor provides good-quality external monitoring that assists in improving the quality of care and support further. Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 4 School leaders have improved the communication links between education and residential staff. Handover systems are now more informative, and reporting systems have been further developed. This has ensured a more unified approach to children’s support.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff are trained in a range of areas that enhance their skills. School leaders have developed monitoring systems to maintain more effective oversight of staff training. Previous staff training gaps have been addressed in physical intervention and responding to risks of exploitation. However, not all staff completed training in suicide ideation awareness promptly when this was identified as a priority in the school’s internal quality audit. Additionally, further training in mental health awareness has not yet taken place. This has the potential to limit staff’s ability to understand and respond to all of the individual and emerging needs of children.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff feel well supported by the residential manager. They receive regular supervision and annual appraisals to reflect on their practice and discuss children’s needs. However, staff’s annual appraisal objectives are not sufficiently identified or sufficiently challenging to contribute to their professional development. Additionally, part-time education staff who work in residence do not receive formal and recorded supervision from the residential manager. Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 5
p.4
Points for improvement
School leaders should formalise, review and monitor the incentive and rewards policy for children in residence. School leaders should ensure that training in mental health awareness is sourced and attended by staff. They should also ensure that training identified as a priority to meet children’s individual needs is completed by staff promptly. School leaders should ensure that internal investigations following allegations against staff are organised in a manner that assists effective monitoring. School leaders should ensure that part-time staff receive termly supervision and that all staff’s annual appraisals identify annual objectives that support staff’s continuing professional development.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 6
p.5
Residential special school details
Social care unique reference number: 1213822
p.6
Residential special school details
Headteacher/teacher in charge: Alan Wells
p.6
Residential special school details
Type of school: Residential Special School
p.6
Residential special school details
Email address: alan.wells@langhamoaks.co.uk
p.6
Inspector
Mark Anderton, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 7 and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion