Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Little Cherubs Solihull
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
31 Jan 2025
- URN verified
EY539892
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Health & safety4
“Staff have improved their knowledge of risk assessment.” p.1Leadership & governance2
“Leaders and staff have responded positively to the actions set.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 1
- Words of findings
- 307
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 3 January 2025, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. The inspection report sets out the actions the provider was required to take to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 27 January 2025 and the 31 January 2025, we carried out regulatory visits, to monitor how the provider had responded to the actions set. We found that the provider had improved their knowledge and understanding of child protection procedures. Leaders and staff have responded positively to the actions set. Leaders and staff have undergone safeguarding training and know fully understand what to do in the event of an allegation against a member of staff. Extensive building work has been completed to improve the overall safety of the premises, including its fire safety. New fire doors, a new fire detection system and new evacuation procedures have been implemented. Staff have improved their knowledge of risk assessment. All hazards have been removed and unsuitable items replaced. Toilets have also been fixed, removed and replaced. We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion