Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Ungraded school inspection

Earl Sterndale CofE Primary School

Inspected 10 Dec 2024 · published 30 Jan 2025 · URN 112821

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kate Mann (lead), Shaheen Hussain

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Dec 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Kate Mann, Shaheen Hussain

  • Postcode verified

    SK17 0BS

  • Name on report verified

    Earl Sterndale CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    112821

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−9Mixedmore positive than 5% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseenjoystrongpositiveeffectiveclearwarmnurturingclearly
Criticismnot alwaysconcernsnot strongseriousinconsistentdisruptdisruptivestruggle

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1239w−12
  • Safeguarding9w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,242
about usual (typical 1282)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 51
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 3
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 73%Safeguarding 1%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Inspection of a school judged good for overall effectiveness before September 2024: Earl Sterndale CofE Primary School Earl Sterndale, Buxton, Derbyshire SK17 0BS

p.1

Outcome

Evidence gathered during this ungraded (section 8) inspection suggests that aspects of the school’s work may not be as strong as at the time of the previous inspection. The school’s next inspection will be a graded inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are at the heart of this warm and nurturing primary school. This is perfectly summarised by one pupil, who said, ‘If you need a friend, this is a good place to be.’ Pupils enjoy coming to school because they feel well cared for and supported. Staff know each pupil well. Pupils trust that any concerns or worries will be listened to and addressed by the attentive adults around them.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils get on well together during social times. During playtime, there are lots of activities for them to enjoy. However, during lessons, behaviour is inconsistent. Adults do not make the expectations of how pupils should behave clear. This leads to instances where pupils’ learning is disrupted by the actions of others.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school places a strong emphasis on pupils’ personal development. Pupils greatly appreciate the wide range of opportunities available to them. They enjoy memorable and enriching experiences.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy their lessons. They speak enthusiastically about the variety of subjects they study. However, pupils are not prepared well enough for the next stage of their education because the curriculum does not build logically and sequentially across the school.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school does not have a clear vision for its curriculum, including in mathematics. Leaders have not defined what pupils need to learn and when they should learn it. Teachers do not always focus on the most important knowledge they want pupils to remember at each stage of their learning. As a result, pupils struggle to remember what 10 December 2024

p.1

2

they have learned. They do not have a solid foundation of knowledge to reference and build upon.

p.2

2

The reading curriculum is stronger. In phonics, the curriculum is more carefully designed. The school has outlined clearly what knowledge pupils should learn. Younger children make a strong start with phonics, enjoying activities such as learning letter sounds and recognising letters. Adults often listen to pupils reading. Pupils practise reading books that are well matched to the sounds they are learning. Teachers regularly check pupils’ understanding. However, when mistakes are identified, adults do not always use effective methods to correct pupils. This delays pupils’ progress in developing reading fluency.

p.2

2

Teachers sometimes do not check what pupils know and can do sufficiently well. Gaps in pupils’ knowledge and understanding are sometimes missed. This hinders pupils’ learning. Pupils who learn in mixed-age classes are not always given work that matches their stage of development or their needs closely. This includes pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities.

p.2

2

The personal development of every child at Earl Sterndale is of great importance. The school is committed to broadening pupils’ understanding of life in modern Britain and teaching them to value and respect differences. Mental health is a priority, with various strategies in place to help pupils recognise and manage their emotions. Pupils appreciate the support provided to maintain a healthy mind. A wide range of extra-curricular opportunities is available, including visits to places of worship and choir concerts and residential trips. Pupils also engage in leadership roles, sharing ideas to improve their school community. Pupils learn about different faiths and religions.

p.2

2

At playtime, pupils behave and collaborate well. They show care, compassion and tolerance of each other. However, staff’s expectations of pupils’ behaviour during structured times are not high enough. As a result, some pupils disrupt the learning of others. The school ensures that pupils attend well. Absences are carefully monitored.

p.2

2

Parents and carers are positive about their children’s experiences of the school, typically describing the school as being like a ‘family’. Governors are committed to the school and understand their responsibilities. However, they do not always gather sufficient information to develop a clear and accurate understanding of the school’s performance. Recently, steps have been taken to address this. Staff appreciate the school’s actions to support their workload. The training they have received has had a positive impact on supporting pupils’ mental health and well-being.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 10 December 2024

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some subjects, including mathematics, the curriculum does not identify what pupils should learn and by when. Teachers do not set tasks that enable pupils to build sufficient knowledge. Leaders must ensure that the knowledge that pupils need to know and understand is clearly identified and that activities enable pupils to achieve the curriculum’s aims.  The school’s expectations of pupils’ behaviour are not high enough. Too many pupils do not pay attention to what adults are teaching them. The school should ensure there is a clear approach to managing behaviour and that low-level disruptive behaviour is addressed swiftly.  Leaders, including the governors, have not identified the weaknesses in the school’s curriculum. They have, therefore, not taken action to remedy them. As a result, pupils do not receive an appropriate standard of education. Leaders, including the governors, should take action to improve the quality of education on offer at the school.

p.3

Background

Until September 2024, on a graded (section 5) inspection we gave schools an overall effectiveness grade, in addition to the key and provision judgements. Overall effectiveness grades given before September 2024 will continue to be visible on school inspection reports and on Ofsted’s website. From September 2024, graded inspections will not include an overall effectiveness grade. This school was, before September 2024, judged to be good for its overall effectiveness.

p.3

Background

We have now inspected the school to determine whether it has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at that previous inspection. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school’s work has improved significantly or that it may not be as strong as it was at the last inspection, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection. A graded inspection is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually, this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good for overall effectiveness in May 2015. 10 December 2024

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 10 December 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 9 January 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The chair of governors took up their responsibility in September 2024.  The school does not currently use any alternative provision.  The school provides a breakfast club and an after-school club.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. 10 December 2024

p.5

6

 Inspectors visited a sample of lessons, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also spoke to curriculum leaders and listened to pupils reading to a member of staff.  Inspectors met with leaders, staff, pupils and those with responsibility for governance, including the chair of the governing body. The inspectors also spoke with a representative of the local authority.  Inspectors observed breaktimes, lunchtimes and the start of the school day.  Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s staff and pupil surveys. They took account of the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments.

p.6

Inspection team

Kate Mann, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Shaheen Hussain His Majesty’s Inspector 10 December 2024

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion