Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Granby House Nursery
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
27 Jan 2025
- URN verified
EY281276
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 363
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 5 December 2024, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to EYFS requirement heading, accident or injury, risk assessment, information for parents and carers, information and record keeping.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 22 and 24 January 2025, we carried out a regulatory telephone call. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements and had taken action to put this right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We found the provider had improved the procedure to assess accidents and or injury to children and to provide parents with a detailed account of any injuries sustained and of the first aid treatment given. The provider has also tightened the checks that are carried out daily on resources before they are accessible to children as part of their risk assessment process.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 24 January 2025, we found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have issued an action for the provider to take.
p.1
Summary of outcome
notify the person who made the complaint of the outcome of the investigation within 28 days of having received the complaint.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We will monitor the provider's response to ensure the action is successfully completed. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 28 January 2025, the provider responded to the action set. We found that the provider had improved their procedure to respond to a complaint in writing and to provide the complainant with the response within 28 days of having received the complaint.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare action raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion