Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Archbishop Runcie CofE First School
Summary
Paul Martindale (lead), Louise Mallin
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 Dec 2024
- Inspectors verified
Louise Mallin, Paul Martindale
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
NE3 1US
- Name on report verified
Archbishop Runcie Church of England Voluntary Aided First School
- URN verified
108495
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance5
“Governors are ambitious and determined.” p.3Attendance2
“Attendance is improving.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,017
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Archbishop Runcie Church of England Voluntary Aided First School Christon Road, Gosforth, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne, and Wear NE3 1US
p.1
Inspection dates: 10 and 11 December 2024
p.1
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 10 and 11 December 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are happy and proud to attend Archbishop Runcie Church of England First School. They flourish and live up to the school vision to ‘Be courageous, be strong. Do everything in love.’ They enjoy being taught in a nurturing and caring environment from the moment they start in Nursery.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are kind to each other. They willingly take on the many roles and responsibilities around school. Pupils who are library champions, play leaders or in the school council take on their role with pride. They share in each other’s successes in the weekly celebration worship.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils behave well. They show care and consideration when letting each other past in corridors or by waiting patiently for their turn in activities. Outside, pupils enjoy the variety of physical activities and the more relaxed areas of the playground, such as the reading shed.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils know that staff are ambitious for them as learners. They achieve well across the curriculum. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) typically learn alongside their peers and achieve well. Their needs are carefully met. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage in their education.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school rightly prioritises the importance of reading. Staff are well trained, and pupils receive high-quality teaching. Regular checks are made on pupils’ progress. Those who fall behind are quickly identified and receive the additional support they need. Pupils practise reading using books that are closely matched to the sounds they have learned. The school is aware that some less-experienced readers need more practice to develop their fluency. Pupils achieve well, and this is reflected in the school’s outcomes.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The curriculum is well sequenced and reviewed regularly by the school. Leaders have high ambition for all pupils. Staff use a variety of checks to identify gaps in pupils’ knowledge. The curriculum is largely adapted to address any gaps that may arise. The school is introducing consistent strategies in lessons to help pupils to remember important knowledge. In mathematics, pupils enjoy applying their learning through reasoning and problem-solving activities. This enables staff to carefully check that pupils know and remember more.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Staff share their subject knowledge well. This helps to improve the quality of work across subjects, as evident in pupils’ impressive work in their sketchbooks in art. In most subjects, activities are well planned to support the intended learning. However, on occasions, the activities that pupils are set do not deepen pupils’ understanding as well as they could.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
In many subjects, staff enhance pupils’ knowledge with practical application in local study or fieldwork. In geography, for example, educational visits reinforce what pupils have 10 and 11 December 2024
p.2
3
learned in previous lessons, and pupils enjoy using resources such as atlases to learn about different places around the world. They can recall recent learning and things they have been taught in the past. Pupils with SEND are well supported through adaptations in their work, or where necessary, through the support of well-trained adults.
p.3
3
The school checks pupils’ understanding with increasing accuracy. However, on some occasions, misconceptions persist and are not addressed as well as they could be. This slows pupils’ understanding of new knowledge.
p.3
3
In early years, the curriculum is enhanced by links to well-chosen books. There is a careful balance between adult-led activities and children’s play. Staff have a good understanding of children’s starting points and know the children well. Children receive timely focused tasks to enable them to learn well. Relationships between both staff and children are warm and friendly.
p.3
3
Attendance is improving. The school develops good relationships with parents and carers and works proactively with those who need support to improve their attendance.
p.3
3
The school’s work to support the wider development of pupils is strong. Pupils know how the school values apply both in school and more widely in the local community. Pupils are also encouraged to be ‘agents of change’ and are rightly proud of their achievements. They regularly tidy the local park and have written to their Member of Parliament to improve road safety in the area. Pupils are taught to stay safe online. There is a wide range of clubs and educational visits to broaden pupils’ experiences.
p.3
3
Governors are ambitious and determined. They have a range of skills and knowledge to carry out their responsibilities effectively. There is effective support and challenge in place for leaders. Leaders check staff well-being closely and consider their workload. Staff appreciate this support, which has helped to develop and maintain a strong team ethos.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In a small number of subjects, some planned activities do not match the intended learning well enough. This means that pupils do not deepen their learning as effectively as they could. The school should work with staff to ensure that the activities that pupils are set consistently enable them to learn the intended curriculum. The school does not consistently identify misconceptions in pupils’ work. As a result, some errors persist. The school needs to ensure that misconceptions are consistently identified and addressed to further improve pupils’ learning. 10 and 11 December 2024
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 10 and 11 December 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Website www.archbishop-runcie.eschools.co.uk
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 25 and 26 June 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school currently offers both breakfast and after-school provision. The school has a Christian character. It is part of the Diocese of Newcastle. It was last inspected under section 48 of the Education Act 2005 in September 2024. The school is a partner school to the Gosforth Schools’ Trust. The school does not currently use any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 10 and 11 December 2024
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, senior leaders, teachers, and pupils. The lead inspector met with members of the board of governors, including the chair of governors. The lead inspector also met with a representative from both the Diocese of Newcastle and the local authority. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, geography, and art. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of their work. The lead inspector
p.6
6
listened to some pupils read to staff. Inspectors also considered the curriculum in other subjects. The inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around school. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff, and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors took account of a range of other information, including curriculum plans, policies and documentation regarding behaviour and attendance, and minutes of governing body meetings. Inspectors took account of the views of pupils, parents and staff through discussions and their responses to Ofsted’s surveys.
p.6
Inspection team
Paul Martindale, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Louise Mallin Ofsted Inspector 10 and 11 December 2024
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion