Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Happitime Playgroup LTD
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Happitime Playgroup Ltd
- Group reference verified
RP523634
- Inspection date verified
17 Dec 2024
- Inspectors verified
Jenny Gordon
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
E5 9RB
- Name on report verified
Happitime Playgroup LTD
- URN verified
EY412012
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- These weaknesses in safeguarding processes compromise children's welfare. p.2
- The provider does not consistently follow robust vetting processes to recruit new members of staff. p.2
- This is a breach of the requirements of the early years foundation stage. p.2
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 844
- about usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Happitime Playgroup LTD Unit 3, 142 Lea Bridge Road, London E5 9RB
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Staff do not have a good enough knowledge and understanding of child protection processes. The provider does not consistently follow safer recruitment processes at all times. These weaknesses in safeguarding processes compromise children's welfare.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Staff build warm relationships with children. Children run to greet them when they see them in the morning. Staff speak in calm and positive tones to children throughout the day. They praise children warmly with descriptive praise. For example, children smile proudly as staff exclaim, 'Wow, you are squeezing the play dough so hard.' However, staff do not provide some children with sufficient opportunities to develop their curiosity and problem-solving skills. They do not consistently plan well-thought-out learning opportunities or use effective questioning to help children to develop and extend their play.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Staff provide a wide range of activities for children to participate in. For example, children enjoy climbing on the climbing frame, playing with the water and building with construction toys. Staff support children to follow their interests and choose what they would like to play with. However, staff do not carefully consider how to ensure that each child accesses learning opportunities in all areas of the early years foundation stage. This impacts on the progress that children make.
p.2
need to do better?
n Staff do not accurately identify child protection concerns that need to be referred to external agencies. They do not understand the processes to follow if they have a concern about a child. This impacts on children's well-being. n The provider does not consistently follow robust vetting processes to recruit new members of staff. For example, they do not always take up references when new staff are appointed. This means that the suitability of all staff members to work with children cannot be assured. n The provider does not ensure that all members of the committee, who are required to do so, complete the necessary suitability checks with Ofsted. This is a breach of the requirements of the early years foundation stage. n The provider does not store records and information in a well-organised manner. They cannot find important documents, such as paediatric first-aid certificates. Therefore, the provider does not know important information, such as the exact
p.2
need to do better?
dates when first-aid training expires. This does not ensure that the setting is safe for children at all times. n The provider does not consistently, carefully consider how to sequence learning for children in each area of the early years foundation stage. Too often, staff do not provide individualised learning opportunities for children who are at different
p.2
need to do better?
17 December 2024 ages and stages of development. This impacts on opportunities, in particular for older children, to develop their problem-solving skills and curiosity. n Staff give children some opportunities to develop their communication and language skills. For example, children enjoy listening to stories and doing the actions as they sing songs. However, staff do not consistently use a wide enough range of new and ambitious vocabulary during their interactions with children. This does not support all children to consistently make progress in their language development. n The provider does not ensure that arrangements for the key-person system are effective enough. When a key person leaves the setting, staff do not promptly assign a replacement, or make parents aware of who their child's new key person is. This means that staff are not able to carefully consider gaps in some children's learning and support them to close these gaps through well-planned
p.2
need to do better?
learning opportunities. n The support that staff provide for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is a strength of the setting. Staff work well with external professionals to set appropriate targets for children with SEND. They use strategies recommended by these professionals to support children. For example, staff help children to understand the routines of the setting well. They use countdowns and visual symbols to support children to transition to the next part of the routine. n Staff form positive parent partnerships. Parents and carers spend time in the setting as they drop off their children. This supports children to happily transition into the setting every day. Staff offer regular feedback to parents about what their children have been doing. Parents find staff approachable and appreciate the support they offer if they have any concerns about their children's development.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
ensure that all staff, including leaders, have a suitable understanding of child protection processes and procedures 24/01/2025
p.3
Due date
17 December 2024 improve the processes for safer recruitment 24/01/2025
p.3
Due date
ensure that all committee members who are required to do so complete required suitability checks with Ofsted 24/01/2025
p.4
Due date
make sure that all required records and information are kept in a well-organised manner, to ensure that the setting is safe and efficiently managed 24/01/2025
p.4
Due date
ensure that all children receive consistently meaningful learning in all areas of the curriculum, with a particular focus on the curriculum for communication and language 24/01/2025
p.4
Due date
improve key-person arrangements, including when there are changes in staffing. 24/01/2025
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY412012 Local authority Hackney Inspection number 10372848 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register Day care type Sessional day care
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 24 Number of children on roll 10 Name of registered person Happitime Playgroup Ltd
p.5
reference number
Telephone number 02085339988 Date of previous inspection 21 May 2019
p.5
Information about this early years setting
Happitime Playgroup LTD registered in 2010 and is situated in Clapton, in the London Borough of Hackney. The setting is open during term time from 9am to 3pm, Monday to Friday. It offers government funded childcare for children aged two, three and four years. There are three members of staff, two of whom hold appropriate early years professional qualifications at level 3 and above.
p.5
Inspection activities
n The manager joined the inspector on a learning walk and talked to the inspector about the curriculum and what they want children to learn. n Children spoke with the inspector during the inspection. n The inspector talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided and assessed the impact on children's learning. n The inspector spoke to several parents during the inspection and took account of their views. n The manager and the inspector carried out a joint observation of an activity. n The inspector looked at relevant documentation and reviewed evidence of the suitability of staff working in the setting.
p.6
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Inspection activities
17 December 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion