Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

The Caldecott School

Inspected 28 Nov 2024 · URN 1276600

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Nov 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Sara Stoker

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    TN25 6PW

  • Name on report verified

    The Caldecott School

  • URN verified

    1276600

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2023.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 36% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveexcellentpositiveoutstandingsuccessfulmake good progressindependentconsistent
Criticismconcernsnot metpoornot independent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1393w+42
  • What needs to improve56w−56

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,442
about usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 43
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 76%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential special school - The Caldecott School 1 The Caldecott School Station Road, Smeeth, Ashford, Kent TN25 6PW Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential special school

This is a non-maintained special school which provides a service for day and residential children between the ages of seven and 16 years of age. It is a school for children who experience social, emotional and/or mental health difficulties and who may also have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or autism. The residential provision can accommodate up to 10 children. At the time of this inspection, there were three children in residence.

p.1

Information about this residential special school

The inspector only inspected the social care provision at this school.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of previous inspection: 28 November 2023

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: outstanding Inspection report for residential special school - The Caldecott School 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Since the last inspection, one child has been supported to join the residential provision following a successful transition plan. There is careful consideration of any new children that may come to stay at the residential school. This includes an extensive assessment process, visits to children and a collaborative approach with their families, carers and professional networks.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The children all continue to make good progress. This ranges from support by staff to learn independent skills, such as cooking, and how children make developments with their social and emotional well-being. All of the children contribute their views to their placement plans, which guide staff on how to support them with their daily routines, targets and progress. These plans are regularly updated to reflect changes to the children’s ongoing development.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

All of the children are attending school, and there is excellent communication with the school staff and the residential staff to provide consistent support for the children to help them make progress. The children all feed back that they like going to school and have positive friendships with other children, which is important to them.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The home is large, bright and spacious with ample areas for children to learn, play and relax. Each of the children has personalised areas of the home to suit their sensory needs. For example, one child has a pickleball room to play in when they may be feeling overwhelmed. This personal approach to support children helps them to manage if they feel under stress and to relax.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The head of boarding ensures that children’s experiences are adapted to their specialist interests so that they make continued progress and build positive relationships with staff. Children enjoy a range of activities and experiences during their stays. The staff give the children regular opportunities to share their views, and children can decide what activities they would like to do, such as trampolining, cinema trips, bike rides and visits with friends. The children have regular discussions with staff about how their week is going, what they have enjoyed and any worries they may have.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The children can confidently say who they would talk to within the staff team if they are unhappy or worried about something. However, there are no arrangements for an independent person to visit the children to provide them with an external person to contact should they wish. Therefore, this standard is not met.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The staff are aware of their responsibilities in keeping children safe and can demonstrate how they follow safeguarding practice. If they are concerned about a child, they escalate this to the head of boarding, who ensures that appropriate risk Inspection report for residential special school - The Caldecott School 3 measures are in place. For example, when one child’s behaviour became a worry, the family was supported to explore therapeutic input and funding for this to take place. This has led to the child receiving the appropriate support to promote their emotional well-being.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The staff know the children well and have forged good relationships. This helps the staff to be responsive and alert to children’s changing behaviours. The staff rarely use physical interventions to support children’s behaviour, preferring to use effective de-escalation techniques which are personalised for each child. The staff also work in partnership with children’s families and carers to ensure that they are supported with consistent routines and boundaries. This has helped children to be more settled when they are at home.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The head of boarding ensures that there is a collaborative approach to keeping children safe and will escalate any concerns to the relevant professionals. They advocate for the children and their families to ensure they have the support needed to maintain safe relationships when not at the residential provision. Any concerns are reported and responded to by the head of boarding and the wider safeguarding team to ensure that children are safeguarded. However, senior leaders lacked professional curiosity in one isolated example of safeguarding processes to ensure that records captured decision-making and reflection on how an allegation from a child was managed. Senior leaders reflected on this during the inspection and what learning there was from this to inform future practice.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Arrangements are in place as a contingency should any of the children need support for their health while staying at the residential school. However, there are shortfalls in the management of children’s medicine. For example, one child has not received their medication as prescribed, and a recording error had not been identified.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The head of boarding is invested in all of the children’s well-being and experiences, and this extends to when they leave. For example, he has continued input and support for one child for over a year since they left the home. This helped them to make a successful transition into a new school, ensuring effective liaison with this child’s new school to support them to settle.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

There is a small, consistent staff team to support the children. The head of boarding ensures the staff have regular supervision and annual appraisal. All of the staff have completed their mandatory training and have a suitable qualification for their role or are working towards this in the required timescale.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The head of boarding has well-established and effective systems to ensure he has oversight of the children’s care and day-to-day events. This includes regular monitoring of children’s records and quality assurance processes. Feedback from the children’s families and professional networks is positive and praises the communication between them and the staff and the ongoing support for the children. Inspection report for residential special school - The Caldecott School 4 The school has appointed a dedicated governor to have responsibility of the oversight of the residential provision. This has included visits to the home and an overview of safeguarding arrangements as well as spending time with the children. The residential school is a standing item at each of the governors’ meetings, and the head of boarding and headteacher provide an overview of the residential provision to inform the meetings.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Managers ensure that the necessary checks have been carried out as required for staff. However, the process for the appointment of governors and trustees is not included in the school’s policies, and there is a shortfall in the due diligence of these checks where information highlighted has raised issues worthy of being explored. Inspection report for residential special school - The Caldecott School 5

p.4

special schools

The school does not meet the following national minimum standards for residential special schools:

p.5

special schools

 All medication is safely and securely stored and accurate records are kept of its administration. Prescribed medicines are given only to the children to whom they are prescribed. Staff are suitably trained to administer a child’s medication as appropriate. Children allowed to self-medicate are assessed as sufficiently responsible to do so. Where applicable, schools have regard to statutory guidance. (Residential special schools: national minimum standards 12.8)  The school identifies at least one person other than a parent, outside the staff and those responsible for the leadership and governance of the school, who children may contact directly about personal problems or concerns at the school. This person may be known as the ‘independent person’. Children know who this person is, know how to contact them and feel comfortable talking to them. The person is easily accessible at all reasonable times, visits regularly (at least monthly), and

p.5

special schools

knows the children. The person should have the necessary skills to interact and communicate effectively with the children and be able to recognise good/poor care and safeguarding concerns. Children who cannot communicate verbally are given the means to request individual support. Schools may need to make a range of arrangements for independent support, which might be provided by more than one person, to ensure that the needs of each child are met. (Residential special schools: national minimum standards 17.2)

p.5

Points for improvement

 The school’s policy should be clear on what checks are carried out in relation to governors and trustees and what action is taken as a result of any concerns raised during these checks.  Senior leaders should ensure professional curiosity when considering the context of safeguarding concerns and ensure records demonstrate decision-making and action taken.

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school - The Caldecott School 6

p.5

Residential special school details

Social care unique reference number: 1276600

p.6

Residential special school details

Headteacher/teacher in charge: Stacey McShane

p.6

Residential special school details

Type of school: Residential Special School

p.6

Inspector

Sara Stoker, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential special school - The Caldecott School 7 and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion