Schools & FE · Ungraded school inspection
The Academy of Central Bedfordshire
Summary
Sara Boyce (lead), Suzanne Thrower
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 Dec 2024
- Inspectors verified
Sara Boyce, Suzanne Thrower
- Postcode verified
LU5 5PX
- Name on report verified
The Academy of Central Bedfordshire
- URN verified
139411
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In these cases, the work pupils are set is either not ambitious enough or pupils are not getting the precise help they need to secure key knowledge. p.2
- It lays out clearly what knowledge needs to be learned and in what order. p.2
- The school needs to ensure that effective pedagogical practice is shared so that all pupils access the same quality of provision and achieve well. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance7
“Leaders closely track how well pupils are achieving and engaging in learning.” p.2Teaching & assessment2
“The headteacher of this school is Paul Green.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,294
- about usual (typical 1282)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a school judged good for overall effectiveness before September 2024: The Academy of Central Bedfordshire Kingsland Campus, Parkside Drive, Houghton Regis, Bedfordshire LU5 5PX
p.1
Inspection dates: 10 and 11 December 2024
p.1
Outcome
The Academy of Central Bedfordshire has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at the previous inspection.
p.1
Outcome
The headteacher of this school is Paul Green. This school is a single academy trust, The Academy of Central Bedfordshire, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The headteacher is the chief executive officer. The trust is overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Stephen Gray.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils who attend this school have a range of special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and often a previously disrupted education. They benefit from either fixed-term or permanent placements, carefully matched to their requirements. Through the care and expertise of staff, pupils soon successfully re-engage with learning. Pupils are positive about their experience here and the tailored support. As a result, they are able to reintegrate back into mainstream school or secure a place at college or work.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils appreciate how staff support them academically to fill gaps in their knowledge. All pupils take GCSE qualifications in English and mathematics as well as other subjects. They also value the well-resourced vocational courses they can follow. This provides them with trade skills in, for example, catering, construction, vehicle maintenance, and hair and beauty.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff and pupils get on well. Pupils understand how they are expected to behave. They trust adults to help keep them safe. They access bespoke programmes to support their social and emotional needs. This rebuilds their independence and self-confidence. Pupils who need additional support to regulate are managed well. There are still occasions when pupils need reminders on how to behave. However, pupils respond well to earning ‘recognition points’ and going on reward trips, including a residential. 10 and 11 December 2024
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school ensures that pupils meet their placement targets. It gets to know pupils’ needs and interests from the outset. The school works effectively with parents and carers, commissioning schools and external professionals to set specific goals for each pupil. Pupils are then placed on appropriate academic and vocational qualification pathways. Leaders closely track how well pupils are achieving and engaging in learning. This means that any barriers to success are quickly identified and addressed. The school ensures that vocational subjects are of high quality and delivered by skilled staff.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has carefully designed its curriculum, so it can support pupils starting at different times in the year. It lays out clearly what knowledge needs to be learned and in what order. This means when a pupil starts, staff can spot gaps in pupils’ knowledge with precision. In most instances, lessons are adapted well to ensure that pupils have the opportunity to catch up on this missed learning. This is evident in reading, for example, where pupils are ably supported to develop fluency, widen their vocabulary and gain confidence reading out loud.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Pupils participate well in most lessons, especially when the staff have captured their imagination or interest. Most pupils’ work shows that they are engaging in their studies and achieving well. However, there are instances where this is not consistently the case. In these cases, the work pupils are set is either not ambitious enough or pupils are not getting the precise help they need to secure key knowledge.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Lessons are generally calm and orderly. Staff and pupils build positive relationships. Where any unwelcome behaviours do occur, the school takes appropriate action to resolve this. There has been a reduction in behaviour incidents due to staff consistently following the behaviour policy. Staff receive effective training on how to manage pupils’ social and emotional needs. Pupils know that any bullying or discriminatory behaviour is not tolerated.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Pupils are supported to overcome any anxieties about returning to school. Their attendance improves. Pupils like the several school dogs and the social areas that they can use to reset.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Pupils know how to stay safe and understand the dangers of crime. They are prepared for adulthood as they learn about managing money and careers. They learn about healthy lifestyles and relationships and how to show respect. Pupils know adults will listen and act on their concerns.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Staff find working here rewarding. They appreciate the support leaders provide them with when needed. Trustees know the school well. Many trustees represent the schools that use this provision. They have a vested interest in how well the school performs and so hold leaders accountable for its success. The trustees also seek and action external advice. They engage well with the local authority and fulfil their statutory safeguarding duties. 10 and 11 December 2024
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In some subjects, there are inconsistencies in how well subject content is taught. This means in these subjects some pupils are not gaining the knowledge the curriculum intends and a few pupils therefore disengage. The school needs to ensure that effective pedagogical practice is shared so that all pupils access the same quality of provision and achieve well. There are some instances where work set for pupils is not ambitious enough, especially when these pupils are ready to learn. This can limit how highly these pupils can achieve. The school needs to ensure that the high expectations it has for pupils are demonstrated in the work set for them so they fully achieve what they are capable of.
p.3
Background
Until September 2024, on a graded (section 5) inspection we gave schools an overall effectiveness grade, in addition to the key and provision judgements. Overall effectiveness grades given before September 2024 will continue to be visible on school inspection reports and on Ofsted's website. From September 2024 graded inspections will not include an overall effectiveness grade. This school was, before September 2024, judged to be good for its overall effectiveness.
p.3
Background
We have now inspected the school to determine whether it has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at that previous inspection. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school's work has improved significantly or that it may not be as strong as it was at the last inspection, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection. A graded inspection is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good for overall effectiveness in June 2015. 10 and 11 December 2024
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 10 and 11 December 2024
p.4
School details
Date of previous inspection 11 July 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
This school has been a single-academy trust since 2013. It is based across two sites. The Kingsland site is based at Parkside Drive, Houghton Regis, Bedfordshire LU5 5PX. The other site is based at Church Road, Stotfold SG5 4NE. The headteacher oversees both schools and is supported by a head of school at each site. The school provides some places for pupils on behalf of the local authority following a permanent exclusion. It is also commissioned by local schools to provide alternative provision for their pupils, usually on a fixed-term basis. Most pupils who attend this school have SEND, predominantly for social, emotional and mental health (SEMH) and/or autism. The school currently uses five other external alternative providers. 10 and 11 December 2024
p.5
6
The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the headteacher, both heads of school, assistant headteacher, senior teachers, special educational needs coordinator, subject leaders, teachers and support staff. The lead inspector met with nine trustees, including the chair of trustees. The lead inspector had a meeting with the director of education from the local authority. The lead inspector spoke to leaders from three commissioning schools who have had pupils attend this school. The inspectors focused inspection activity on the following groups of subjects: English mathematics, science; and catering and motor vehicle engineering. For each group of
p.6
Information about this inspection
subjects, the inspectors met with leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The inspectors also reviewed documentation provided by the school, including the school development plan, its self-evaluation document and trustee minutes. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the lead inspector reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interest first. Both inspectors spoke with several groups of pupils from all year groups and observed their behaviour in lessons and at lunchtime. The inspectors met with groups of staff and considered the opinions expressed through the staff survey. Inspectors took account of the views of parents expressed through Ofsted Parent View,
p.6
Information about this inspection
including free-text comments, and from talking to some parents on the telephone.
p.6
Inspection team
Sara Boyce, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Suzanne Thrower Ofsted Inspector 10 and 11 December 2024
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion