Schools & FE · Ungraded school inspection
Stanley Grove Primary Academy
Summary
Ian Shackleton (lead), Valmai Roberts
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Dec 2024
- Inspectors verified
Ian Shackleton, Valmai Roberts
- Postcode verified
M12 4NL
- Name on report verified
Stanley Grove Primary Academy
- URN verified
138785
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- As a result, pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) have the support or adaptations that they need to get the best out of their learning experiences. p.2
- For example, the curriculum, including the reading curriculum, clearly sets what pupils should learn and when. p.2
- The school should make sure that pupils have the support that they need to help them to develop into fluent, confident readers. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment3
“This helps teachers to ensure that pupils’ knowledge builds on secure foundations.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,326
- about usual (typical 1282)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a school judged good for overall effectiveness before September 2024: Stanley Grove Primary Academy Stanley Grove, Rushford Street, Longsight, Greater Manchester M12 4NL
p.1
Outcome
Stanley Grove Primary Academy has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at the previous inspection.
p.1
Outcome
The principal of this school is Amy Footman. This school is part of Bright Futures Educational Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), John Stephens and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Daniel Rubin.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school is very ambitious for the achievement of pupils. Pupils benefit from effective personal, social and emotional support. This contributes highly to how well pupils achieve.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school’s rights respecting ethos is at the heart of everything it does. Pupils are proud of their school, particularly the inclusive environment which is welcoming to all and nurtures pupils' individuality. There are strong relationships between pupils and staff. Pupils are polite and well mannered. They speak confidently and articulately with visitors.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Classroom environments are calm and purposeful. This allows pupils to do their best in lessons. The majority of pupils are curious and display positive attitudes towards their learning. They enjoy coming to school.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils have a very well-developed understanding of equality and diversity. They revel in their many responsibilities, including as members of the various departments of the school council. Pupils themselves help to shape the school’s wider offer. For example, they enjoy litter picking led by the school’s environment department. A wide variety of visits and extra-curricular activities enhance pupils’ learning across the curriculum. 3 and 4 December 2024
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Since the previous inspection, the school has taken action to maintain and further develop standards of education. These actions have been effective. For example, the curriculum, including the reading curriculum, clearly sets what pupils should learn and when. The school has also invested in carefully selected training opportunities for staff. This has supported improvements in the school’s drive for larger numbers of pupils to deepen their comprehension skills.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school’s ambitious curriculum develops pupils’ knowledge in logical steps as they move through the school from early years to Year 6. This learning prepares them well for the next stage of their education. The school has clearly identified the essential knowledge which it wants pupils to know across a range of subjects. Within lessons, teachers check on pupils’ knowledge of their previous learning. This helps teachers to ensure that pupils’ knowledge builds on secure foundations.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school is quick to identify pupils’ additional needs. It sets relevant and achievable academic targets for pupils with SEND. The school arranges additional guidance to ensure that these pupils receive the right support at the right time. As a result, pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) have the support or adaptations that they need to get the best out of their learning experiences.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
In the early years, staff share stories and nursery rhymes with children to develop their language and communication skills. This continues as the children move into Year 1. The school’s provisional published data in 2024 shows that the proportion of pupils who met the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check was below the national average. The school has taken swift and effective action to address this. For example, teachers are adept at identifying pupils who need additional support and provide this where it is most needed. As a result, current pupils’ learning of phonics is much more successful. That said, a few younger pupils still concentrate too much on understanding the sounds that different letters make. This means that they sometimes lose fluency when reading. It also affects how well they understand different texts.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Many pupils are new to learning English as an additional language. The school has provided these pupils, and other pupils who find reading tricky, with effective support so that they swiftly catch up with their peers. Older pupils enjoy a wide range of literature and class texts that are chosen to support various curriculum themes. Pupils enjoy reading. As a result, most pupils are developing into fluent and enthusiastic readers.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The provision for pupils’ wider development is a strength. The school has thought carefully about the qualities and values that it wants to instil into pupils. It ensures that pupils develop into respectful, caring and considerate individuals, ready for life beyond school and as global citizens of the future. The diverse nature of the community is welcomed and celebrated. The personal, social, health and economic education curriculum supports pupils from early years to Year 6, to develop an age-appropriate understanding of different relationships. 3 and 4 December 2024
p.2
3
The school is firm in its approach in making sure that pupils come to school as often as they can. It has clear strategies in place to support pupils’ attendance. The school works effectively with parents and carers to ensure regular attendance. As a result, many pupils attend regularly.
p.3
3
The trust and local governing body support and challenge the school in equal measure. They keep a close eye on pupils’ performance throughout the curriculum. The school supports staff’s workload. It engages well with staff when considering any changes or improvements. Staff are proud to work at the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
A small group of pupils do not have a secure recall of their phonics knowledge. On occasion, these pupils find it hard to read fluently. From time-to-time, this limits their understanding of what they have read. The school should make sure that pupils have the support that they need to help them to develop into fluent, confident readers.
p.3
Background
Until September 2024, on a graded (section 5) inspection we gave schools an overall effectiveness grade, in addition to the key and provision judgements. Overall effectiveness grades given before September 2024 will continue to be visible on school inspection reports and on Ofsted's website. From September 2024 graded inspections will not include an overall effectiveness grade. This school was, before September 2024, judged to be good for its overall effectiveness.
p.3
Background
We have now inspected the school to determine whether it has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at that previous inspection. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school's work has improved significantly or that it may not be as strong as it was at the last inspection, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection. A graded inspection is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good for overall effectiveness in July 2019. 3 and 4 December 2024
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 3 and 4 December 2024
p.4
School details
Date of previous inspection 3 and 4 July 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
Stanley Grove Primary Academy is a member of Bright Futures Educational Trust. The school uses one registered alternative provision for pupils. The school runs a breakfast club for pupils.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school's education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors spoke with the principal and other senior leaders. They spoke with leaders for some curriculum subjects, personal development, attendance and SEND. 3 and 4 December 2024
p.5
6
The lead inspector spoke with members of the multi-academy trust, the local governing body and the trust’s CEO and deputy CEO. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors; reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors visited a sample of lessons, looked at examples of pupils’ work and spoke with pupils about their learning. The lead inspector also observed some pupils from Years 1 to 3 read to a familiar adult. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons and around school. They also observed pupils while they played outside at playtime and lunchtime. Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments. They also met with parents before school.
p.6
6
Inspectors also considered the responses to Ofsted’s online survey for staff. There were no responses to Ofsted’s online survey for pupils.
p.6
Inspection team
Ian Shackleton, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Valmai Roberts Ofsted Inspector 3 and 4 December 2024
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion