Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Cantrell Primary and Nursery School

Inspected — · published 17 Jan 2025 · URN 122413

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Catherine Thornton (lead), Kirsty Norbury

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Catherine Thornton, Kirsty Norbury

  • Postcode verified

    NG6 9HJ

  • Name on report verified

    Cantrell Primary and Nursery School

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−2Mixedmore positive than 29% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveimprovingclearwell designedrobustknowledgeableproudenthusiastic
Criticismseriousweaknessesconcernsseriouslynot stronggapsnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings233w−67
  • What needs to improve766w+13

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
998
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 47
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
1%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 23%What needs to improve 77%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Deborah Weaver Headteacher Cantrell Primary and Nursery School Cantrell Road Bulwell Nottingham Nottinghamshire NG6 9HJ

p.1

School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 3 and 4 December 2024, on behalf of His Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in March 2024.

p.1

School

The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school's key and (where applicable) provision judgements, but to identify and report on the school's progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school's previous graded inspection.

p.1

School

During the inspection, Catherine Thornton, Ofsted Inspector (OI), Sylvie Newman, OI, and I discussed with you, other senior leaders, staff, governors and the local authority the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also visited lessons, looked at pupils’ work, met with pupils and scrutinised documents related to safeguarding, behaviour, attendance and special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

necessary for the school to no longer be judged as having serious weaknesses.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

The school should take further action to:  Ensure that the safeguarding culture is firmly embedded throughout the school.

p.1

designation

Since March 2024, there have been several changes in staffing. There is a new English leader and two new teachers. The school has appointed two teaching assistants and two sports coaches. There are new members of the governing body, including a new chair of the board of governors.

p.2

designation

While the school and governors share the same determination to improve the culture of safeguarding, the arrangements for safeguarding are not fully effective. The culture of safeguarding is not embedded fully throughout the school. A small minority of staff do not have a strong, shared understanding that safeguarding is everyone’s responsibility. However, the school has made significant improvements to ensure that all of the necessary recruitment checks are made before staff begin to work with pupils. The school’s approach to responding to concerns about pupils’ welfare is robust. Pupils have confidence that the school takes their concerns seriously. Governors and leaders have the knowledge and skills necessary to continue this journey of improvement.

p.2

designation

The school has made huge strides towards building a more coherent curriculum. Staff are knowledgeable and passionate about the subjects that they lead. The school has ensured that staff have the knowledge, skills and capacity to carry out their roles. While these improvements have started to make a difference, it is too soon to see the full impact on pupils’ outcomes. This is because the improvements to the curriculum are still in their infancy.

p.2

designation

The school has focused on improving staff morale. Communication systems are clear. Staff views have been listened to. Staff are now proud to work at the school. The staff team is united in its desire to succeed. Staff appreciate the care and consideration given to their workload and well-being. They feel valued and supported in their work.

p.2

designation

The school’s action plan sets out clear expectations for improving the quality of education. The school has rightly prioritised reading and writing. This started in earnest in September 2024 with the early reading curriculum. The school has a clear rationale for the introduction of a new phonics programme. Staff have been trained well and know how to implement this programme. They have access to a wealth of resources to support them in their teaching. This includes in-class support from a phonics specialist in the school. Although this is in its infancy, the positive impact is beginning to show in pupils’ work and in their positive attitudes to reading. Staff are enthusiastic about this new approach. The English curriculum is now well designed. The detailed knowledge that pupils must learn is clearly identified. Work in pupils’ books reflects their learning of the intended curriculum. However, this is still very new. Teachers check gaps in pupils’ knowledge and use this

p.2

designation

information to provide extra support for those who need it. The school has prioritised improving routines to promote a positive learning environment. This work has borne fruit. The school’s new behaviour policy has ensured that high behavioural expectations have been set. Staff follow the policy consistently. As a result, classrooms are typically calm so that pupils’ learning is not disturbed. Pupils behave sensibly during social times. They enjoy spending time with their friends. The sports coaches provide a wealth of exciting activities. Pupils queue up eagerly to participate in these activities.

p.2

designation

Pupils say that bullying is rare. They have confidence that the school will sort out any worries that they may have. Pupils speak with maturity and respect when discussing difference and diversity. They have a clear understanding and knowledge of fundamental British values. Pupils have beautiful manners. They hold doors open for others and greet visitors with a cheery smile.

p.3

designation

The school’s systems for the identification of pupils with SEND has strengthened. Leaders have a detailed oversight of pupils on the special educational needs register and use this information to inform training for staff. The school accesses external support from specialists to ensure that pupils receive the support they need. As a result of this refined provision, outcomes for pupils with SEND are improving.

p.3

designation

The school has embraced the extensive support provided by the local authority, the Nottingham Schools Trust and by external consultants. This support has influenced the many improvements made since the previous inspection.

p.3

designation

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of governors, the Department for Education's regional director and the director of children's services for Nottingham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion