Schools & FE · Ungraded school inspection
Christ Church CofE First School
Summary
Josie Leese (lead), Allyson Brown
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
26 Nov 2024
- Inspectors verified
Allyson Brown, Josie Leese
- Postcode verified
ST15 8EP
- Name on report verified
Christ Church CofE First School
- URN verified
142421
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school and trust should ensure that improvement strategies are routinely monitored and reported to governors and trustees. p.3
- As such, teachers do not focus on some of the most useful learning that pupils will need to remember for their future studies. p.3
- The school should ensure that this key knowledge is better defined in the curriculum so that teachers can further enhance pupils’ understanding. p.3
- Where this happens, the school does not have a sufficiently focused view on what is working well and what it needs to improve. p.2
- The school has not defined some of the essential knowledge that pupils need to know well enough in mathematics. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,390
- about usual (typical 1282)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a school judged good for overall effectiveness before September 2024: Christ Church CofE First School Northesk Street, Stone, Staffordshire ST15 8EP
p.1
Outcome
Christ Church CofE First School has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at the previous inspection.
p.1
Outcome
The headteacher of this school is Amy Graham. This school is part of Key Educational Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Chris Wright, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Gill Latos. The executive headteacher, Amy Graham, is responsible for this school and one other.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Christ Church First School is a nurturing, close-knit community. All pupils, including those that arrive at different points in the school year, are welcomed in and greeted warmly. Pupils arrive at school with smiles on their faces, happy to see their friends, staff and Rusty, the school dog.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils behave well. They look forward to their weekly ‘star assembly’ where they can earn awards for positive behaviour and are encouraged to be ‘the best that they can be’. Pupils also speak enthusiastically about their roles as worship leaders and playground buddies. Pupils are respectful of differences. They enjoy learning about people who may have different beliefs to their own. This learning is supported through well planned visits to different places of worship.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils look out for one another. Both pupils and staff are mindful of the needs of individuals. This helps pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), to feel valued and achieve well. Pupils say they feel safe and that adults are always on hand to help them with any problems they have. 26 November 2024
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Pupils gain a wide body of knowledge from the logically ordered and ambitious curriculum, which runs from the early years to Year 4. In wider curriculum subjects, pupils recall confidently the knowledge and skills they have learned. For example, in music, pupils used previously taught rhythm sections to create a performance piece. In most subjects, pupils progress through the curriculum well and teachers routinely check that pupils understand what has been taught.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Pupils benefit from a strong reading curriculum. Phonics begins as soon as pupils start school. Staff are skilled in the teaching of phonics and books are carefully matched to pupils’ abilities. For those pupils who need a little extra help, additional phonics sessions are in place. Pupils’ progress in reading is carefully checked to identify any gaps in their understanding. The school uses this information well to adapt teaching. This helps pupils to grow into confident and fluent readers. Developing a love of reading is a high priority for the school. Children in the early years enjoy sharing nursery rhymes and much-loved stories. Older pupils enjoy sharing books from the well-stocked and enticing library. Pupils further benefit from author visits, and some volunteer as ‘reading buddies’. These high expectations for academic success mean all pupils, including those with SEND, achieve well in reading.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The mathematics curriculum is at an earlier stage of development than other subjects. There are gaps in pupils’ prior knowledge. This is because the school has not considered carefully enough some of the key learning that it wants pupils to know. The school is working to resolve this. Nonetheless, pupils find it difficult to recall their previous learning in mathematics, which makes it hard for them to build new knowledge on previous learning. In addition, the school does not always check closely enough on how well pupils are learning. Where this happens, the school does not have a sufficiently focused view on what is working well and what it needs to improve.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school is highly inclusive in its approach to supporting pupils with SEND. Their needs are quickly identified, and the school draws on external advice to best meet them. Staff collaborate effectively to make sure pupils’ needs are met. This enables pupils with SEND to learn the curriculum well.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school’s work to maintain regular attendance is detailed and thorough. Pupils and many families feel well supported by the provision that the school puts in place to help them. This work means attendance rates remain positive.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school offers a broad and interesting range of experiences to support pupils’ personal development. Online safety is regularly taught in school and reinforced in assemblies. Pupils develop their interests and talents through accessing a wide range of activities, from Kung Fu to cookery. They have the opportunity to contribute to the wider community and enjoy performing for the public at local venues. Pupils have a clear understanding of diversity and fundamental British values and how these relate to their own lives. This prepares them well for life in modern Britain. 26 November 2024
p.2
3
Governors have a wide range of skills and experience to support them to carry out their roles. They have a strong understanding of some of the aspects of the school’s provision. However, in a few areas they have not challenged the school’s evaluations robustly enough. This means that they do not fully understand the impact of the school’s actions to improve.
p.3
3
The school and the trustees prioritise staff well-being. They are mindful of staff workload and provide appropriate support, such as giving time to undertake specific tasks. Staff are proud to work at this school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school does not always accurately and robustly check on the impact of its improvement strategies. This means it lacks clarity about what is working well and when additional intervention is required. This sometimes slows the pace of improvement. The school and trust should ensure that improvement strategies are routinely monitored and reported to governors and trustees. The school has not defined some of the essential knowledge that pupils need to know well enough in mathematics. As such, teachers do not focus on some of the most useful learning that pupils will need to remember for their future studies. The school should ensure that this key knowledge is better defined in the curriculum so that teachers can further enhance pupils’ understanding.
p.3
Background
Until September 2024, on a graded (section 5) inspection we gave schools an overall effectiveness grade, in addition to the key and provision judgements. Overall effectiveness grades given before September 2024 will continue to be visible on school inspection reports and on Ofsted’s website. From September 2024 graded inspections will not include an overall effectiveness grade. This school was, before September 2024, judged good for its overall effectiveness.
p.3
Background
We have now inspected the school to determine whether it has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at that previous inspection. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school’s work has improved significantly or that it may not be as strong as it was at the last inspection, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection. A graded inspection is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, 26 November 2024
p.3
4
behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.4
4
This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good for overall effectiveness in March 2019.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 26 November 2024
p.4
School details
Website www.christchurch-stone.staffs.sch.uk
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 27 February 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
Christ Church CofE First School joined The Key Educational Trust in April 2016. The school does not use any providers of alternative provision. As a Church of England school, this school is subject to inspections under section 48 of the Education Act 2005. The school was inspected in June 2019.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 26 November 2024
p.5
6
During the inspection, the lead inspector met with the headteacher and the assistant headteacher. They met with the CEO and other leaders from the trust. They also met with members of the local governing body. The inspectors focused inspection activity on the following groups of subjects: early English and mathematics, and science, French and music. For each group of subjects, the inspector visited a sample of lessons, spoke with pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interest first. Throughout the inspection, the lead inspector met with groups of staff. There were no responses to the online staff survey.
p.6
6
The lead inspector met some parents at the beginning of the day and had regard to the views expressed through Ofsted Parent View. There were 35 responses to the online survey for parents.
p.6
Inspection team
Josie Leese, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Allyson Brown Ofsted Inspector 26 November 2024
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion