Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Battle Primary Academy
Summary
Andy Yeoman (lead), Martin Dyer
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
20 Nov 2024
- Inspectors verified
Andy Yeoman, Martin Dyer
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Outstanding
- Early years verified
Outstanding
- Leadership and management verified
Outstanding
- Personal development verified
Outstanding
- Quality of education verified
Outstanding
- Postcode verified
RG30 2TD
- Name on report verified
Battle Primary Academy
- URN verified
139066
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- Behaviour and attitudesOutstanding
- Early yearsOutstanding
- Leadership and managementOutstanding
- Personal developmentOutstanding
- Quality of educationOutstanding
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance3
“Leaders at all levels have a clear vision for the school.” p.2Teaching & assessment2
“High-quality teaching of phonics underpins the school’s early reading strategy.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 969
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 58, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Battle Primary Academy Cranbury Road, Reading, Berkshire RG30 2TD
p.1
Inspection dates: 19 and 20 November 2024
p.1
The quality of education Outstanding Behaviour and attitudes Outstanding Personal development Outstanding Leadership and management Outstanding Early years provision Outstanding Previous inspection grade Good
p.1
The principal of this school is Louise Burridge. This school is part of The Thames Learning Trust multi-academy trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Richard Kearsey, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Jon Reekie. 19 and 20 November 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
This is a school that has improved rapidly and continues to do so. Pupils know this. They talk positively about the new things they learn and the new things they do. They know that their teachers expect a lot and are keen to impress in all they do. Their progress through the school’s curriculum is strong.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are not afraid to make mistakes. One telling conversation with a pupil revealed that she feels that staff give her friends ‘the confidence to succeed’. Pupils are proud of their work, even when it is not quite perfect ‘but nearly’. They know that staff are there to help when learning gets tough. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are also supported well. Because of this, levels of trust are high, and all pupils engage in learning well.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ attitudes to school are highly positive. They feel that their school is a friendly place. They frown on poor behaviour, though acknowledge this is relatively rare. They feel safe here. The levels of attendance of all pupils are high. Children in early years are equally well provided for. In Nursery and Reception, high expectations go hand in hand with a deep understanding of the wider needs of each individual child.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Much has changed here in a relatively short period of time. Staff and pupils alike demonstrate boundless energy and great pride in their school. Relationships in classrooms are exceedingly productive. Teachers teach. Pupils learn. There is no time to waste and everyone knows it.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Leaders at all levels have a clear vision for the school. This starts at the top with trustees and executive officers from the multi-academy trust. Plans to improve the school are focused. Expectations for success are high. Pupils come first, though the workload and well-being of staff also have an appropriately high priority.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Classroom visits show that there is a consistent approach to how the curriculum is delivered across all phases of the school. Staff benefit from a focused and well-planned cycle of internal training. External consultants are also used to enhance the knowledge and expertise of staff. Consequently, pupils experience a high-quality education, no matter what their backgrounds or barriers to learning might be.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The curriculum is well thought out. It starts in the early years foundation stage, where children progress well through the curriculum. The very high proportion of pupils with English as an additional language are supported well from the start. The school’s programme to teach pupils to read also starts here. High-quality teaching of phonics underpins the school’s early reading strategy. A relentless focus on ensuring that pupils can read confidently forms the foundation of learning across early years and into Years 1 and 2. Those who struggle to read are supported well by expert staff. The impact of this is clear to see on pupils, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds. 19 and 20 November 2024
p.2
3
Though mathematics and English have a high importance here, the wider curriculum adds great strength to the quality of education the school provides. Sport and the arts have a high profile. Pupils relish their work as historians. Older pupils enjoy their visits to local secondary schools, where they benefit from additional challenges as scientists or as budding computer technicians.
p.3
3
The school’s programme to develop pupils’ wider interests is noteworthy. High-quality enrichment activities are the norm. They come in many forms, including educational visits and taking part in competitions. These include singing in the glee club at Wembley or as aspiring Olympian rowers. Trips to the beach are equally popular. Pupils remember much about what they learned on their trips to the Science and Natural History Museums.
p.3
3
This is an inclusive school that celebrates its multi-cultural community. Pupils learn about life in modern Britain while honouring the diverse ethnic backgrounds others come from. Older pupils also have a growing understanding of equality and difference. As a result, they are well prepared for their next phase of education.
p.3
3
This is truly a school that sits at the heart of the community it serves. The large majority of parents and carers who talked to inspectors or completed Ofsted Parent View are positive about what the school provides. Pupils thrive here. They enjoy their learning in and outside of the classroom. They know that hard work leads to success. They are motivated to be the best they can be because staff care, and the school really does strive for excellence for all.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.3
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.3
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, 19 and 20 November 2024
p.3
4
looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 19 and 20 November 2024
p.4
School details
Dates of previous inspection 30 April and 1 May 2019
p.5
Information about this school
Since the last inspection, the school has joined The Thames Learning Trust as a sponsor-led academy. A new principal has joined the school since the last inspection. The school does not currently use alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 19 and 20 November 2024
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors held a wide range of meetings with leaders at all levels, as well as teaching and support staff. The lead inspector held two separate meetings with executive officers and trustees of the multi-academy trust. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, history and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects with leaders. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central
p.6
6
record; took account of the views of parents, leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Pupils were talked to throughout the inspection to gain their views about the school. Inspectors also talked formally to two representative groups of pupils. Inspectors considered the views of parents submitted through Ofsted Parent View. An inspector talked to parents at the start of the first day of the inspection. The views of staff were also considered through Ofsted’s staff survey.
p.6
Inspection team
Clive Close, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Martin Dyer Ofsted Inspector 19 and 20 November 2024
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion