Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Leasowes High School

Inspected 4 Dec 2024 · published 15 Jan 2025 · URN 143582

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Neil Warner (lead), Jo Evans, Nicola Walters, Trudi Young

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Dec 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Jo Evans, Neil Warner, Nicola Walters, Trudi Young

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    B62 8PJ

  • Name on report verified

    Leasowes High School

  • URN verified

    143582

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh-qualityambitiouseffectiveproudpositiveenjoyextremelyvery high
Criticismgapsweaknessestoo lownot consistentlystrugglenot effectivelynot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1020w+46
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,001
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Inspection of Leasowes High School Kent Road, Halesowen, West Midlands B62 8PJ

p.1

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Good

p.1

The headteacher of this school is Christiana Papadopoullos. This school is part of Invictus Education Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Edward Vitalis, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Jessica Shulman. 3 and 4 December 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are justifiably proud to belong to Leasowes High School. The school’s motto of ‘every day, in every way, our students come first’ permeates through school life. Whether this is by providing an ambitious and broad curriculum, offering many opportunities to learn beyond the classroom or keeping pupils safe, the ‘Leasowes Learner’ is placed at the heart.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school is calm and purposeful. There are extremely effective relationships between staff and pupils. Pupils demonstrate very positive attitudes towards people from backgrounds different to their own and state that ‘you can be different at Leasowes’. Pupils have positive attitudes to their studies. They act maturely around school, including at social times. Pupils enjoy coming to school. All pupils speak highly of the pastoral support and care they receive.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has very high expectations for pupils’ behaviour. Pupils respond well to these and understand what it means to be a ‘Leasowes Learner’. Pupils report high levels of confidence in staff dealing with any issues that may arise. They are proud to be part of the school and embrace the varied opportunities to develop their skills and character, such as theatre visits, Duke of Edinburgh’s Award expeditions and school productions.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school’s improvement journey has gained momentum over the past eighteen months. Leaders and staff are relentless in their desire to provide pupils with the best possible education. Trustees, local academy council members and senior leaders all understand the school’s strengths and weaknesses. The school works closely with trust colleagues to address improvement priorities. Staff, pupils, parents and carers describe a school which is calm and purposeful, with a curriculum that now meets the needs of all pupils.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

In 2023, outcomes at the end of Year 11 were too low. With the support of the trust, the school has recently reviewed its curriculum to raise the level of ambition for pupils and improve standards. The curriculum now clearly identifies the key knowledge that pupils need to know, as well as the order in which they need to learn it.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Staff present subject matter clearly. Teachers ensure that learning activities build on pupils’ previous learning and use checks of pupils’ learning well to identify gaps or misconceptions. This enables staff to refine their teaching so that pupils make good progress through the curriculum. For example, careful explanations and selections of tasks support pupils to make high-quality masks in art. However, this is not consistent across all subjects. On some occasions, pupils’ understanding is not checked effectively. At these times, some pupils find it harder to learn the new curriculum as gaps in their knowledge or misconceptions remain.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) have their needs accurately identified. Pupils with SEND are well supported and follow the same ambitious curriculum as their peers. There are clear procedures to identify pupils’ needs. Teachers 3 and 4 December 2024

p.2

3

know pupils well. However, at times, teachers do not consistently use the available information about pupils’ SEND to adapt their delivery of the curriculum effectively. As a result, pupils with SEND sometimes struggle with the tasks set and do not achieve as well as they should.

p.3

3

The school’s approach to helping pupils at the early stages of reading is effective. Pupils who have gaps in their reading knowledge are swiftly identified and receive targeted support to help them to read confidently and fluently. In addition, the school ensures reading is given a high profile. The school ensures that pupils have frequent opportunities to enjoy high-quality texts during form time.

p.3

3

The school’s personal development programme is well planned and thorough. Pupils learn about pertinent themes such as healthy relationships and online safety. They also learn about tolerance and respecting those who are different from themselves. Pupils also benefit from high-quality careers guidance, support and advice. Staff ensure that these opportunities for meaningful encounters with the world of work are accessible to all pupils.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some teachers do not check pupils’ understanding of key knowledge carefully enough. This means that, sometimes, gaps in pupils’ learning are not identified quickly enough. As a result, some pupils do not progress through the curriculum as securely as they should. The school should ensure that teachers check pupils’ understanding systematically so that any gaps in knowledge can be resolved quickly.  Sometimes, the school does not ensure that learning activities for pupils with SEND are adapted sufficiently to meet their needs. This means that, on occasion, pupils with SEND do not make the progress that they should in their learning of subject curriculums. The school should ensure that staff’s support for learning activities for pupils with SEND matches the ambition of its curriculum so that pupils build their knowledge well over time.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 3 and 4 December 2024

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with SEND; pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked-after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 3 and 4 December 2024

p.4

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,060

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 24 and 25 September 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of Invictus Academies Trust.  The school uses two registered alternative providers.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth-form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 3 and 4 December 2024

p.5

6

Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.

p.6

6

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The lead inspector met with the CEO of the trust, trustees and members of the local academy council.  Inspectors met with senior leaders, the special educational needs coordinator, curriculum leaders, teachers and pupils.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, science, religious education, design and technology and physical education and geography. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered

p.6

6

the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons, around school and at social times. They considered pupils’ views about behaviour and bullying in school. They also spoke with staff about their workload and well-being and about pupils’ behaviour.

p.6

Inspection team

Neil Warner, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Jo Evans Ofsted Inspector 3 and 4 December 2024

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked-after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion