Schools & FE · Ungraded school inspection
Temple Normanton Primary Academy
Summary
Shaheen Hussain (lead), Michael Wilson
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
26 Nov 2024
- Inspectors verified
Michael Wilson, Shaheen Hussain
- Postcode verified
S42 5DW
- Name on report verified
Temple Normanton Junior Academy
- URN verified
144344
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, during independent learning, interactions and communication between adults and children are not as rich or ambitious as they should be. p.2
- They sometimes do not explain things as well as they should, leaving pupils with gaps in their knowledge. p.2
- The school must ensure that all staff have the knowledge and expertise they need to deliver the curriculum in each subject as intended. p.3
- ‘Yellow bricks’ are used to highlight the key words that pupils need to use and recall. p.2
- The school should ensure that all staff in the early years have the necessary skills and expertise to develop children’s communication and language when children learn independently. p.3
- The school, alongside the trust, has ensured that the curriculum in each subject clearly identifies the key knowledge that pupils need to know and learn. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance3
“Governors and trustees know the school well.” p.3Parents & families3
“Most parents and carers praise the school’s work.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,313
- about usual (typical 1282)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a school judged good for overall effectiveness before September 2024: Temple Normanton Junior Academy Elm Street, Temple Normanton, Chesterfield, Derbyshire S42 5DW
p.1
Outcome
Temple Normanton Junior Academy has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at the previous inspection.
p.1
Outcome
The principal of this school is Leica Carter. This school is part of Aston Community Education Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Rebecca Scutt, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by John Barton.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
At Temple Normanton Junior Academy, pupils are caring, polite, curious and respectful. They learn to conduct themselves in a calm and measured way. They told inspectors that they feel happy and safe in school because staff look after them. In this small village school, pupils of all ages play and study together in harmony. They enjoy learning. However, occasionally, pupils do not learn the school’s curriculum as well as they could.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils relish the different roles and responsibilities they have in school. ‘Mini-leaders’ coordinate activities at lunchtime with pride. They encourage their peers to follow the rules of the playground games and urge them ‘to be the best’. Other pupils help their peers to understand online safety and learn how to look after the environment.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Children in the early years quickly learn the school’s routines, such as how to share and use resources appropriately. However, interactions with staff during independent learning do not always help children improve their communication and language. Pupils in Year 6 appreciate visits to local secondary schools in readiness for their transition to key stage 3. These visits help them to understand the changes and the new environment they will move to. 26 November 2024
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school, alongside the trust, has ensured that the curriculum in each subject clearly identifies the key knowledge that pupils need to know and learn. Pupils in mixed-age classes learn a curriculum that is well matched to their stage of development.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Staff appreciate the training and support they get to deliver the curriculum and develop their expertise. Some of these curriculum changes have had a positive impact on staff’s workload. However, in some subjects, teachers’ knowledge is not developed fully. They sometimes do not explain things as well as they should, leaving pupils with gaps in their knowledge.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
There is a strong focus on securing pupils’ learning of the basics, including learning to read. Staff ensure that pupils rehearse this knowledge often. Pupils who need extra help to keep up with the school’s early reading programme receive prompt support. Staff use timely checks to ensure that pupils are at the right stage of the reading curriculum. As a result, pupils become increasingly confident in reading unfamiliar words using the techniques they have learned.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Disadvantaged pupils, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), develop the confidence and resilience to overcome any challenges to learning that they may face. Teachers usually adapt learning well for these pupils. They rephrase instructions and repeat key language so that pupils with SEND can learn alongside their peers.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Vocabulary is prioritised in the school’s curriculum. ‘Yellow bricks’ are used to highlight the key words that pupils need to use and recall. Teachers often revisit these words to check pupils’ understanding. In the early years, children learn to repeat key vocabulary and listen carefully to instructions. They practise recognising how many objects are in a small group without counting and enjoy listening to stories. However, during independent learning, interactions and communication between adults and children are not as rich or ambitious as they should be. This limits how well some children develop their early language.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Most parents and carers praise the school’s work. They recognise the progress their children have made. They appreciate the strong relationship that the school nurtures between home and school. Parents understand the school’s expectations for attendance and punctuality. Over time, this has had a positive impact, particularly for the most disadvantaged pupils in school.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school’s provision for personal development is well considered. The books pupils read help them to understand different communities. This encourages them to develop empathy, compassion and respect for diversity in modern Britain. Pupils have an age- appropriate understanding of healthy relationships and know what it means to be a good friend. They know how to keep themselves physically and mentally healthy, and how to stay safe online and in the wider community. 26 November 2024
p.2
3
Governors and trustees know the school well. They provide robust challenge and support. They assure themselves of the quality of education that the school provides and the improvements needed. The school has an accurate understanding of its next steps. It is addressing these priorities methodically to ensure that these changes are sustainable.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In some subjects, staff do not have the necessary expertise to deliver the curriculum as intended. The explanations they give to pupils are not always clear enough. They sometimes teach pupils misconceptions. As a result, pupils do not learn as well as they could in these subjects. The school must ensure that all staff have the knowledge and expertise they need to deliver the curriculum in each subject as intended. During independent learning activities in the early years, interactions and communication between adults and children are not consistently rich, ambitious and meaningful. This does not help children to close gaps in early communication and language. The school should ensure that all staff in the early years have the necessary skills and expertise to develop children’s communication and language when children learn independently.
p.3
Background
Until September 2024, on a graded (section 5) inspection we gave schools an overall effectiveness grade, in addition to the key and provision judgements. Overall effectiveness grades given before September 2024 will continue to be visible on school inspection reports and on Ofsted’s website. From September 2024 graded inspections will not include an overall effectiveness grade. This school was, before September 2024, judged to be good for its overall effectiveness.
p.3
Background
We have now inspected the school to determine whether it has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at that previous inspection. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school’s work has improved significantly or that it may not be as strong as it was at the last inspection, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection. A graded inspection is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately. 26 November 2024
p.3
4
This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good for overall effectiveness in February 2020.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 26 November 2024
p.4
School details
Dates of previous inspection 4 and 5 February 2020, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of Aston Community Education Trust. The school does not use any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. 26 November 2024
p.5
6
Inspectors met with senior leaders, subject leaders, teaching and support staff. Inspectors considered the school’s curriculum, particularly for early reading, English, mathematics, computing, geography and science. They visited lessons, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector also met the trust’s executive principal and the CEO, as well as representatives of the board of trustees and the local governing body. Inspectors considered the school’s personal development programme. Inspectors reviewed the school’s behaviour and attendance records. Inspectors also spoke to pupils to gather general information about school life. A range of documents was scrutinised, including plans to improve the school. Inspectors spoke to parents and staff during the inspection. They considered the responses to Ofsted’s surveys.
p.6
Inspection team
Shaheen Hussain, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Michael Wilson Ofsted Inspector 26 November 2024
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion