Schools & FE · School monitoring visit
a school not in a category of concern of Millbrook School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Sara Boyce
- Postcode verified
EN8 9BX
- Name on report verified
a school not in a category of concern of Millbrook School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Provide staff with tailored support on how to adapt teaching to successfully fill specific gaps in pupils’ knowledge within their class. p.1
- Ensure that the work set for all pupils is well matched to needs, especially for pupils with English as an additional language. p.1
- Check that pupils are learning the new curriculum content in the detail intended and are secure in this knowledge before learning something new. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development2
“Staff are benefiting from this joint professional development.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 807
- shorter than usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Jespy Pereira-Barker Head of School Millbrook School Gews Corner Cheshunt Waltham Cross Hertfordshire EN8 9BX
p.1
School
This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 26 November 2024, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school meets the monitoring threshold as set out in the Monitoring Inspection Handbook .
p.1
School
The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s key and (where applicable) provision judgements, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.
p.1
School
During the inspection, I discussed with you and the executive headteacher, other senior leaders, governors and the local authority the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also carried out visits to lessons across the school, met with staff, spoke to pupils, looked at pupils’ work and reviewed safeguarding documentation. I looked at the latest governor minutes, the school’s development plan and notes of visits from the local authority. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.
p.1
Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but some aspects of the
The school should take further action to: Provide staff with tailored support on how to adapt teaching to successfully fill specific gaps in pupils’ knowledge within their class. Ensure that the work set for all pupils is well matched to needs, especially for pupils with English as an additional language. Check that pupils are learning the new curriculum content in the detail intended and are secure in this knowledge before learning something new.
p.1
Main findings
Since the last inspection, the school has joined a federation with another local school. There is now an executive headteacher who is also responsible for this school, along with yourself as head of school. The federation is overseen by one newly formed joint governing board. As a federation, you are taking the right actions to improve the quality of education at this school. You have also secured a stable staff team, which is supportive of the improvements being made and keen to do well.
p.2
Main findings
The school has ensured that there are now suitable adaptations in place for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) to access the curriculum. It has acted quickly to ensure that staff know the recently updated curriculum expectations. Leaders, however, recognise that these changes are still in their infancy. This means that staff are still getting used to the new curriculum detail and how to check that pupils can recall this. Staff have also received guidance on the most successful ways to fill gaps in pupils’ knowledge. There are early signs of this having a positive impact on pupils’ achievement, especially in mathematics and reading. However, there are still occasions where teaching is still not being sufficiently adapted for the specific needs within the class. Therefore, missed opportunities remain to secure or extend pupils’ knowledge. This includes in writing. Leaders accept they need to provide further bespoke support to address this, yet
p.2
Main findings
in a way that is also manageable for staff. This includes how best to support the increasing number of pupils attending the school who arrive speaking little or no English.
p.2
Main findings
The newly formed federation’s governing board is ambitious for the school. Governors have quickly established systems and processes to ensure that they fulfil their statutory duties and hold leaders to account. They have the required knowledge to provide challenge and support. Governors have enabled an effective sharing of staff expertise and resources from within the federation. Staff are benefiting from this joint professional development. Staff also know that their views on well-being are listened to during this period of change. The federation is still in its early stages. However, it has already strengthened the leadership capacity and strategic oversight of the school.
p.2
Main findings
Pupils continue to behave well. They have trust in adults to help them. The school provides them with the knowledge to stay safe. Pupils like the new topics they are learning about and the recent curriculum changes.
p.2
Main findings
You and other leaders appreciate the guidance from the local authority. You have found it supportive when setting up the federation and in providing necessary resources. Staff have found the training and advice offered by the local authority advisers about the curriculum to have benefited their practice. Governors also value the external challenge the local authority provides.
p.2
Main findings
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of governors, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Hertfordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion