Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Gemini Preparatory School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Pollendine, Dawn Jeanette
- Group reference verified
RP512183
- Inspection date verified
7 Nov 2024
- Inspectors verified
Val Taylor
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
HU11 5BW
- Name on report verified
Gemini Preparatory School
- URN verified
314635
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Supervision of the children is not always effective. p.2
- For instance, there are weaknesses in supervision of children, staff deployment and the organisation of the premises and equipment to meet all the children's needs. p.2
- Staff focus on tasks and fail to prioritise close supervision when young children are eating. p.2
- This means that children's safety is compromised. p.2
- Staff often focus on other tasks in the room and fail to closely supervise babies and those with SEND when they are eating. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development4
“Supervision of the children is not always effective.” p.2Communication & language4
“They talk about good links with local schools to support effective transitions.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 776
- shorter than usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Gemini Preparatory School Old School Lane, Rise, HULL HU11 5BW
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Children's safety is not maintained and there are inconsistencies in how staff support children's ongoing learning and development. This has a direct impact on the quality of care and education children receive. For instance, there are weaknesses in supervision of children, staff deployment and the organisation of the premises and equipment to meet all the children's needs.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Staff focus on tasks and fail to prioritise close supervision when young children are eating. This means that children's safety is compromised. Routines are not organised to support staff to be able to consistently focus on quality interactions with all children. The premises and resource are not planned to ensure they are fit for purpose and suitable for all the developmental ages of children being cared for. Consequently, staff are unable to consistently provide babies and children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) with quality play and learning experiences.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Despite these weaknesses, children are generally happy and enjoy coming to the nursery. Babies are content and older children are confident and keen to learn. Through some positive interactions that take place, children are acknowledged, and some learning takes place. Children make friends and enjoy leading their own play.
p.2
need to do better?
n Supervision of the children is not always effective. For example, children eat in their highchairs with no staff in the room. Staff often focus on other tasks in the room and fail to closely supervise babies and those with SEND when they are eating. This means children are at risk of choking. These practices compromise children's safety. n Space, resources, and staffing are not effectively organised to meet all children's needs or promote their positive attitudes to learning. For example, the baby area is also used as a book area for the older children. When staff share a book with the older children, children are distracted by the baby toys around them. The space designated for babies is not consistently used and when it is used, staff do not spend enough quality time with the babies. This results in babies being content but provided with very few stimulating learning opportunities. n When staff are deployed effectively, they provide some quality interactions with
p.2
need to do better?
the older children. For example, children move to music and staff encourage them to hold out their arms so they can balance. Older children confidently use the balance bikes outside. Children giggle as they try and squirt water into the sand tray. Staff encourage them to squeeze the plastic bottles harder to make holes in the sand. Staff explain this will develop strength in their fingers to support early writing skills.
p.2
need to do better?
7 November 2024 n Staff sometimes carry out various other tasks as part of the routine and management do not ensure staff remain effectively deployed. For example, when staff have time to engage with SEND children, interactions are positive and in line with children's individual support plans. However, when staff are busy with other children or with routines, SEND children do not benefit from quality engagement and support. n Staff monitor children's learning through assessment and identify they need opportunities to recognise shape and colour. They then plan experiences for older children to use creative materials to design rockets. Staff talk with the children about the shapes they can use to design a rocket. Children feel the paint with their fingers and enjoy mixing colours together. Staff encourage older children to recall their experiences from Bonfire Night. Children talk about feeling hot and cold next to the bonfire.
p.2
need to do better?
n Children have opportunities to grow fruit and vegetables in the garden during the year. They are supported to learn about how foods grow and enjoy eating what they have grown. As staff sit and engage with older children, they encourage them to share what they have eaten for their breakfast. For example, they talk about brioche that does not need cooking because it is out of the cupboard. n Staff provide opportunities for children to go out for walks and to experience nature around them. They collect branches and twigs to make a den in the garden. n Parents confirm they look forward to photographs shared with them and they know where their children are developmentally. They talk about good links with local schools to support effective transitions.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
ensure children are fully supervised while eating 08/11/2024
p.3
Due date
7 November 2024 ensure staff are deployed effectively so that all children, specifically babies and children with SEND, receive consistent quality interactions to support learning 22/11/2024
p.3
Due date
ensure space and resources are consistently organised and used to meet children's needs. 22/11/2024
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 314635 Local authority East Riding of Yorkshire Inspection number 10364191 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 12 Number of children on roll 15 Name of registered person Pollendine, Dawn Jeanette
p.5
reference number
Telephone number 01964 564194 Date of previous inspection 30 January 2019
p.5
Information about this early years setting
Gemini Preparatory School registered in 1993. The pre-school employs three members of childcare staff, all of whom hold early years qualifications at level 3 or above. The pre-school opens from Monday to Friday for 43 weeks of the year. Sessions are from 9am until 3pm. The provider offers the government funded places for childcare and receives specific funding for disadvantaged children.
p.5
Inspection activities
n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. She discussed with the manager how they organise their early years provision, including the aims and rationale for their early years foundation stage curriculum. n The inspector talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspector spoke with management about the leadership and management of the setting. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspector carried out a joint observation of a group activity with the manager. n The inspector spoke to several parents during the inspection and took account of their views. n The manager showed the inspector documentation to demonstrate the suitability of staff.
p.6
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Inspection activities
7 November 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion