Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Monton Village School Ltd
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
3 Jan 2025
- URN verified
EY284857
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 368
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 34, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 11 November 2024, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements. On 12 November 2024, the provider notified us about Safeguarding policies and procedures, Suitable people and Safeguarding training. The notification means that the provider met their legal responsibility as set out in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage to notify Ofsted of any significant event which is likely to affect the suitability of any person who cares for/is in regular contact with children on the premises.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 2 January 2025, we carried out a telephone call. We found the provider had safeguarding policies and procedures in place and are in line with the local safeguarding procedures. We also found that the vetting procedures to check the suitability of staff is effective. The provider ensures that risk assessments are implemented effectively to inform staff practice.
p.1
Summary of outcome
However, we found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements and had taken action to put matters right. The provider has reflected on their understanding of and responsibility to implement the safeguarding policy, such as to report any concerns they may have about staff and to do this in a timely manner. Staff have been fully re-inducted and provided with repeat training in safeguarding to ensure they now fully understand their roles and responsibilities to safeguard children. Additionally, staff have attended meetings to ensure they understand their ongoing training, with particular regard to manual handling and appropriate touch policies. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements. We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion