Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Kintbury Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Kintbury Pre-School Playgroup Committee
- Group reference verified
RP526862
- Inspection date verified
20 Nov 2024
- Inspectors verified
Melissa Cox
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
RG17 9XN
- Name on report verified
Kintbury Pre-School
- URN verified
EY349727
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The lack of effective oversight by the provider has led to weakness in the quality of the provision. p.2
- However, the lack of effective leadership and management for staff means that sessions are not adequately planned and, overall, fail to meet all the needs of the children attending. p.2
- However, the poor quality of teaching and the lack of a well-designed curriculum affects children's overall enjoyment. p.2
- are limited to a supervisory role only and the lack of planning undermines any value children gain from opportunities to develop their physical skills. p.3
- However, weakness in how staff assess children's progress and plan for this, means parents do not get an accurate picture of children's learning overall. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language3
“Children's emerging language and communication is suitably supported.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 953
- about usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Kintbury Pre-School Preston Hall, Gainsborough Avenue, Kintbury, Berkshire RG17 9XN
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Since the last inspection, the provider has experienced a period of organisational change, including challenges that have affected staffing arrangements. In recent months this has become more stable. However, the effectiveness of the changes has not been monitored well. Breaches in requirements have not been identified or acted on. The procedures for assuring the suitability of adults who work with children are not robustly followed. The provider fails to ensure that staff have a suitable understanding of all safeguarding policies. This has an impact on children's welfare. Ofsted has not been informed of changes to the committee, as required, so that suitability checks can be carried out. The provider does not monitor staff's performance, including how staff support children's learning.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Despite these weaknesses, staff develop caring relationships with children. They offer children reassurance when needed, including those who are new to the setting. Staff provide suitable levels of support for children's developing independence, such as helping children to prepare snack for their friends. Children select toys from the boxes put out each day and benefit from familiar activities, such as daily song and story times. They behave well and play happily alongside their friends. However, the poor quality of teaching and the lack of a well-designed curriculum affects children's overall enjoyment. Consequently, children do not sustain their concentration at activities or learn to persevere when they encounter challenges in their play. Overall, children's individual learning needs are not met well.
p.2
need to do better?
n The lack of effective oversight by the provider has led to weakness in the quality of the provision. The provider does not monitor the impact of the training staff access or check on the quality of the experiences for children. As a result, they were unaware that leaders with safeguarding responsibilities do not have a sufficient knowledge of the allegations process and that some safeguarding policies are not observed. Despite this, the provider does show some capacity to act on feedback. Action was taken on the day of the inspection to remedy an oversight in recruitment processes. Additionally, information was supplied to Ofsted on all committee members so that checks can be completed. n The provider does not provide staff with effective supervision to ensure that the staff team have the knowledge and skills they need to offer children a good- quality education. Nevertheless, some staff access online training and are
p.2
need to do better?
supported to undertake recognised qualifications. Staff report favourably on workload and feel well supported. However, the lack of effective leadership and management for staff means that sessions are not adequately planned and, overall, fail to meet all the needs of the children attending.
p.2
need to do better?
20 November 2024 n Staff have a poor understanding of the areas of learning they teach. Their interactions are not of a high enough quality to help children make good progress. Staff do not present information to children in the correct order or support children to make the links between what they know already. Planned activities are too difficult for some children to understand or too easy for others. Children make limited gains in their learning, although do enjoy taking part. n Staff equally lack confidence in supporting children in their self-chosen play. At times, staff sit complacently to one side or are overly intrusive, which disrupts children's play. Children's efforts are not always recognised. Staff instruct children to tidy away the train tracks when children have worked hard to design the layout. Children gain little value from planned craft activities, as there is an over reliance by staff on the finished object, rather than the skills children might
p.2
need to do better?
learn when they take part. n Children's emerging language and communication is suitably supported. Staff introduce new vocabulary at story times and occasionally during children's play. They spend time talking to children and supporting them to pronounce words they find difficult to say. Most children sing along at song times and eagerly wave colourful ribbons in the air in time to the music. Staff introduce activities to develop children's literacy, such as naming letters or learning the sounds they make. However, these are too advanced for most of the children, who struggle to join in. n Despite weakness in teaching, staff do support children's emotional well-being to a suitable level. Staff make good use of visual prompts, such as timetables to support children's understanding of what happens next in the day. Children enjoy being outside. They show great skill as they race each other on bicycles. However, staff do not support children's learning well outside. Their interactions
p.3
need to do better?
are limited to a supervisory role only and the lack of planning undermines any value children gain from opportunities to develop their physical skills. n Parents speak positively about the setting. They feel well informed about the activities children take part in through online information and also daily discussions. However, weakness in how staff assess children's progress and plan for this, means parents do not get an accurate picture of children's learning overall.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
ensure all staff have an up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding issues, including the allegations process, so that they are able to identify possible signs of a concern at the earliest opportunity 18/12/2024
p.4
Due date
put in place effective arrangements for the supervision of all staff to ensure professional development plans focus on improving staff's skills and knowledge and staff develop the confidence they need to carry out their responsibilities effectively 19/02/2025
p.4
Due date
plan and deliver educational programmes that support all children to make good progress across the areas of learning, including sequenced learning opportunities that take account of children's interests and build on what they already know and can do. 19/02/2025
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY349727 Local authority West Berkshire Inspection number 10368560 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Sessional day care
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 26 Number of children on roll 10 Name of registered person Kintbury Pre-School Playgroup Committee
p.5
reference number
Telephone number 07765 040269 Date of previous inspection 26 March 2019
p.5
Information about this early years setting
Kintbury Pre-School registered in 2007. It is open on Monday to Friday from 9am to 3pm, during term time only. The pre-school employs three members of staff, one of whom holds a recognised early years qualifications at level 3. It provides funded educational places for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.5
Inspection activities
n The manager joined the inspector on a learning walk and talked to the inspector about the curriculum and what they intend for the children to learn. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided and assessed the impact this was having on children's learning. n The inspector talked to the staff and the children at appropriate times during the inspection. n The inspector completed a joint observation with the manager. n The inspector held a meeting with a representative from the committee. n The inspector looked at relevant documentation and saw evidence of the suitability of the staff. n Parents shared their views of the setting with the inspector.
p.6
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Inspection activities
20 November 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion