Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)

Childminder in Sheffield

Inspected 12 Nov 2024 · published 2 Jan 2025 · URN EY390393

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Jennifer Dove

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Nov 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Jennifer Dove

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Inadequate

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder report

  • URN verified

    EY390393

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2024.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−33Criticalmore positive than 54% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivemake good progresshappywarmpositivenurturingeffectivelylove
Criticismfailedweakpoorweaknessesnot consistentlycompromisedweaknesspoorly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings896w−42
  • Safeguarding94w+14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
960
about usual (typical 899)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 51
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
2
typical 1
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 7%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Children's health, safety and welfare are not given high enough priority. The childminder has failed to address weaknesses identified in her hygiene practices since the last inspection. This does not help to minimise the risk of cross- contamination or the potential spread of infection. This compromises children's health and well-being.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

The childminder does not consider the individual needs of all children when risk assessing the safety and suitability of her sleeping arrangements. For example, the childminder has not considered the risks associated with leaving children to sleep on the sofa. They do not provide children with clean bedding when they are laid down to sleep. Children's health, safety and welfare are compromised.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Children do not receive an acceptable quality of education, overall. The childminder continues to have a weak understanding of how children learn and develop across all seven areas of learning. She does not provide children with purposeful and challenging learning experiences that help to build on their knowledge and skills overtime. As a result, children do not make the best possible progress of which they are capable. The childminder has not addressed the weaknesses in the quality of education provided since the last three inspections. This demonstrates a significant weakness in the childminder's capacity to improve the quality of education.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

That said, children arrive to the setting happy and excited. They build close and secure attachments with the childminder, who is warm, welcoming and friendly. The childminder acts as a positive role model to children with their kind and nurturing approach. Children play well with their friends and learn how to cooperate, share and take turns with support from the childminder. However, due to the poorly planned curriculum, children do not consistently have opportunities that help to keep them engaged in meaningful play. This has an impact on children's motivation to learn.

p.2

need to do better?

n The childminder has failed to take appropriate steps to address weaknesses identified in the quality of education and care provided. Although the childminder has undertaken some training and engaged with support offered by the local authority, this has not helped to drive the improvements needed. Consequently, the childminder has not improved her knowledge of how to plan an effective curriculum or implement effective hygiene practices. n The childminder's hygiene practices continue to be poor. For example, the childminder does not recognise the potential risks of feeding children food that

p.2

need to do better?

12 November 2024 she knows has been contaminated with other children's saliva. She does not consider the impact that these poor hygiene practices have on children's health and well-being. This does not help to minimise the risk of the spread of infection and does not promote children's good health. n The childminder does not implement safe sleeping arrangements in practice. She has a weak understanding of how to identify and minimise risks to children while they sleep. For example, the childminder has not considered the risks of leaving children to sleep on the sofa. The childminder places children down to sleep with blankets that have been used during play by other children. This does not help to minimise the risk of the spread of infection and compromises children's health, safety and welfare. n Although the childminder monitors and tracks children's learning, she does not use her knowledge of what children need to learn next, to plan purposeful and

p.2

need to do better?

challenging activities and learning opportunities that help to build on what children already know and can do. Furthermore, the childminder still does not plan a curriculum that is broad and covers all seven areas of learning. Learning is often incidental and left to chance. As a result, children are not well prepared for their future learning and do not make good levels of progress. n The childminder does not support children to develop their mathematical skills effectively. For example, she asks children to count the total number of items in a group. However, the childminder does not respond to misconceptions when children miscount the total number of items. The childminder increases the difficulty of the task for younger children who were unable to answer the simpler mathematical equation correctly. This demonstrates that children's learning is not consistently well matched and targeted towards their individual needs.

p.3

need to do better?

n Children develop a love of reading. They cuddle up to the childminder and listen intently as she reads. Children look at the illustrations and answer questions about what they think is happening in the story. The childminder gives the children the time they need to respond to the questions she asks. This helps to develop children's communication, speech and language skills well. n The childminder has implemented new routines for children who use dummies. Children now leave their dummies in their bags when they enter the setting. They only use their dummies when they are settling down to sleep. The childminder has developed her understanding of the negative impact dummies can have on children's speech development. She has shared this information with parents to promote children's language development at home. n There is a good two-way flow of communication between parents and other settings children attend. The childminder shares information about children's

p.3

need to do better?

learning and development with both parents and professionals at the different nurseries children attend. This helps to promote a consistent approach towards children's learning.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's

p.3

Due date

complete professional development to ensure the knowledge and skills required to understand the areas of learning taught 03/12/2024

p.4

Due date

take steps to implement effective hygiene practices 03/12/2024

p.4

Due date

implement effective safe sleeping arrangements that take account of the potential risks posed to children. 03/12/2024

p.4

Due date

plan and deliver broad educational programmes which are appropriately sequenced and targeted to individual learning needs of all children, to support them to make good progress in all areas of learning. 10/12/2024

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY390393 Local authority Sheffield Inspection number 10361041 Type of provision Childminder

p.5

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder

p.5

inspection

Total number of places 3 Number of children on roll 2 Date of previous inspection 2 July 2024

p.5

Information about this early years setting

The childminder registered in 2009 and lives in Sheffield. She operates all year round, except for bank holidays and family holidays. Sessions are from 8.30am to 5pm, on Mondays and Tuesdays only. The childminder provides funded early education places for two- and three-year-old children.

p.5

Inspection activities

n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises with the childminder. n The childminder and the inspector discussed how the childminder organises their early years provision, including their intentions for children's learning. n Children interacted with the inspector during the inspection. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The childminder provided the inspector with a sample of key documentation on request.

p.5

Inspection activities

12 November 2024 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.5

Inspection activities

12 November 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion