Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Orchard Day Nursery
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Orchard Resources Limited
- Group reference verified
RP520457
- Inspection date verified
17 Oct 2024
- Inspectors verified
Mandy Cooper
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
RG4 6LJ
- Name on report verified
Orchard Day Nursery
- URN verified
EY225572
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- For example, leaders fail to conduct required checks for those in governance, safe recruitment practices are poorly implemented, and food safety procedures are ineffective. p.2
- For instance, during free-play activities, some children become overly excited and begin to climb on unsafe items. p.2
- Furthermore, procedures for managing allergies and dietary requirements are inadequate. p.2
- They do not make enough progress, and the gaps in their development are at risk of p.2
- Staff sometimes fail to notice when younger children struggle to engage in parts of the day or when activities are not suitable for their age and developmental stage. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, children with SEND do not get the help they need to develop positive attitudes to play and learning. p.2
- implement robust procedures around mealtimes and improve preparation of foods and the management of allergies and dietary needs to ensure all risks to children's safety are minimised 14/11/2024 p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment7
“In addition, risk assessments are poor.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 956
- about usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Orchard Day Nursery 239 Henley Road, Caversham, Reading, Berkshire RG4 6LJ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Weaknesses in leadership and management affect children's safety and well-being. For example, leaders fail to conduct required checks for those in governance, safe recruitment practices are poorly implemented, and food safety procedures are ineffective. In addition, risk assessments are poor. Outdoor areas have loose ropes, broken gate locks and stacked heavy boxes, all of which pose a risk to children. These issues do not ensure children's safety. However, staff know the proper channels for reporting concerns regarding a child's welfare and leaders show a commitment to making the necessary improvements.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Leaders and managers are in the process of recruiting new staff, due to changes in the team. While the minimum staff-to-child ratios are met, current staffing arrangements do not fully support children's learning and development. For example, some staff constantly fail to engage with, or support, children. They stand silently as children play and do not interact with them to support their learning. That said, other staff enthusiastically introduce new words to younger children, such as 'pumpkin'.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
In the main, children arrive happily and enjoy their time at nursery. For example, children excitedly chat back and forth as they work together to build an 'aeroplane' from large blocks. However, leaders and staff do not plan an ambitious curriculum. Children who are quieter and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are not consistently supported to make the best possible progress. For instance, during free-play activities, some children become overly excited and begin to climb on unsafe items. Staff are inconsistent in managing this behaviour, sometimes ignoring the negative behaviour. This inconsistency does not help children to understand behaviour expectations.
p.2
need to do better?
n Leaders and managers fail to implement robust recruitment and vetting procedures. They do not conduct the necessary checks to ensure that staff are deemed suitable. Leaders do not maintain accurate records of enhanced criminal records checks and barred list checks for staff who have lived or worked abroad. This means they cannot be certain of the staff's suitability to care for children. Furthermore, leaders have not obtained the required Ofsted vetting for all named directors of their organisation. As a result, critical suitability checks are missing, which compromises children's safety and well-being. n Risk assessments are ineffective. Although staff complete daily risk assessments and identify hazards, leaders do not take timely action to maintain a safe environment. For example, staff fail to remove hazards, such as growing fungi or weeds in children's play areas, even after identifying them. This means children
p.2
need to do better?
17 October 2024 are exposed to risks in the nursery environment. n Leaders do not ensure that staff have the necessary knowledge to recognise and address risks during mealtimes. For instance, staff do not prepare food appropriately for the age and developmental stage of each child. Furthermore, procedures for managing allergies and dietary requirements are inadequate. Staff did not know the signs or symptoms to indicate if a child had been exposed to an allergen. They do not know how to respond if this happened. As a result, children's health and well-being are compromised. n Leaders receive support from external agencies, such as speech and language therapists. However, children with SEND do not get the help they need to develop positive attitudes to play and learning. In addition, staff do not effectively communicate daily routines to these children, causing confusion. They do not make enough progress, and the gaps in their development are at risk of
p.2
need to do better?
widening. n Leaders do not ensure staff understand the appropriate strategies to support behaviour, which leads to them physically moving children. Additionally, some children's disruptive behaviour leads to ongoing interruptions that affect other children's learning, as they become distracted and disengaged. n Some staff offer children a wide variety of enjoyable learning experiences, such as making clay lanterns and exploring the texture of the inside of pumpkins. However, staff do not receive adequate supervision to support them in their role. While leaders have identified aspects of their practice that need improvement, action has been insufficient. For instance, staff do not receive adequate support to plan and implement an age-appropriate curriculum. Staff sometimes fail to notice when younger children struggle to engage in parts of the day or when activities are not suitable for their age and developmental stage. This means
p.3
need to do better?
some children miss out on valuable learning opportunities that would support their next steps in development. Leaders know that some staff do not provide positive and purposeful interactions to further children's learning and development. However, they have not taken effective steps to address this and raise the quality of teaching to a high standard. This inhibits children's progress.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
17 October 2024 ensure leaders provide Ofsted with details of those with governance to ensure relevant suitability checks are completed 14/11/2024
p.3
Due date
ensure that any additional criminal record checks (or checks if more than one country) are made for anyone who has lived or worked abroad 14/11/2024
p.4
Due date
implement effective risk assessments to ensure that all areas children have access to are safe and suitable for purpose, with particular regard to the outside areas 14/11/2024
p.4
Due date
implement robust procedures around mealtimes and improve preparation of foods and the management of allergies and dietary needs to ensure all risks to children's safety are minimised 14/11/2024
p.4
Due date
plan and implement an age-appropriate, broad and well-balanced curriculum that is tailored to the individual needs of children, including those with SEND 14/11/2024
p.4
Due date
implement effective strategies for managing children's behaviours so they know and understand what is expected of them 14/11/2024
p.4
Due date
develop the monitoring of the provision, in particular to improve the coaching and mentoring of staff to identify gaps in practice to improve teaching. 14/11/2024
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY225572 Local authority Reading Inspection number 10364193 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 54 Number of children on roll 45 Name of registered person Orchard Resources Limited
p.5
reference number
Telephone number 0118 947 5797 Date of previous inspection 30 January 2019
p.5
Information about this early years setting
Orchard Day Nursery registered in 1989. It is based in Caversham, on the outskirts of Reading. The nursery is open each weekday from 8am to 6pm, all year round. The nursery receives funding for the provision of free early education for children aged from nine months to four years. The nursery employs 19 staff who work directly with children. Of these, two hold early years professional status, two hold a qualification at level 6, one at level 5, and four hold relevant qualifications at level 2 or level 3.
p.5
Inspection activities
n The inspector viewed the nursery and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n The deputy managers and inspector completed a learning walk together of all areas of the nursery and discussed the early years curriculum. n Children told the inspector about their friends and what they like to do when they are at nursery. n The inspector talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspector spoke with the nominated individual about the leadership and management of the setting. n Staff spoke to the inspector about how they support children with SEND. n The inspector and the deputy manager carried out a joint observation of a communication and language activity. n The inspector observed the interactions between staff and the children. n Parents shared their views of the setting with the inspector. n The inspector looked at relevant documentation and reviewed evidence of the
p.6
Inspection activities
suitability of staff working in the nursery.
p.6
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Inspection activities
17 October 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion