Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Hardwick Green Primary Academy

Inspected 6 Nov 2024 · published 12 Dec 2024 · URN 139392

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Georgina Chinaka (lead), Helen Smith, Lynn George

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Nov 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Georgina Chinaka, Helen Smith, Lynn George

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    TS19 8WF

  • Name on report verified

    Hardwick Green Primary Academy

  • URN verified

    139392

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+37Positivemore positive than 31% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivenurturingeffectivestrengthhigh expectationsconsistentlyambitiouswell-planned
Criticisminconsistenciesnot consistentlypoorinconsistencylackstruggleyet tonot well prepared

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1273w+35
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,250
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of Hardwick Green Primary Academy Tithe Barn Road, Stockton-on-Tees TS19 8WF

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good

p.1

The principal of this school is Christopher Story. The school is part of The Enquire Learning Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Darren Holmes, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Delyse Turrell. 5 and 6 November 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Hardwick Green Primary Academy has care and support at the heart of all it does. Pupils enjoy coming to school each day, knowing that staff want the best for them. Behaviour around school is calm and positive, with clear routines that help pupils feel safe and ready to learn. Pupils say they know who to talk to if they have any worries. Parents value the effective communication between home and school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

While pupils benefit from a nurturing environment, some aspects of the quality of education need to improve to ensure that all pupils reach their full academic potential, particularly in reading and mathematics. There are inconsistencies in curriculum delivery that mean some pupils, particularly those with disadvantage, are not as well prepared for the next stage of their education as they should be.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school prioritises well-being and personal development, helping pupils to feel valued and supported. Pupils show respect for others and benefit from various extra-curricular opportunities, such as the popular street dance class, eco club and residential visits. Staff teach pupils how to keep themselves safe in the local area and when online. Parents, pupils and staff are confident in the school’s commitment to keeping pupils safe.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has designed a broad and ambitious curriculum. This begins right at the start in the early years. However, the curriculum is not consistently well implemented. In some subjects, teachers do not emphasise the most important knowledge that pupils should learn. At times, the activities that teachers choose do not help pupils to learn and remember the knowledge they need. This inconsistency affects pupils’ ability to build knowledge progressively over time. While staff monitor pupils’ understanding, they do not consistently use this information to guide future learning. Currently, the school is sometimes unsure if pupils are remembering essential knowledge and skills.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Staff show genuine care for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and prioritise creating a welcoming and supportive environment. The school has improved its approach to help these pupils achieve and succeed alongside their peers. Some pupils with SEND access tailored support through smaller lesson groupings, called ‘SEND pods’, and personalised interventions.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Recent changes to the reading curriculum are having a positive impact in the early years and key stage 1. This is helping pupils develop a stronger foundation in phonics and early reading. Pupils who struggle with reading receive additional support. However, there are also inconsistencies in how well the reading curriculum is implemented, which hamper pupils’ achievement. The school has recently introduced strategies and tasks to improve fluency and reading skills. These initiatives have yet to show significant impact. Reading outcomes remain below national expectations, especially for disadvantaged pupils.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The early years provision is a strength. The school has developed a nurturing and stimulating environment that encourages children’s curiosity and exploration. The 5 and 6 November 2024

p.2

3

curriculum is well considered, allowing children to develop early literacy, numeracy and social skills. The exciting outdoor area has been carefully designed to develop children’s large muscle strength and creative skills. The school has prioritised developing children’s communication and language in Nursery and Reception. Children benefit from rich interactions with adults, who support them in building their understanding of the world. This foundation prepares children well for key stage 1.

p.3

3

Pupils behave well and understand the school’s high expectations. Staff manage behaviour consistently. The reward systems and praise from staff encourage pupils to display positive behaviour. Pupils are polite and engaged in their learning. The school’s calm and orderly environment helps pupils feel secure. Pupils are kind and welcoming to new pupils when they join the school. Staff sensitively provide targeted support for pupils who may need additional help in managing their behaviour. The school actively monitors and challenges any instances of poor attendance. Staff work closely with families to ensure that pupils attend regularly, with a sharp focus on improving attendance for disadvantaged pupils. As a result, pupils attend school well and on time.

p.3

3

The commitment to pupils’ character development is evident throughout school. The personal, social and health education (PSHE) and ‘character’ curriculum helps pupils develop values such as resilience and empathy. The school has chosen to introduce programmes and workshops to teach pupils how to manage their emotions through understanding how the brain works. Staff are well trained to promote well-being and positive mental health for pupils across school. Pupils benefit from the regular opportunities to reflect on global news and equalities. Alongside the well-planned extra- curricular activities and educational visits, this is widening pupils’ experiences and raising their aspirations.

p.3

3

The school is dedicated to creating a nurturing environment. However, the school does not strategically evaluate the impact of improvement actions. It does not check carefully enough to ensure that the changes being made are having a positive impact on pupils’ achievement. Staff workload and well-being are well managed. Staff are proud to work in this school and serve the local community.

p.3

3

The school benefits from the development opportunities and networks provided by the trust. Trustees and governors provide a high level of support for leaders. However, they have not done enough to challenge the school to further improve the quality of education.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some subjects, staff do not implement the curriculum in a way that consistently enables pupils to build their knowledge over time. As a result, pupils do not achieve as 5 and 6 November 2024

p.3

4

well as they should. The school should ensure that staff are well equipped to support more consistent curriculum delivery to support pupils’ knowledge progression and development of core skills.  The school does not accurately identify gaps in pupils’ knowledge or when pupils are ready to move on to new learning quickly enough. This means that pupils’ attainment and progress is slower than it should be. The school should develop a system to identify what pupils know and remember and adapt the curriculum accordingly.  The school’s oversight and strategic evaluation of its curriculum development is not as robust as it should be. This contributes to a lack of prioritisation regarding the curriculum areas needing the most focus. The school should strengthen oversight of the quality of education and evaluating curriculum impact.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 5 and 6 November 2024

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 15 May 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school provides nursery education for two- and three-year-old children.  The school offers a free breakfast club.  The school does not currently use any alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. 5 and 6 November 2024

p.5

6

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, religious education and physical education. Inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons and spoke to teachers and teaching assistants. They spoke to pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors listened to pupils reading with a familiar adult. Inspectors met with leaders to discuss history and science.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around

p.6

6

safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors gathered the views of parents informally in person and formally through responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View, and free-text responses. The views of staff were considered through the staff survey and through meetings with them. Pupils’ views were considered through pupil meetings.  Inspectors spoke with representatives from the trust, board of trustees and the academy improvement committee.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in classes, at breakfast club and during breaks and at lunchtime.

p.6

Inspection team

Georgina Chinaka, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Helen Smith Ofsted Inspector 5 and 6 November 2024

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion