Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)
Childminder in Leicestershire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
7 Nov 2024
- Inspectors verified
Emily Lofts
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Met
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
226162
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Because of the limited learning opportunities and poor interaction from the childminder, children quickly become disengaged with the activities on offer and wander aimlessly around the room. p.2
- Children's safety and welfare are compromised. p.2
- Children receive a significantly poor quality of education. p.2
- For example, when children arrive at the setting with existing injuries, she fails to fully establish the cause. p.2
- As a result, children's welfare is not given enough consideration, and they receive a poor quality of education. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- While she is able to say what she should do if there are concerns about a child's safety, the childminder chooses to accept parents' explanations for injuries without exploring further. p.2
- The childminder recognises she should not do this but simply trusts that the individuals would not pose a risk to children as she has known them a long time. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Records & policies4
“Furthermore, records about children are missing vital information.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 942
- about usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Met
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Children's safety and welfare are compromised. The childminder does not demonstrate enough knowledge and understanding about how to keep children safe. For example, children are left with adults whose suitability has not been checked by Ofsted. Children are exposed to potential risks and hazards because the childminder has not ensured that her home is a safe place for children to play. Furthermore, records about children are missing vital information. The brief information the childminder does hold has been collected and recorded by an adult who is not authorised to access the information.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children receive a significantly poor quality of education. The childminder does not know the children she is caring for well enough. Because of the limited learning opportunities and poor interaction from the childminder, children quickly become disengaged with the activities on offer and wander aimlessly around the room. The childminder does not know what the developmental expectations are for the ages of the children she is caring for. Therefore, children are not supported to make the progress they are capable of.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Despite the weaknesses in knowledge and practice, the childminder has a secure bond with children. They go to her for comfort and when they need reassurance. Children snuggle up to the childminder when they are feeling tired.
p.2
need to do better?
n The childminder leaves children unsupervised with adults who have not been subject to the necessary suitability checks. The childminder recognises she should not do this but simply trusts that the individuals would not pose a risk to children as she has known them a long time. This places children at risk. n The childminder does not show enough professional curiosity with regards to safeguarding children. For example, when children arrive at the setting with existing injuries, she fails to fully establish the cause. While she is able to say what she should do if there are concerns about a child's safety, the childminder chooses to accept parents' explanations for injuries without exploring further. This means that safeguarding concerns may not be swiftly dealt with to ensure that children are kept safe. n The childminder has not made a risk assessment of her home to ensure that it is safe and suitable for the children she is caring for. Items are unsafely stacked on
p.2
need to do better?
tables that children walk near when accessing the bathroom. Cables are within easy access of children's reach. Furthermore, during the inspection the inspector observed that the childminder did not notice when a visitor to her home left a recently boiled kettle near the edge of the work surface, within children's reach. Therefore, children are exposed to unnecessary hazards in the home.
p.2
need to do better?
7 November 2024 n The childminder is not obtaining required information about children. Records, that were only completed on the day of the inspection, are missing vital information, such as parents' names and who has parental responsibility for children. Furthermore, information and records about children and families are not maintained confidentially. n The childminder does not take steps to develop her skills and knowledge. Aside from safeguarding training, the childminder has not sought out any support that will help to improve her practice. Despite recognising that her knowledge is not good, she has not put anything in place to try to rectify this. As a result, children's welfare is not given enough consideration, and they receive a poor quality of education. n The childminder has not ensured that there is a regular two-way flow of information between herself and children's parents. The childminder does not
p.2
need to do better?
find out about what children already know and can do at home. Key information about children is not shared to promote consistency of care and learning. For example, the childminder does not communicate with parents that children are finding it challenging to drink water out of a bottle using a straw. By chance, the childminder discovers that children are much more confident at drinking from an open cup. n The childminder does not have enough understanding or knowledge about how children learn and develop. Therefore, she does not know how to effectively assess children or know how to plan opportunities that build on what children already know and can do. While the childminder is kind and caring to children, she simply supervises their play. The childminder's focus of activities is asking children what colour toys are. As the interactions with children are poor, children lose interest in activities quickly. Any learning that does take place is incidental.
p.3
need to do better?
n The childminder does not support children to develop their communication and language effectively. She uses the incorrect pronunciation for some words, and when copied by the children, the childminder praises them. This teaches children how to say words incorrectly.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
7 November 2024 ensure children are not left unsupervised with people whose suitability has not been check by Ofsted 06/12/2024
p.3
Due date
ensure a robust knowledge of safeguarding that can be implemented with confidence as required 06/12/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure a robust risk assessment is in place, and that children are not exposed to potential risks and hazards 06/12/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure all required information is obtained about children and recorded accurately 06/12/2024
p.4
Due date
undertake further training or support to enhance knowledge and understanding of how the early years foundation stage is accessed 06/12/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure there is a two-way flow of information with parents and carers to ensure children's needs can be met 06/12/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure confidentiality is maintained regarding records about children 06/12/2024
p.4
Due date
plan a challenging and engaging curriculum for children 06/12/2024
p.4
Due date
use accurate assessments of children's learning and development to plan activities appropriate to their stage of development 06/12/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure that children's communication and language development is supported effectively. 06/12/2024
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 226162 Local authority Leicestershire Inspection number 10371237 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 1 Date of previous inspection 22 September 2022
p.5
Information about this early years setting
The childminder registered in 1983 and lives in Ratby, Leicestershire. She works from Monday to Friday, 7am to 6pm, except for bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder holds an appropriate early years qualification at level 3.
p.5
Inspection activities
n We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received about the provider. n The inspector viewed the premises used for childminding. n The inspector observed the quality of education and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. n The inspector spoke to children at appropriate times during the inspection. n The inspector viewed written feedback from parents. n The childminder viewed a sample of key documentation on request.
p.5
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Inspection activities
7 November 2024 7 November 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion