Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Springwell Community College

Inspected 6 Nov 2024 · published 11 Dec 2024 · URN 147400

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anne Maingay (lead), Chris Stevens, Julie Sheppard, Matthew Sammy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Nov 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Anne Maingay, Chris Stevens, Julie Sheppard, Matthew Sammy

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    S43 3NQ

  • Name on report verified

    Springwell Community College

  • URN verified

    147400

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+24Mostly positivemore positive than 19% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivehigh expectationspositiveconsistentsuccessfullypolitehappysafe
Criticismweaknessesgapsfailedtoo manyslowlyabsencesuspensionsnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1119w+22
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,102
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 37%

Full report text

Inspection of Springwell Community College Middlecroft Road, Staveley, Chesterfield, Derbyshire S43 3NQ

p.1

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement

p.1

The headteacher of this school is Ian Wingfield. This school is part of The Two Counties Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Wesley Davies, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Karen Potts. There is also an executive headteacher, Andrew O’Brien, who is responsible for this school and one other. 5 and 6 November 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Springwell Community College has been through a transformative change in recent years. This is reflected in the views of pupils and many parents and carers. Pupils know and demonstrate the school’s values of ‘ambition, commitment and kindness’. They value the rewards they receive, including the ‘golden tickets’ for demonstrating the school values.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has high expectations of all pupils’ academic achievement. With a strengthened curriculum, pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), are now learning more successfully than they did in the past.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has worked hard and developed routines to promote a positive learning environment for all pupils. There is a consistent approach across the school to how behaviour is managed and there are high expectations for behaviour. Most pupils understand and meet these expectations. The school is calm and orderly. Pupils typically behave sensibly in lessons and at unstructured times. They are polite and well-mannered. They treat each other, and staff, respectfully. Bullying appears rare and pupils trust adults to deal with it. As a result, pupils feel happy and safe in this school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

One parent, typical of many, stated: ‘The staff are kind and caring, and encourage the children to be the best they can be’.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Previous weaknesses in the school’s curriculum failed to prepare pupils well enough for their next stages in education, employment or training. The school has redesigned and significantly strengthened the curriculum in all subjects. Improvements in the quality of education provided by the school are benefitting pupils, who have an increasingly detailed understanding of the subjects that they learn. However, the published outcomes for pupils at the end of Year 11 are lagging behind the strides that have been made in the quality of education that pupils receive.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Teachers are well-trained and knowledgeable. The school has identified consistent and effective strategies to deliver the curriculum through the ‘Springwell lesson’. Teachers ensure that pupils regularly revisit the most important content in each subject.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Some pupils have gaps in their knowledge as a result of previous weaknesses in the curriculum. The school makes regular checks on what pupils know. In the most effective lessons, teachers use information from these checks to adapt their teaching well. In some lessons, teachers do not routinely use this information to close any gaps in pupils’ knowledge or address misconceptions more quickly.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school accurately identifies any additional needs that pupils may have, including for pupils with SEND. Teachers get clear information about how they can meet these needs. Most staff use this information well to support these pupils. Pupils with SEND access the same curriculum as their peers. Their outcomes are improving. 5 and 6 November 2024

p.2

3

The school quickly identifies pupils who need support to become confident and fluent readers. Staff use assessment strategies well to ensure that these pupils get the right level of support. This support helps these pupils to improve their reading skills.

p.3

3

Attendance is a high priority for the school. The school has taken action that has begun to improve rates of attendance. Pupils’ attendance is slowly rising. Despite this, too many pupils continue to have high levels of absence from school, particularly pupils with SEND.

p.3

3

Suspensions have been higher than the national average. Suspensions have considerably reduced during this academic year as a result of the school supporting pupils to reflect and understand the impact of their conduct on others, and the consistent application of the school’s behaviour policy by staff. This is a trend that leaders are determined to continue.

p.3

3

The school’s personal development programme celebrates diversity. Pupils have a clear understanding of how to stay safe and be healthy. The extra-curricular programme includes house competitions and master classes. Pupils benefit from effective careers education and guidance. Events such as careers fairs provide pupils and parents with detailed information about the opportunities available to them.

p.3

3

The school and multi-academy trust are united in their vision to improve the school. They have brought about changes that are having a positive impact on many aspects of the school’s work. This is underpinned by effective professional development, which includes a college-wide coaching programme for teachers. Leaders are considerate of staff well- being and workload.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Sometimes, the school’s use of assessment does not accurately check pupils’ knowledge and how well pupils have understood important concepts. As a result, some pupils move on to new learning before they are ready, or there are gaps in their learning that impact on their progress. The school should ensure that assessment enables teachers to gain a secure picture of pupils’ knowledge and understanding and adapt their teaching accordingly.  Too many pupils, particularly pupils with SEND, have high levels of absence from school. While the school has taken action that has begun to improve rates of attendance and pupils’ attendance is slowly rising, this is not yet having the impact it needs to. This restricts their progress, because they miss out on learning as well as the wider opportunities on offer. The school should continue to work with pupils and 5 and 6 November 2024

p.3

4

families to ensure that they identify and overcome barriers to pupils’ attendance, so that pupils attend school regularly.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 5 and 6 November 2024

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 14 and 15 June 2022, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 This school is part of The Two Counties Academies Trust.  The school uses two unregistered alternative providers for a small number of pupils.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 5 and 6 November 2024

p.5

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school's education provision.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English; mathematics; science; and history. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work where available.  To explore the wider curriculum, inspectors also discussed the curriculum in two other

p.6

6

subjects with curriculum leaders and looked at pupils’ work.  Inspectors met with the headteacher, school senior leaders, staff from curriculum learning areas and senior leaders from the trust.  Inspectors met with pupils to discuss their views.  Inspectors observed social times.  The lead inspector met with representatives the trust, including the chair of trustees and the CEO of the trust.  The lead inspector met governors, including the chair of the local governing body.  Inspectors reviewed a range of documentation on the school website and documentation relating to the governance of the school.  Inspectors reviewed a range of documents and records linking to attendance and behaviour.  Inspectors considered the views of pupils, parents and staff through discussions and a consideration of their responses to the online surveys, including the free-text facility in Ofsted Parent View. Inspectors also had telephone conversations with several parents.

p.6

Inspection team

Anne Maingay, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Chris Stevens Ofsted Inspector 5 and 6 November 2024

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion