Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Ungraded school inspection

Linden Primary School

Inspected 13 Nov 2024 · published 9 Dec 2024 · URN 120068

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andy Lakatos

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Nov 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Andy Lakatos

  • Postcode verified

    LE5 6AD

  • Name on report verified

    Linden Primary School

  • URN verified

    120068

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+21Mostly positivemore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiverespectfulpositiveeffectivelyimprovedwell sequencedextremelystrong
Criticismgapsconcernsweakpoorseriousnot alwaysnot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1279w+19
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,280
about usual (typical 1282)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 60, typical 51
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 3
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Inspection of a school judged good for overall effectiveness before September 2024: Linden Primary School Headland Road, Evington, Leicester, Leicestershire LE5 6AD

p.1

Inspection dates: 12 and 13 November 2024

p.1

Outcome

Linden Primary School has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at the previous inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

This is a friendly and welcoming school. Pupils have a diverse range of faiths, cultures and languages. They are respectful of any differences between themselves and others. They show each other genuine care, empathy and understanding. The school is a happy family.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are polite and courteous. They listen carefully to adults and talk to each other in a respectful and mature manner. Pupils learn about bullying. They know it is not right and that they must report it to an adult. Incidents are rare and are dealt with swiftly.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe. If they have any worries, they speak to a trusted adult. They can also use the ‘worry-box’ to share any concerns. Staff are always on hand to help out.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils have positive attitudes to learning. They know they are expected to try hard and that teachers will help them learn. Pupils try their best in lessons and relish the challenges set by the staff.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The pupils live out the school values of integrity, compassion, growth and respect. They know that these values are important and will make a difference in their lives. Pupils who demonstrate these values are celebrated each week in the awards assembly.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has a sharp focus on helping pupils to read. The newly implemented phonics approach includes many opportunities for pupils to read to adults. The books that pupils read match their knowledge well. Staff are well trained. They deliver phonics effectively. 12 and 13 November 2024

p.1

2

Any misconceptions or gaps in knowledge are picked up quickly. Checks on pupils’ learning are frequent. Extra support is provided when needed. This helps pupils who have fallen behind to catch up quickly.

p.2

2

The school has thought carefully about how best to help pupils learn. There is now an agreed approach. One pupil, with a comment that was typical of many, said, ‘I learn new things because the teacher shows me exactly what I need to do.’ As a result, pupils learn and remember important knowledge in the core subjects. For example, pupils in Year 6 can explain how to add mixed fractions. In Year 1, pupils can use different mathematical models well to add three numbers.

p.2

2

The school has reviewed other curriculum areas. In these subjects, the curriculum is well sequenced. The school has identified the important knowledge that pupils need to learn. However, some staff do not check well enough if pupils have learned this knowledge. As a result, some pupils have gaps in their learning. In addition, in some subjects the quality of the presentation of pupils’ work is weak. Many pupils do not have the handwriting skills they need to form letters correctly and join them appropriately.

p.2

2

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are well supported. In class, they benefit from a well-adapted curriculum that suits their needs. For example, the use of word symbols helps some of these pupils to write at length. ‘Now, next and then’ prompts help these pupils settle into the class routine. Pupils with SEND appreciate being able to use the ‘Rainbow Room’ when they need a quiet space. Any pupils with high levels of need are supported extremely well by highly personalised curriculums.

p.2

2

The school has robust processes in place to monitor attendance. A well-defined, staged approach is used effectively in order to help pupils come to school often. As a result, attendance has improved.

p.2

2

Children in the early years make a strong start. The curriculum is designed skilfully to ensure that their learning builds well over time. Staff know what children need to learn. They work alongside children during their play, developing children’s language and understanding. Children share equipment with one another and listen carefully. They can focus their attention for long periods of time. Staff are preparing children well for their next stage.

p.2

2

Staff are wholly positive about support for their own well-being. They are proud to work at the school. They feel motivated and respected. They say that leaders are very mindful of their workload.

p.2

2

Pupils broaden their understanding and deepen their learning through the many trips that the school provides. This includes visiting places where pupils learn how to stay safe. Pupils show an awareness of the fundamental British values. They learn about different faiths and visit places of worship. Pupils become members of the school council or join the ‘eco-council’. They enjoy taking part in wider activities, such as football club or archery lessons. 12 and 13 November 2024

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Not all pupils have acquired the necessary skills to produce well-formed and joined letters. As a result, the presentation of pupils’ written work is sometimes of a poor quality and their writing can be difficult to read. The school needs to further develop its agreed approach to improve pupils’ handwriting skills and the presentation of their written work.  In some subjects in the wider curriculum, pupils do not always learn the planned knowledge. As a result, pupils’ learning does not build systematically, and this creates gaps in what they know. The school should develop its approach to checking what pupils know and remember so that gaps in their learning can be identified quickly and resolved.

p.3

Background

Until September 2024, on a graded (section 5) inspection we gave schools an overall effectiveness grade, in addition to the key and provision judgements. Overall effectiveness grades given before September 2024 will continue to be visible on school inspection reports and on Ofsted’s website. From September 2024, graded inspections will not include an overall effectiveness grade. This school was, before September 2024, judged good for its overall effectiveness.

p.3

Background

We have now inspected the school to determine whether it has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at that previous inspection. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school’s work has improved significantly or that it may not be as strong as it was at the last inspection, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection. A graded inspection is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good for overall effectiveness in June 2019. 12 and 13 November 2024

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with SEND; pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 12 and 13 November 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Chair of governing body Saiful Chowdhury

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 11 and 12 June 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is a larger-than-average sized primary school.  The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is much higher than the national average.  There have been significant changes to the school’s leadership since the previous inspection.  The school operates a breakfast club.  The school does not use any alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in this evaluation of the school. 12 and 13 November 2024

p.5

6

 The inspector held discussions with the headteacher and other members of the senior leadership team. The inspector met with members of the local governing body and spoke with a representative of the local authority.  The inspector focused inspection activity on the following groups of subjects: early English and early mathematics, geography and physical education. For each group of subjects, the inspector visited a sample of lessons, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspector considered the views of parents and carers through Ofsted Parent view. He also took account of staff’s and pupils’ views through their responses to Ofsted’s

p.6

Inspection team

Andy Lakatos, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector 12 and 13 November 2024

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion