Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's home run by HMO NE Ltd

Inspected 29 Oct 2024 · URN 2780235

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    HMO NE LTD

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Oct 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Kate Jackson

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    2780235

  • URN verified

    2780235

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveeffectiveskilledhigh expectationsstrong relationshipsconfidentsensitivelypositively
Criticismmissednot effectivelackharmlimitednot accuratenot accurately

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1027w+36
  • What needs to improve204w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,230
about usual (typical 1319)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 51
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 22%

Full report text

Inspection report for children’s home: 2780235 1 Registered provider: HMO NE LTD Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

A private company owns and manages this children’s home. It provides care for up to two children who may have social and emotional difficulties.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

At the time of the inspection, one child was living at the home and spoke to the inspector.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The manager registered with Ofsted in July 2024.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of last inspection: not previously inspected

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: not applicable

p.1

good

Enforcement action since last inspection: not applicable Inspection report for children’s home: 2780235 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff are skilled at building positive relationships with children. Children trust staff and develop a sense of belonging. This has supported the child to stay in the home longer than in any previous placement and to be able to identify a trusted adult. The child is making progress from their starting points.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The child can access a wide range of activities. Hobbies and interests are explored to identify activities of interest, and staff seek out new experiences for children. The child can participate fully in activities that are planned and assessed to ensure safety. These are captured as memories in a digital format, which is the child’s preferred method of communication.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff use different approaches to gather children’s views, which are documented in records regarding their care. The child’s voice is heard. They are supported to attend their meetings and feel confident in sharing their wishes and feelings to influence their care planning. This means the child is participating in the decision-making processes about their care.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The child knows how to make a complaint. Information about how to complain is provided in the children’s guide with direct access through a QR code. This has been effective and in line with child’s preferred communication method. When children make a complaint, they understand the process and are kept involved in the complaint progression. The child said that when they made a complaint it was easy and they felt listened to.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children who do not attend school are supported in their learning. The child came to live at the home with no education in place, but is now engaged in an alternative education package and has requested to be back in school. Staff are encouraging healthy sleep routines and providing additional learning opportunities to promote a routine for when an education setting is identified.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children moving into the home are welcomed sensitively. The child is supported by staff to manage their own emotions positively and treated with dignity and respect; staff spend time learning about the child and their journey. This enables staff to support the child and develop a positive relationship, helping the child build emotional resilience and trust.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The child feels safe. Staff provide care in line with the child’s plans to provide consistency and help the child feel protected. When the child’s plan has not been followed and this is identified, it is addressed by the manager. This ensures consistency in the care provided to the child. Inspection report for children’s home: 2780235 3 Staff understand the risks associated with the child living at the home. Risk assessments are reviewed regularly, and they provide strategies and plans for staff to follow. Written records are completed, and in some examples, they are linked with other documents to ensure clarity. Where some documents are not completed or not linked together, there is a lack of transparency, which is misleading and could result in a missed learning opportunity.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff are skilled at de-escalation. Staff use instant rewards to recognise children making positive choices; the use of consequences is rare. Not all consequences are recorded and records that reflect a consequence are not written to reflect a restorative approach.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The child receives support to explore and understand their own emotions in a positive way. Staff support the child to consider their choices. Staff complete written records to reflect the discussions they have had with the child. Consistency in recording and use of language varies in these documents. This has not been identified or addressed in the manager’s review processes.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Room searches are completed sensitively by staff. The child’s dignity is respected. However, the written records are not all accurate. Some room searches do not follow policy, and oversight from the manager is missing. Staffing ratios have changed, and lone working is in place. This impacts the fire risk assessment outcome, which recognised the waking night staff as a safety factor in the home. The change in staffing and impact on potential harm have not been recognised or addressed.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The home is run by a qualified and experienced manager. It is appropriately staffed to ensure care for the child who is living there. The registered manager has high expectations and will challenge the appropriate agencies to ensure the right care for the child is achieved.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff providing care to the child are safe to do so. Safer recruitment processes are followed, and the manager is developing the team to ensure staff are skilled and knowledgeable in their roles. The child is involved in the recruitment process and selection of staff. Their feedback is valued by the registered manager.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff receive regular supervision. Supervision records show a focus on the child and safeguarding. Staff said they feel supported well by managers. However, there is no evidence of reflective discussions. The use of reflection in supervision is limited. This is a missed opportunity for further learning and developing practice.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Managers’ monitoring and review processes are not effective in all areas. Some written documents are not completed accurately to ensure the quality and standard of care for the child. Shortfalls in management oversight, missing records and the use of language Inspection report for children’s home: 2780235 4 have not been identified in the manager’s monitoring and review. This means managers are not taking action to address them.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The manager is keen to use feedback to develop care. Any complaints made by the child are addressed to support learning. The manager has built up strong relationships with partner agencies and family members. One agency said they were impressed by staff and that their approach works for the child living in the home. Inspection report for children’s home: 2780235 5

p.4

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.5

Requirement Due date

The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—

p.5

Requirement Due date

helps children aspire to their full potential; and

p.5

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—

p.5

Requirement Due date

use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b) (2)(h))

p.5

Requirement Due date

In particular, the manager should provide oversight where required and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and written records.

p.5

Requirement Due date

In particular, the manager should ensure effective staffing ratios to ensure staff follow the home’s policies. 30 January 2025

p.5

Recommendations

 The registered person should have systems in place so that all staff, including the manager, receive supervision of their practice from an appropriately qualified and experienced professional, which allows them to reflect on their practice. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including quality standards, page 61, paragraph 13.2) Inspection report for children’s home: 2780235 6

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the ‘social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2780235 7

p.6

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: Hallgate House, 9 Grange Terrace, Sunderland SR2 7DF

p.7

Inspector

Kate Jackson, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2780235 8 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion